Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2013 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of signalment, clinical, and laboratory variables as prognostic indicators in dogs with acute abdominal syndrome

Pages
214–222
Publication Date
2013-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The presented severity scoring system could reliably assess the severity and probability of death in dogs with acute abdomen and could be used in small animal clinical practice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of the study was to identify predictors of mortality and to propose a new severity scoring system in dogs with acute abdominal syndrome.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A retrospective study was carried out on 58 dogs presented with acute abdominal syndrome with American Society of Anesthesiologists grades III-IV and treated surgically by exploratory laparotomy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The presented severity scoring system could reliably assess the severity and probability of death in dogs with acute abdomen and could be used in small animal clinical practice.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Mortality predictors · acute abdomen scoring system · dogs

Abstract

The aim of the study was to identify predictors of mortality and to propose a new severity scoring system in dogs with acute abdominal syndrome. A retrospective study was carried out on 58 dogs presented with acute abdominal syndrome with American Society of Anesthesiologists grades III-IV and treated surgically by exploratory laparotomy. Medical records were reviewed and information regarding dog signalment, history, clinical, and laboratory data; surgical findings; and outcome was collected. Multiple easily measurable variables were found to be mortality predictors in dogs with acute abdominal syndrome, but the most relevant were the presence of neoplastic process, organ rupture, abdominal distention, and solid organ involvement. Based on the acute abdomen scoring system, animals that received 14 points had a 50% chance of survival, with a sensitivity of 90.48%, specificity of 97.3%, and positive and negative predictive values of 95% and 94.7%, respectively, at this cut-point. According to the receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis, this scoring system classified 94.83% of the cases correctly with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) = 0.965 (P = 0.0001). The presented severity scoring system could reliably assess the severity and probability of death in dogs with acute abdomen and could be used in small animal clinical practice.

Özet

The aim of the study was to identify predictors of mortality and to propose a new severity scoring system in dogs with acute abdominal syndrome. A retrospective study was carried out on 58 dogs presented with acute abdominal syndrome with American Society of Anesthesiologists grades III-IV and treated surgically by exploratory laparotomy. Medical records were reviewed and information regarding dog signalment, history, clinical, and laboratory data; surgical findings; and outcome was collected. Multiple easily measurable variables were found to be mortality predictors in dogs with acute abdominal syndrome, but the most relevant were the presence of neoplastic process, organ rupture, abdominal distention, and solid organ involvement. Based on the acute abdomen scoring system, animals that received 14 points had a 50% chance of survival, with a sensitivity of 90.48%, specificity of 97.3%, and positive and negative predictive values of 95% and 94.7%, respectively, at this cut-point. According to the receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis, this scoring system classified 94.83% of the cases correctly with the area under the ROC curve (AUC) = 0.965 (P = 0.0001). The presented severity scoring system could reliably assess the severity and probability of death in dogs with acute abdomen and could be used in small animal clinical practice.

🔖

Cite This Article

SIMEONOVA, G., DINEV, D., CHAPRAZOV, T., ROYDEV, R. (2013). Evaluation of signalment, clinical, and laboratory variables as prognostic indicators in dogs with acute abdominal syndrome. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 2, 214–222. https://ajindex.com/articles/121636

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Walters, P.C.: Approach to the acute abdomen. Clin. Tech. Small An. P., 2000; 15: 63–69.
  2. Reeves, M.J., Curtis, C.R., Salman, M.D., Hilbert, B.J.: Prognosis in equine colic patients using multivariable analysis. Can. J. Vet. Res., 1989; 53: 87–94.
  3. King, L.G.: Severity of disease and outcome prediction. In: Wingfield, W.E., Raffe, M.R., Eds. The Veterinary ICU Book. Teton NewMedia, Jackson, WY, USA. 2002; 413–420.
  4. Küplülü, S., Vural, M.R., Demirel, A., Polat, M., Akçay, A.: The comparative evaluation of serum biochemical, haematological, bacteriological and clinical findings of dead and recovered bitches with pyometra in the postoperative process. Acta Veterinaria (Beograd), 2009; 59: 193–204.
  5. Mackenzie, G., Barnhart, M., Kennedy, S., DeHoff, W., Schertel, E.: A retrospective study of factors influencing survival following surgery for gastric dilatation-volvulus syndrome in 306 dogs. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc., 2010; 46: 97–102.
  6. Galezowski, A.M., Snead, E.C.R., Kidney, B.A., Jackson, M.L.: C-reactive protein as a prognostic indicator in dogs with acute abdomen syndrome. J. Vet. Diagn. Invest., 2010; 22: 395–401.
  7. Hardie, E.M., Jayawickrama, J., Duff, L.C., Becker, K.M.: Prognostic indicators of survival in high-risk canine surgery patients. J. Vet. Emerg. Crit. Care, 1995; 5: 42–49.
  8. Hosgood, G., Scholl, D.T.: Evaluation of age as a risk factor for perianesthetic morbidity and mortality in the dog. J. Vet. Emerg. Crit. Care, 2007; 8: 222–236.
  9. Grimes, J.A., Schmiedt, C.W., Cornell, K.K., Radlinksy, M.G.: Identification of risk factors for septic peritonitis and failure to survive following gastrointestinal surgery in dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 2011; 238: 486–494.
  10. Ludwig, L.L., McLoughlin, M.A., Graves, T.K., Crisp, M.S.: Surgical treatment of bile peritonitis in 24 dogs and 2 cats: a retrospective study (1987-1994). Vet. Surg., 1997; 26: 90–98.
  11. Winkler, K.P., Greenfield, C.L.: Potential prognostic indicators in diffuse peritonitis treated with open peritoneal drainage in the canine patients. J. Vet. Emerg. Crit. Care, 2007; 10: 259–265.
  12. King, L.G., Stevens, M.T., Ostro, E.N.S., Diserens, D., Ravi Shankar, J.: A model for prediction of survival in critically ill dogs. J. Vet. Emerg. Crit. Care, 1994; 4: 85–99.
  13. Hayes, G., Mathews, K., Doig, G., Kruth, S., Boston, S., Nykamp, S., Poljak, Z., Dewey, C.: The acute patient physiologic and laboratory evaluation (APPLE) score: a severity of illness stratification system for hospitalized dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med., 2