Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2014 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3

Conservation characteristics and protein fractions of cereal silages ensiled with additives at the booting and dough stages of maturity

Pages
285–294
Publication Date
2014-05-18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that additives, in particular bacterial inoculant, can improve fermentation and protein quality at both stages examined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of organic acid and bacterial inoculant on conservation characteristics and protein fractions as defined by the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System of barley, wheat, rye, triticale, and oat silages ensiled at their booting or dough stage of maturity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The cereal crops were not treated or were treated with bacteria (L. buchneri, L. plantarum, E. faecium) or organic acid (formic acid, propionic acid, sodium formate) and ensiled in 1.0-L anaerobic jars for 45 days.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that additives, in particular bacterial inoculant, can improve fermentation and protein quality at both stages examined.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Key words: Additives · cereal silages · fermentation

Abstract

The experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of organic acid and bacterial inoculant on conservation characteristics and protein fractions as defined by the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System of barley, wheat, rye, triticale, and oat silages ensiled at their booting or dough stage of maturity. The cereal crops were not treated or were treated with bacteria (L. buchneri, L. plantarum, E. faecium) or organic acid (formic acid, propionic acid, sodium formate) and ensiled in 1.0-L anaerobic jars for 45 days. Bacterial inoculant improved the fermentation profile for all cereal silages and increased the dry matter (DM) recovery at both maturity stages. The benefit of bacteria inclusion in the silage was more pronounced when applied at dough stages. Organic acid also improved the fermentation profile for all cereal silages, but it was less effective than the bacteria at both booting and dough stages of maturity. The reduction (P < 0.001) in in vitro DM digestibility was not as sharp as the decrease in crude protein (CP). Protein A fraction and digestible CP were higher (P < 0.001) at the booting stage, while all B fractions and C fraction were higher (P < 0.001) in cereal silages ensiled at the dough stage. It was concluded that additives, in particular bacterial inoculant, can improve fermentation and protein quality at both stages examined.

Özet

The experiment was conducted to investigate the effects of organic acid and bacterial inoculant on conservation characteristics and protein fractions as defined by the Cornell Net Carbohydrate and Protein System of barley, wheat, rye, triticale, and oat silages ensiled at their booting or dough stage of maturity. The cereal crops were not treated or were treated with bacteria (L. buchneri, L. plantarum, E. faecium) or organic acid (formic acid, propionic acid, sodium formate) and ensiled in 1.0-L anaerobic jars for 45 days. Bacterial inoculant improved the fermentation profile for all cereal silages and increased the dry matter (DM) recovery at both maturity stages. The benefit of bacteria inclusion in the silage was more pronounced when applied at dough stages. Organic acid also improved the fermentation profile for all cereal silages, but it was less effective than the bacteria at both booting and dough stages of maturity. The reduction (P < 0.001) in in vitro DM digestibility was not as sharp as the decrease in crude protein (CP). Protein A fraction and digestible CP were higher (P < 0.001) at the booting stage, while all B fractions and C fraction were higher (P < 0.001) in cereal silages ensiled at the dough stage. It was concluded that additives, in particular bacterial inoculant, can improve fermentation and protein quality at both stages examined.

🔖

Cite This Article

KELEŞ, G., COŞKUN, B., İNAL, F., ALATAŞ, M. S., ATEŞ, S. (2014). Conservation characteristics and protein fractions of cereal silages ensiled with additives at the booting and dough stages of maturity. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3, 285–294. https://ajindex.com/articles/121578

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Helsel ZR, Thomas JW. Small grains for forage. J Dairy Sci 1987; 70: 2330–2338.
  2. Crovetto GM, Glassi G, Rapetti L, Sandrucci A, Tamburini A. Effect of stage of maturity on the nutritive value of whole crop wheat silage. Livest Prod Sci 1998; 55: 21–32.
  3. Beck PA, Steward, CB, Gray HC, Smith JL, Gunter SA. Effect of wheat forage maturity and preservation method on forage chemical composition and performance of growing calves fed mixed diets. J Anim Sci 2009; 87: 4133–4142.
  4. Khorasani GR, Jedel PE, Helm JH, Kennelly JJ. Influence of stage of maturity on yield components and chemical composition of cereal grain silages. Can J Anim Sci 1997; 77: 259–267.
  5. Tremblay GF, Michaud R, Belanger G. Protein fractions and ruminal undegradable proteins in alfalfa. Can J Plant Sci 2003; 83: 555–559.
  6. Guo XS, Ding WR, Han JG, Zhou H. Characterization of protein fractions and amino acids in ensiled alfalfa treated with different chemical additives. Anim Feed Sci Tech 2008; 142: 89–98.
  7. McDonald P, Henderson N, Heron SJR. The Biochemistry of Silage. Marlow, UK: Chalcombe Publications; 1991. O’Kiely P. A note on the conservation characteristics of physiologically immature forage maize ensiled with different additives. Irish J Agric Food Res 1998; 37: 237–242. Haigh PM. Effects of herbage water-soluble carbohydrate content and weather conditions at ensilage on the fermentation of grass silages made on commercial farms. Grass Forage Sci 1990; 45: 263–271.
  8. Davies DR, Merry RJ, Williams AP, Bakewell EL, Leemans DK, Tweed JKS. Proteolysis during ensilage of forages varying in soluble sugar content. J Dairy Sci 1997; 81: 444–453. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 17th ed. 2nd rev. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: Association of Analytical Communities; 2003.
  9. Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Method for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nostarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991; 74: 3583–3597.
  10. Licitra G, Hernandez T, Van Soest P. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractioning of ruminal feeds. Anim Feed Sci Tech 1996; 57: 347–358.
  11. Barker SB, Summerson WH. The colorimetric method for determination of lactic acid in biological material. J Biol Chem 1941; 138: 535–554.
  12. Dubois M, Giles KA, Hamilton JK, Rebbers PA, Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal Chem 1956; 28: 350–356. Weatherburn MW. Phenol-hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Anal Chem 1967; 39: 971–974. Sn