SavedAdd your journal

Journals / IOJET / 2021 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

THE EFFECT OF FLIPPED CLASSROOM MODEL APPLICATIONS ON HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ CLASSROOM ENGAGEMENT AND CLASSROOM LIFE PERCEPTIONS IN TEACHING ENGLISH1

Burak Ayçiçek
Tuğba Yanpar Yelken
Journal
IOJET
Pages
2523–2539
Publication Date
2022-10-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, there was not a significant difference between the two groups in terms of student feelings related to other students sub-dimension.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigated the effect of technology-enhanced flipped classroom model applications on high school students’ classroom engagement and classroom life perceptions in teaching English.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was conducted with 45 students attending 9th grade for 8 weeks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, there was not a significant difference between the two groups in terms of student feelings related to other students sub-dimension.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of technology-enhanced flipped classroom model applications on high school students’ classroom engagement and classroom life perceptions in teaching English. In the study, pretest and posttest experiment-control group quasi-experimental design was used. The experimental group was taught using the flipped method and the control group was taught using the current conventional method. The study was conducted with 45 students attending 9th grade for 8 weeks. The data were collected from classroom engagement inventory and classroom life perception scale quantitatively. According to the findings, there was a significant difference in terms of classroom engagement levels. When the classroom engagement inventory sub-dimensions were examined, significant differences were found in the experimental group in terms of cognitive engagement and affective engagement sub-dimensions. However, there was not a significant difference between the two groups in terms of behavioral engagement–compliance, behavioral engagement-effortful classroom participation and disengagement sub-dimensions. On the other hand, there was a significant difference in terms of classroom life perception levels. When the classroom life perception scale sub-dimensions were examined, significant differences were found in the experimental group in terms of student feelings related to the classroom environment and student feelings related to the teacher sub-dimensions. However, there was not a significant difference between the two groups in terms of student feelings related to other students sub-dimension.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ayçiçek, B., Yelken, T. Y. (2022). THE EFFECT OF FLIPPED CLASSROOM MODEL APPLICATIONS ON HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ CLASSROOM ENGAGEMENT AND CLASSROOM LIFE PERCEPTIONS IN TEACHING ENGLISH1. IOJET, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 2523–2539. https://ajindex.com/articles/122207

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Abaeian, H., & Samadi, L. (2016). The effect of flipped classroom on Iranian EFL learners’ L2 reading comprehension: Focusing on different proficiency levels. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(6), 295-304.
  2. Ahmad, A. (2010). Constructivism based blended learning in higher education (Unpublished master’s thesis) Hasselt University, Germany. Ahmad, S. Z. (2016). The flipped classroom model to develop Egyptian EFL students’ listening comprehension. English Language Teaching, 9(9), 166-178.
  3. Al-Harbi, S. S., & Alshumaimeri, Y. A. (2016). The flipped classroom impact in grammar class on EFL Saudi secondary school students’ performances and attitudes. English Language Teaching, 9(10), 60-80.
  4. Alvarez, B. (2012). Flipping the classroom: Homework in class, lessons at home. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 77(8), 18-21.
  5. Anderson, K. M. (2007). Differentiating instruction to include all students. Preventing School Failure, 51(3), 49-54.
  6. Avery, K., Huggan, C., & Preston, J. P. (2018). The flipped classroom: High school student engagement through 21st century learning. In Education, 24(1), 4-21.
  7. Aycicek, B., & Yanpar Yelken, T. (2021). Classroom life perception scale: A scale development study. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 253-264. doi: 10.29333/iji.2021.14115a. Baek, S. G., & Choi, H. J. (2002). The relationship between students’ perceptions of classroom environment and their academic achievement in Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 3(1), 125-135.
  8. Basal, A. (2015). The implementation of a flipped classroom in foreign language teaching. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 16(4), 28-37.
  9. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2015). Flipped learning for English Instruction. Arlington, VA: International Society for Technology in Education. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington: International Society for Technology in Education. Birgin, O., Tutak, T., & Turkdogan, A. (2009). Primary school teachers’ views about the new Turkish primary school mathematics curriculum. E-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 4(2), 270-280.
  10. Bormann, J. (2014). Affordances of flipped learning and its effects on student engagement and achievement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University Of Northern Iowa. Brewer, R., & Movahedazarhouligh, S. (2018). Successful stories and conflicts: A literature review on the effectiveness of flipped learning in high