Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 5

Effects of housing environment on social isolation response, weaning stress, and immune reaction in goat kids

Pages
635–642
Publication Date
2017-11-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Findings revealed that both social isolation tests created stress in the goat kids.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigated how environmental structuring in the growing units of goat kids influences their ability to cope with social isolation and weaning-induced stress.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Two experimental groups were arranged in an enriched (E) or barren (B) environment and each of the two groups had 10 female and 10 male kids.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Findings revealed that both social isolation tests created stress in the goat kids.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Environmental enrichment · bleating · rearing

Abstract

This study investigated how environmental structuring in the growing units of goat kids influences their ability to cope with social isolation and weaning-induced stress. Two experimental groups were arranged in an enriched (E) or barren (B) environment and each of the two groups had 10 female and 10 male kids. During the social isolation, the goat kids in group E started bleating earlier (P = 0.1612) and more frequently (P = 0.0125). Goat kids also bleated earlier (P = 0.0005) and more often after the weaning period (P = 0.0006). Only the rearing behavior of the groups exhibited significant differences in social isolation. However, after the weaning, kids showed more bipedal stance behavior (P = 0.0204) and less running behavior (P = 0.0394) than before the weaning period. Cortisol, triiodothyronine (T3), and thyroxine (T4) hormone concentrations were lower at weaning than in the other periods with social isolation (P < 0.05). The T3 hormone concentrations of the groups at weaning were significantly different (P = 0.0201). The immune response to Brucella vaccination did not differ between the groups (P = 0.2753). Findings revealed that both social isolation tests created stress in the goat kids. Considering the bleating frequencies, it can be concluded that the goat kids in the enriched environment experienced more social isolation stress than the goat kids in the barren environment.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÖLÜ, C., GÖKTÜRK, S., SAVAŞ, T. (2017). Effects of housing environment on social isolation response, weaning stress, and immune reaction in goat kids. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 5, 635–642. https://ajindex.com/articles/121746

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Flint M, Murray PJ. Lot-fed goats-the advantages of using an enriched environment. Aust J Exp Agr 2001; 41: 473-476.
  2. Rosas-Trigueros AP, Salaverri JO, Duran JAC, Quiles Sotillo AJ. Effect of environmental enrichment on the behaviour and welfare of suckling dairy goat kids in confinement. In: Proceedings of the 43rd Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology, Cairns, Australia; 2009. p. 542. Millet S, Moons CPH, Oeckel MJV, Janssens GPJ. Welfare, performance and meat quality of fattening pigs in alternative housing and management systems: a review. J Sci Food Agr 2005; 85: 709-719. Newberry RC. Environmental enrichment: increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1995; 44: 229-243.
  3. Kingston SG, Hoffman-Goetz L. Effect of environmental enrichment and housing density on immune system reactivity to acute exercise stress. Physiol Behav 1996; 60: 145-150.
  4. Bolhuis JE, Parmentier HK, Schouten WGP, Schrama JW, Wiegant VM. Effects of housing and individual coping characteristics on immune responses of pigs. Physiol Behav 2003; 79: 289-296. Grandin T. Assessment of stress during handling and transport. J Anim Sci 1997; 75: 249-257.
  5. Rushen J, Boissy A, Terlouw EMC, de Passile AMB. Opioid peptides and behavioral and physiological responses of dairy cows to social isolation in unfamiliar surroundings. J Anim Sci 1999; 77: 2918-2924.
  6. Möstl E, Palme R. Hormones as indicators of stress. Domest Anim Endocrin 2002; 23: 67-74.
  7. Ataşoğlu C, Yurtman İY, Savaş T, Gültepe M, Özcan Ö. Effect of weaning on behavior and serum parameters in dairy goat kids. Anim Sci J 2008; 79: 435-442. Kocatürk PA. Response to stress. Ankara Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Mecmuası 2000; 53: 49-56 (in Turkish with an abstract in English). Todini L, Malfatti A, Valbonesi A, Trabalza-Marunucci M, Debenedetti A. Plasma total T3 and T4 concentrations in goats at different physiological stages, as affected by the energy intake. Small Ruminant Res 2007; 68: 285-290.
  8. Carbonaro DA, Friend TH, Dellmeier GR, Nuti LC. Behavioral and physiological responses of dairy goats to isolation. Physiol Behav 1992; 51: 297-301.
  9. Sanz Smpelayo MR, Prieto I, Lupiani MJ, Gil Extremera F, Boza J. Physiological responses of pre-ruminant kid goats and lambs to different environmental temperatures. J Physiol Biochem 2000; 56: 223-230.
  10. Padgett DA, Glaser R. How stress influences the immune response. Trends Immunol 2003; 24: 444-448.
  11. Segerstrom SC, Miller GE. Psychological stress and