Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2010 / Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 6

Comparative studies on the sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and microscopic examination for the detection of Trypanosoma evansi in horses

Pages
507–512
Publication Date
2010-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Field application of PCR would not only ensure early diagnosis and treatment in individual animals but would also help eliminate the animal reservoir of infection and thus the threat to equine and camel herds that are grazed and housed together and where blood sucking mechanical fly vectors are ever present.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The lack of reliable diagnostic methods is a setback in the effective control of diseases.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The PCR method was sufficiently sensitive; using this method out of 100 blood samples examined from horses in Lahore, Pakistan, 16 (16%) showed a positive reaction (a 164-bp fragment) as visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis and 5 (5%) were positive by microscopic examination.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Field application of PCR would not only ensure early diagnosis and treatment in individual animals but would also help eliminate the animal reservoir of infection and thus the threat to equine and camel herds that are grazed and housed together and where blood sucking mechanical fly vectors are ever present.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2010 · 34: 507-512. Full text: pdf Other articles published in the same issue: Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. · vol.34

Abstract

The lack of reliable diagnostic methods is a setback in the effective control of diseases. Diagnosis of Trypanosoma evansi infection (surra) in livestock is of considerable economic importance. Detection of trypanosomes in blood has been the "gold standard"; however, finding the organisms or establishing patency of parasitaemia has not always been possible even in symptomatic infections. As a consequence of low dose infection, the pre-patent period in Trypanosoma evansi may be longer and, even when symptoms have developed, trypanosomes may still not be demonstrable in blood, thus delaying treatment and thereby increasing morbidity and mortality. Trypanosoma evansi, a protozoan parasite in the blood of horses, is routinely diagnosed by finding the flagellates in the stained smear of blood examined under a microscope. Although specific, this method is not sensitive at the early stages of infection. Using a specific pair of primers we tested the use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in comparison with microscopic examination, i.e. Giemsa stained smear method, for the diagnosis of Trypanosoma evansi infection (surra) in horses. The PCR method was sufficiently sensitive; using this method out of 100 blood samples examined from horses in Lahore, Pakistan, 16 (16%) showed a positive reaction (a 164-bp fragment) as visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis and 5 (5%) were positive by microscopic examination. These findings suggest that PCR is a useful diagnostic tool for detecting Trypanosoma evansi infected horses in the very early stages where microscopic examination is equivocal. Application of PCR to field diagnosis is therefore clearly indicated by the results. Field application of PCR would not only ensure early diagnosis and treatment in individual animals but would also help eliminate the animal reservoir of infection and thus the threat to equine and camel herds that are grazed and housed together and where blood sucking mechanical fly vectors are ever present.

Özet

The lack of reliable diagnostic methods is a setback in the effective control of diseases. Diagnosis of Trypanosoma evansi infection (surra) in livestock is of considerable economic importance. Detection of trypanosomes in blood has been the "gold standard"; however, finding the organisms or establishing patency of parasitaemia has not always been possible even in symptomatic infections. As a consequence of low dose infection, the pre-patent period in Trypanosoma evansi may be longer and, even when symptoms have developed, trypanosomes may still not be demonstrable in blood, thus delaying treatment and thereby increasing morbidity and mortality. Trypanosoma evansi, a protozoan parasite in the blood of horses, is routinely diagnosed by finding the flagellates in the stained smear of blood examined under a microscope. Although specific, this method is not sensitive at the early stages of infection. Using a specific pair of primers we tested the use of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in comparison with microscopic examination, i.e. Giemsa stained smear method, for the diagnosis of Trypanosoma evansi infection (surra) in horses. The PCR method was sufficiently sensitive; using this method out of 100 blood samples examined from horses in Lahore, Pakistan, 16 (16%) showed a positive reaction (a 164-bp fragment) as visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis and 5 (5%) were positive by microscopic examination. These findings suggest that PCR is a useful diagnostic tool for detecting Trypanosoma evansi infected horses in the very early stages where microscopic examination is equivocal. Application of PCR to field diagnosis is therefore clearly indicated by the results. Field application of PCR would not only ensure early diagnosis and treatment in individual animals but would also help eliminate the animal reservoir of infection and thus the threat to equine and camel herds that are grazed and housed together and where blood sucking mechanical fly vectors are ever present.

🔖

Cite This Article

MUIEED, M. A., CHAUDHARY, Z. İ., SHAKOORI, A. R. (2010). Comparative studies on the sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and microscopic examination for the detection of Trypanosoma evansi in horses. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 34 - Sayı: 6, 507–512. https://ajindex.com/articles/121940

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Franke, C.R., Greiner, M., Mehlitz, D.: Monitoring of Clinical, Parasitological Parameters During an Experimental Infection of Caybara (Hydrochacris hydrochacris) with Trypanosoma evansi. Acta. Trop., 1994; 58: 171-74.
  2. Panyim, S., Viseshakul, N., Luxananil, P., Wuyts, N., Chokesajjawatee, N., Uilenberg, G., Hamers, R.: A PCR Method for Highly Sensitive Detection of Trypanosoma evansi in Blood Samples. In: Resistance or Tolerance of Animals to Disease and Veterinary Epidemiology and Diagnostic Methods, CIRAD, Maisons Alfort, France, 1993; 138-143.
  3. Wuyts, N., Chokesajjawatee, N, Panyim, S.: A Simplified and Highly Sensitive Detection of Trypanosoma evansi by DNA Amplification. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health., 1994; 25: 266-71.
  4. Almedia, P.J., Ndao, M., Goossens, B., Osaer S.: PCR primer evaluation for the detection of trypanosome DNA in naturally infected goats. Vet. Parasitol., 1998; 80: 111-16.
  5. Basagoudanavar, S.H., Rao, J.R., Omanwar, S., Singh, R.K., Butchaiah, G.: Sensitive polymerase chain reaction for detection of Trypanosoma Evansi in camels (Camelus dromedarius). J. Parasit. Dis., 1998; 22: 40-43.
  6. Basagoudanavar, S.H., Rao, J.R., Singh, R.K., Butchaiah, G.: Random amplification of polymorphic DNA fingerprinting of Trypansoma evansi. Vet Res Commun., 1999; 23: 249-55.
  7. Wang-YunFei, Zhou-YongZhi, Zhong-SuMei, Song-Bin, Shen- Jie, Wang-YF, Zhou-YZ, Zhong-SM, Song-B, Shen-J.: Detection of Trypanosoma evansi by PCR. Acta. Veterinaria. Et. Zootechnica, Sinica., 1998; 29: 168-173.
  8. Omanwar, S., Rao, J.R., Basagoudanavar, S.H., Singh, R.K., Butchaiah, D. Direct and sensitive detection of Trypanosoma evansi by polymerase chain reaction. Acta. Vet. Hung., 1999; 47: 351-9.
  9. Holland, W.G., Claes, F., My, L.N., Thanh, N.G., Tam, P.T., Verloo, D., Buscher, P., Goddeeris, B., Vercruysse, J.: A comparative evaluation of parasitological tests and a PCR for Trypanosoma evansi diagnosis in experimentally infected water buffaloes. Vet. Parasitol., 2001; 97: 23-33.
  10. Masiga, R.C., Nyang, J.M.N.: Identification of Trypanosome species from camel using polymerase chain reaction and procyclic transformation test. J. Camel Pract. Res., 2001; 8: 17- 22. Chansiri, K., Khuchareontaworn, S., Sarataphan, N.: PCR- ELISA for diagnosis of Trypanosoma evansi in animals and vectors. Mol. Cell. Probes., 2002; 16: 173-77.
  11. Clausen, P.H., Chuluun, S., Sodnomdarjaa, R., Greiner,M., Noeckler,K., Staak, C., Zessin, K.H., Schein, E.: A field study to estimate the prevalence of Trypanos