Journals / Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2023 / Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2

THE EFFECT OF PRODUCTIVE CAPACITIES COMPONENTS ON THE ECONOMIC GROWTH IN BRICS COUNTRIES: PANEL CANTILE REGRESSION ANALYSIS

BRICS Ülkelerinde Üretken Kapasiteler Bileşenlerinin İktisadi Büyümeye Etkisi: Panel Kantil Regresyon Analizi

Abdullah Topcuoğlu(BOLU ABANT İZZET BAYSAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7857-6021
Pages
409–424
Publication Date
2023-12-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of estimating the model at 5% significance level with robust standard errors, the effects of productive capacities index components on economic growth in the BRICS countries in the 2000-2018 period are as follows; a 1% increase in natural capital reduces economic growth by 0.06%; 1% increase in energy increases economic growth by 0.13%; a 1% increase in transportation increases economic growth by 0.05%, a 1% increase in information and communication technology increases economic growth by 0.12%, a 1% increase in institutions increases economic growth by 0.07%, and a 1% increase in the private sector. increased economic growth by about 0.02%; It has been found that 1% increase in structural change reduces economic growth by 0.03%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to measure the productive capacities components-economic growth relationship in the BRICS countries in the period of 2000-2018 with panel quantile regression analysis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Autocorrelation tests and varying variance tests were applied to determine whether there were autocorrelation and varying variance problems in the models applied in different quantile bands (10th-90th) of the variables.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of estimating the model at 5% significance level with robust standard errors, the effects of productive capacities index components on economic growth in the BRICS countries in the 2000-2018 period are as follows; a 1% increase in natural capital reduces economic growth by 0.06%; 1% increase in energy increases economic growth by 0.13%; a 1% increase in transportation increases economic growth by 0.05%, a 1% increase in information and communication technology increases economic growth by 0.12%, a 1% increase in institutions increases economic growth by 0.07%, and a 1% increase in the private sector. increased economic growth by about 0.02%; It has been found that 1% increase in structural change reduces economic growth by 0.03%.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2000-2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Panel Kantil Regresyon Analizi · İktisadi Büyüme · Üretken Kapasiteler Endeksi Bileşenleri

Abstract

The aim of this study is to measure the productive capacities components-economic growth relationship in the BRICS countries in the period of 2000-2018 with panel quantile regression analysis. First of all, correlation test, multicollinearity test, normality tests and Hausman test were applied to perform panel quantile regression analysis. Autocorrelation tests and varying variance tests were applied to determine whether there were autocorrelation and varying variance problems in the models applied in different quantile bands (10th-90th) of the variables. It was determined that there were problems of autocorrelation and varying variance in the model and therefore the model was estimated with robust standart errors in the 50th quantile range and at the 5% significance level. As a result of estimating the model at 5% significance level with robust standard errors, the effects of productive capacities index components on economic growth in the BRICS countries in the 2000-2018 period are as follows; a 1% increase in natural capital reduces economic growth by 0.06%; 1% increase in energy increases economic growth by 0.13%; a 1% increase in transportation increases economic growth by 0.05%, a 1% increase in information and communication technology increases economic growth by 0.12%, a 1% increase in institutions increases economic growth by 0.07%, and a 1% increase in the private sector. increased economic growth by about 0.02%; It has been found that 1% increase in structural change reduces economic growth by 0.03%.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı BRICS ülkelerinde 2000-2018 döneminde üretken kapasiteler bileşenleri- iktisadi büyüme ilişkisini panel kantil regresyon analiziyle ölçmektir. Öncelikle panel kantil regresyon analizinin gerçekleştirilebilmesi için korelasyon testi, çoklu doğrusal bağlantı testi, normallik sınamaları ve Hausman testi uygulanmıştır. Değişkenlere ait farklı kantil bantlarında (10th-90th) uygulanan modellerde otokorelasyon ve değişen varyans sorunlarının olup olmadığının tespiti için otokorelasyon ve değişen varyans testleri uygulanmıştır. Modelde otokorelasyon ve değişen varyans sorunlarının olduğu tespit edilmiş ve bu yüzden model 50th kantil aralığında ve %5 anlamlılık seviyesinde dirençli hatalarla tahmin edilmiştir. Modelin dirençli standart hatalarla %5 anlamlılık düzeyinde tahmin edilmesi sonucunda BRICS ülkelerinde 2000-2018 döneminde üretken kapasiteler endeksi bileşenlerinin iktisadi büyümeye etkileri şu şeklidedir; doğal sermayedeki %1’lik artışın iktisadi büyümeyi %0.06 oranında azalttığı; enerjideki %1’lik artışın iktisadi büyümeyi %0.13 oranında artırdığı; ulaşımdaki %1’lik bir artışın iktisadi büyümeyi %0.05 oranında artırdığı, bilgi ve iletişim teknolojisindeki %1’lik artışın iktisadi büyümeyi %0.12 oranında artırdığı, kurumlardaki %1’lik artışın iktisadi büyümeyi %0.07 oranında artırdığı, özel sektördeki %1’lik artışın iktisadi büyümeyi %0.02 oranında artırdığı; yapısal değişimdeki %1’lik artışın ise iktisadi büyümeyi %0.03 oranında azalttığı bulgularına ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ayyıldız, F. V., Topcuoğlu, A. (2023). THE EFFECT OF PRODUCTIVE CAPACITIES COMPONENTS ON THE ECONOMIC GROWTH IN BRICS COUNTRIES: PANEL CANTILE REGRESSION ANALYSIS. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2, 409–424. https://ajindex.com/articles/1217986

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Altıntaş,S.(2022) G-20 grubu ülkelerin üretkenlik kapasitelerinin değerlendirilmesi.19 Mayıs Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(2), 138-152.
  2. Cade, B. S., & Noon, B. R. (2003) A gentle introduction to quantile regression for ecologists. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1(8), 412-420.
  3. Castellacci, F. (2001)" A technology gap approach to cumulative growth”: Toward an integrated model empirical evidence for Spain, 1960–1997. Paper presented at the Druid Academy Winter Conference, Copenhagen, 18–20 January 2001.
  4. Gereffi, G. (1999) International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain. Journal of Enternational economics, 48(1), 37-70.
  5. Hirschman, A. O. (1958) The strategy of economic development. New Haven: Yale University Press
  6. Kaldor, N. (1967) Strategic factors in economic development.New York: Cornell University Press.
  7. Kaldor, N. (1981) The role of increasing returns, technical progress and cumulative causation in the theory of international trade and economic growth. Economie Appliquee, 34(6),593–617
  8. Kaplinsky, R., Morris, M., & Readman The globalization, J. (2002). The globalization of product markets and immiserizing growth: Lessons from the South African furniture industry. World Development, 30(7), 1159-1177.
  9. Kaldor, N. (1967) Strategic factors in economic development.New York: Cornell University Press.