Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2013 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 6

Semen quality in white leghorn chicken selected for egg production traits

Pages
747–749
Publication Date
2013-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, it can be concluded that selection for higher egg production affects the semen quality of males in the selected lines.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of selection for egg production traits in White Leghorn chicken based upon the semen quality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Males of 3 pure lines of White Leghorn, namely IWH, IWI, and IWK, along with a pedigree random-bred control (IWC) population, were selected and housed in individual cages.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, it can be concluded that selection for higher egg production affects the semen quality of males in the selected lines.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: White leghorn · semen · selection

Abstract

The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of selection for egg production traits in White Leghorn chicken based upon the semen quality. Males of 3 pure lines of White Leghorn, namely IWH, IWI, and IWK, along with a pedigree random-bred control (IWC) population, were selected and housed in individual cages. The semen collected from individual birds was evaluated for different physical and biochemical parameters. There was significant (P =< 0.013) difference in semen quality parameters studied between the lines. High egg-producing lines IWH and IWI had poor semen quality in comparison with that of the control line (IWC). Thus, it can be concluded that selection for higher egg production affects the semen quality of males in the selected lines.

Özet

The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of selection for egg production traits in White Leghorn chicken based upon the semen quality. Males of 3 pure lines of White Leghorn, namely IWH, IWI, and IWK, along with a pedigree random-bred control (IWC) population, were selected and housed in individual cages. The semen collected from individual birds was evaluated for different physical and biochemical parameters. There was significant (P =< 0.013) difference in semen quality parameters studied between the lines. High egg-producing lines IWH and IWI had poor semen quality in comparison with that of the control line (IWC). Thus, it can be concluded that selection for higher egg production affects the semen quality of males in the selected lines.

🔖

Cite This Article

MURUGESAN, S., MATAM, N., KULKARNI, R. (2013). Semen quality in white leghorn chicken selected for egg production traits. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 6, 747–749. https://ajindex.com/articles/121939

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Niranjan M, Datt C, Das A. Semen quality studies in two White Leghorn lines maintained at Tripura. Indian J Poult Sci 2001; 36: 287–289.
  2. Frankham F, Doornenbal H. Semen characteristics of lines selected for increased part-record egg production. Poult Sci 1972; 51: 1468–1469.
  3. Burrows WH, Quinn JP. The collection of spermatozoa from the domestic fowl and turkey. Poult Sci 1937; 16: 19–24.
  4. Chaudhuri D, Lake PE. A new diluent and methods of holding semen for up to 17 hours at high temperature. In: Proceedings of the 18th World’s Poultry Congress, Nagoya, Japan; 1988. pp. 591–593.
  5. McDaniel GR, Craig JV. Behavior traits, semen measurements, and fertility of White Leghorn males. Poult Sci 1959; 38: 1005– 10 Hazary RC, Chaudhuri D, Wishart GJ. Application of an MTT reduction assay for assessing sperm quality and predicting fertilising ability of domestic fowl semen. Br Poult Sci 2001; 42: 115–117.
  6. Campbell RG, Hancock JL, Rothschild L. Counting live and dead bull spermatozoa. J Exp Biol 1953; 30: 44–49.
  7. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem 1951; 193: 265–275.