SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2012 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1

Performance analysis of a two stage pad cooling system in broiler houses

Metin PETEK
Serdal DİKMEN
Mehmet Mustafa OĞAN
Pages
21–26
Publication Date
2012-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that two stage pad cooling is a more efficient method to alleviate heat stress in broilers during heat stress conditions and to improve growth performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The cooling performance of a traditional (control) and two stage evaporative pad cooling system (experiment), including pad and fan with tunnel ventilation, for poultry houses and the growth performance of broilers reared in these systems was compared in a study performed during extreme summer temperatures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Air temperature, relative humidity, and saturation efficiency were used to determine the cooling performance of the systems.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that two stage pad cooling is a more efficient method to alleviate heat stress in broilers during heat stress conditions and to improve growth performance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Broiler house · pad cooling · performance

Abstract

The cooling performance of a traditional (control) and two stage evaporative pad cooling system (experiment), including pad and fan with tunnel ventilation, for poultry houses and the growth performance of broilers reared in these systems was compared in a study performed during extreme summer temperatures. The experimental unit had a two stage pad cooling system, which consisted of underground tubes and a box, followed by a pad cooling system with tunnel ventilation. The control unit had a traditional evaporative cooling system, including pad and fan with tunnel ventilation. Air temperature, relative humidity, and saturation efficiency were used to determine the cooling performance of the systems. Live body weight gain, feed conversion ratio, and mortality rate were used to monitor the growth performance of broilers raised in these systems. The air temperature and relative humidity of incoming house and exhausted air in the two stage pad cooling system were found to be significantly lower than those of the traditional system (P < 0.05). The cooling efficiency or saturation efficiency in the two stage cooling system was found to be slightly greater than that of the traditional system. Body weight gain was also significantly influenced by the cooling system (P < 0.05). The results indicated that two stage pad cooling is a more efficient method to alleviate heat stress in broilers during heat stress conditions and to improve growth performance.

Özet

The cooling performance of a traditional (control) and two stage evaporative pad cooling system (experiment), including pad and fan with tunnel ventilation, for poultry houses and the growth performance of broilers reared in these systems was compared in a study performed during extreme summer temperatures. The experimental unit had a two stage pad cooling system, which consisted of underground tubes and a box, followed by a pad cooling system with tunnel ventilation. The control unit had a traditional evaporative cooling system, including pad and fan with tunnel ventilation. Air temperature, relative humidity, and saturation efficiency were used to determine the cooling performance of the systems. Live body weight gain, feed conversion ratio, and mortality rate were used to monitor the growth performance of broilers raised in these systems. The air temperature and relative humidity of incoming house and exhausted air in the two stage pad cooling system were found to be significantly lower than those of the traditional system (P < 0.05). The cooling efficiency or saturation efficiency in the two stage cooling system was found to be slightly greater than that of the traditional system. Body weight gain was also significantly influenced by the cooling system (P < 0.05). The results indicated that two stage pad cooling is a more efficient method to alleviate heat stress in broilers during heat stress conditions and to improve growth performance.

🔖

Cite This Article

PETEK, M., DİKMEN, S., OĞAN, M. M. (2012). Performance analysis of a two stage pad cooling system in broiler houses. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1, 21–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/121853

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Mashaly, M.M., Hendricks, G.L., Kalama, M.A., Gehad, A.E., Abbas, A.O., Patterson, P.H.: Eff ect of heat stress on production parameters and immune responses of commercial laying hens. Poultry Sci., 2004; 83: 889-94.
  2. Wolfenson, D., Bachrach, D., Maman, M., Graber, Y., Rozenboim, I.: Evaporative cooling of ventral regions of the skin in heat-stressed laying hens. Poultry Sci., 2001: 80: 958-64.
  3. North, M.O., Bell, D.D.: Commercial Chicken Production Manual, Fourth Edition. Chapman & Hall, New York, 1990; 192-193. 4. Donald, J.: Getting the most from evaporative cooling systems in tunnel ventilated broiler houses. World Poultry, 2000; 16: 35-39. 5. Dozier, W.A., Lott, B.D., Branton, S.L.: Live performance of male broilers subjected to constant or increasing air velocities at moderate temperatures with a high dew point. Poultry Sci., 2005; 84: 1328-31.
  4. Gunhan, T., Demir, V., Yagcioglu, A.K.: Evaluation of the Suitability of Some Local Materials as Cooling Pads. Biosystems Engineering, 2007; 96: 369-367.
  5. Jain, D., Tiwari, G.N.: Modeling and optimal design of evaporative cooling system in controlled environment greenhouse. Energy Conversion and Management, 2002; 43: 2235-2250. 8. Kittas, C., Bartzanas, T., Jaff rin, A.: Temperature gradients in a partially shaded large greenhouse equipped with evaporative cooling pads. Biosystems Engineering, 2003; 85: 87-94. 9. Uğurlu, N., Kara, M.: Th e cooling performance of wet pads and their eff ects on reduction of the inside temperature a cage house. Turk. J. Agric. For., 2000; 24: 79-86.
  6. Willits, D.H.: Cooling fan-ventilated greenhouse: a modeling study. Biosystems Engineering, 2003; 84: 314-329.
  7. Dozier, W.A., Lott, B.D., Branton, S.L.: Growth responses of male broilers subjected to increasing air velocities at high ambient temperatures and a high dew point. Poultry Sci., 2005; 84: 962-6.
  8. Simmons, J.D., Miles, D.M., Lott, B.D.: Th e eff ects of high air velocity on broiler performance. Tektran. United States Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Research Service, 2002.
  9. Hulzebosch, J.: How to keep your birds cool. World Poultry, 2005; 21: 32-4.
  10. Alchalabi, D.: Two-stage air cooling for very hot environments. Poultry Int., 2001; 10: 21-23.
  11. Botcher, R.W., Baugman, G.R., Kesler, D.J.: Evaporative cooling using a pneumatic misting system. Trans. ASAE, 1989; 32: 671- 676. Snedecor, G.W., Cochran, W.G.: Statistical Methods, Eighth Edition.
  12. Iowa State University Press,
  13. Ames, IA, USA. 1989. SPSS® 13.00 Computer Soft ware: SPSS I