The prevalence of loser cows in extensive breeding systems in Transylvania

Objective & Hypothesis:The loser cow concept was introduced in scientific literature in 2005, by the Danish researcher Thomsen, referring to the cow 'unable to keep up with the rest of the herd'.

📊

Key Findings & Data:The identification of loser cows was done based on a clinical protocol including 7 clinical signs, from which the loser cow score was calculated.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:The overall prevalence of the loser cows (in 769 assessed cows) was 1.82%, a figure that can be considered low.

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:2005 Verileri

⚙️Variables:Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2010 · 34: 519-524. Full text: pdf Other articles published in the same issue: Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. · vol.34

Abstract

The loser cow concept was introduced in scientific literature in 2005, by the Danish researcher Thomsen, referring to the cow 'unable to keep up with the rest of the herd'. Since in Transylvania (Romania) the great majority of cattle are kept in extensive breeding systems, in small and middle sized farms, the purpose of the present study was to establish the prevalence of loser cows in such systems. The identification of loser cows was done based on a clinical protocol including 7 clinical signs, from which the loser cow score was calculated. Seven hundred and sixty nine cows in 123 small farms (2-15 cows/farm) in Transylvania were evaluated. The prevalence of loser cows in the investigated farms was between 0% and 13.3%. The overall prevalence of the loser cows (in 769 assessed cows) was 1.82%, a figure that can be considered low. Our study was meant to present a global image of the loser cows in a traditional type of animal housing, still present in Romania as well as in many other regions of the world.

Özet

The loser cow concept was introduced in scientific literature in 2005, by the Danish researcher Thomsen, referring to the cow 'unable to keep up with the rest of the herd'. Since in Transylvania (Romania) the great majority of cattle are kept in extensive breeding systems, in small and middle sized farms, the purpose of the present study was to establish the prevalence of loser cows in such systems. The identification of loser cows was done based on a clinical protocol including 7 clinical signs, from which the loser cow score was calculated. Seven hundred and sixty nine cows in 123 small farms (2-15 cows/farm) in Transylvania were evaluated. The prevalence of loser cows in the investigated farms was between 0% and 13.3%. The overall prevalence of the loser cows (in 769 assessed cows) was 1.82%, a figure that can be considered low. Our study was meant to present a global image of the loser cows in a traditional type of animal housing, still present in Romania as well as in many other regions of the world.

Keywords

Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2010 34: 519-524. Full text: pdf Other articles published in the same issue: Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci.vol.34 iss.6.

🔖

Cite This Article

POPESCU, S., BORDA, C., SANDRU, D. C., HEGEDÜS, C. İ. (2010). The prevalence of loser cows in extensive breeding systems in Transylvania. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 6, 519–524. https://ajindex.com/articles/121942

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

omsen, P.T., Baadsgaard, N.P.: Intra- and Inter-Observer Agreement of a Protocol for Clinical Examination of Dairy Cows. Short Communication. Prev. Vet. Med., 2006; 75:133- 139. Winckler, C., Capdeville, J., Gebresenbet, G., Hörning, B., Roiha, U., Tosi, M., Waiblinger, S.: Selection of Parameters for On-Farm Welfare-Assessment Protocols in Cattle and Buﬀalo. Anim. Welfare, 2003; 12: 619-624.
Regula, G., Danuser, J., Spycher, B., Wechsler, B.: Health and Welfare of Dairy Cows in Diﬀerent Husbandry Systems in Switzerland. Prev. Vet. Med., 2004; 66: 247-264.
Bowell, V.A., Rennie, L.J., Tierney, G., Lawrence, A.B., Haskell, M.J.: Relationship between Building Design, Management System and Dairy Cow Welfare. Anim. Welfare, 2003; 12: 547- 552. De Rosa, G., Tripaldi, C., Napolitano, F., Saltalamacchia, F., Grasso, F., Bisegna, V., Bordi, A.: Repeatability of Some Animal- Related Variables in Dairy Cows and Buﬀaloes. Anim. Welfare, 2003; 12: 625-629.
Whay, H.R., Main, D.C.J., Green, L.E., Webster, A.J.F.: Assessment of the Welfare of Dairy Cattle Using Animal-Based Measurements: Direct Observations and Investigation of Farm Records. Vet. Rec., 2003; 153: 197-202. Alban L.: Lameness in Danish dairy cows: frequency and possible risk factors. Prev. Vet. Med., 1995; 22: 213–225.
Clarkson, M., Downham, D., Fuall, W.: Incidence and prevalence of lameness in dairy cattle. Vet. Rec., 1996; 8: 563– 567. Cook, N.B.: Prevalence of lameness among dairy cattle in Wisconsin as a function of housing type and stall surface. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 2003;223:1324–1328.
Gustafson, G.M.: Eﬀects of Daily Exercise on the Health of Tied Dairy Cows. Prev. Vet. Med., 1993; 17: 209-223.
Loberg, J., Telezhenko, E., Bergsten, C., Lidfors, L.: Behaviour and Claw Health in Tied Dairy Cows with Varying Access to Exercise in an Outdoor Paddock. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 2004; 89: 1-16.
Hernandez-Mendo, O., von Keyserlingk, M.A.G., Veira, D.M., Weary, D.M.: Eﬀects of Pasture on Lameness in Dairy Cows. J. Dairy Sci., 2007; 90: 1209-1214.
Weary, D.M., Taszkun, I.: Hock lesions and free-stall design. J. Dairy Sci., 2000; 83: 697–702.
Zurbrigg, K., Kelton, D., Anderson, N., Millman, S.: Stall dimensions and the prevalence of lameness, injury, and cleanliness on 317 tie-stall dairy farms in Ontario. Can. Vet. J., 2005; 46: 902–909.
Wechsler, B., Schaub, J., Friedli, K., Hauser, R.: Behaviour and leg injuries in dairy cows kept in cubicle systems with straw bedding or so lying mats. Appl. Anim. Beha