Is There a Difference in the Implant Related Complication Rates Between the Locally Manufactured Plate Systems and Overseas Counterparts in the Treatment of Forearm Fracture?
ÖNKOL KIRIK TEDAVİSİNDE YERLİ ÜRETİM PLAK SİSTEMLERİ İLE YURT DIŞI ÜRETİM MUADİLLERİ ARASINDA İMPLANT İLİŞKİLİ KOMPLİKASYONLAR AÇISINDAN FARK VAR MI?
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare early results and implant-related complication rates of CE certified locally manufactured orthopedic implants, and overseas manufactured systems with proven efficacy and reliability via clinical studies in the surgical fixation of forearm fractures.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare early results and implant-related complication rates of CE certified locally manufactured orthopedic implants, and overseas manufactured systems with proven efficacy and reliability via clinical studies in the surgical fixation of forearm fractures.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare early results and implant-related complication rates of CE certified locally manufactured orthopedic implants, and overseas manufactured systems with proven efficacy and reliability via clinical studies in the surgical fixation of forearm fractures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare early results and implant-related complication rates of CE certified locally manufactured orthopedic implants, and overseas manufactured systems with proven efficacy and reliability via clinical studies in the surgical fixation of forearm fractures.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Radius kırıkları · ulna kırıkları · açık kırık redüksiyonu
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare early results and implant-related complication rates of CE certified locally manufactured orthopedic implants, and overseas manufactured systems with proven efficacy and reliability via clinical studies in the surgical fixation of forearm fractures.
Özet
Amaç: Önkol kırıkları cerrahi tespitinde CE belgeli yerli üretim ortopedik implantlar ile klinik çalışmalarla etkinliği ve güvenilirliği ispatlanmış yurt dışı üretim sistemlerinin erken dönem sonuçlarını ve implant ile ilişkili komplikasyon oranlarını karşılaştırmak amaçlandı.
Karakuş, Ö., Sarı, A. S. (2021). Is There a Difference in the Implant Related Complication Rates Between the Locally Manufactured Plate Systems and Overseas Counterparts in the Treatment of Forearm Fracture?. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2, 327–337. https://doi.org/10.24938/kutfd.772030
Freese KP, Faulk LW, Palmer C, Baschal RM, Sibbel SE. A comparison of fixation methods in adolescent patients with diaphyseal forearm fractures. Injury. 2018;49(11):2053-7.
Zheng W, Tao Z, Chen C, Zhang C, Zhang H, Feng Z et al. Comparison of three surgical fixation methods for dual-bone forearm fractures in older children: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2018;51(3):10-6.
Marcheix PS, Delclaux S, Ehlinger M, Scheibling B, Dalmay F, Hardy J et al. Pre- and postoperative complications of adult forearm fractures treated with plate fixation. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102(6):781-4.
Zhao L, Wang B, Bai X, Liu Z, Gao H, Li Y. Plate fixation versus ıntramedullary nailing for both-bone forearm fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies. World J Surg. 2017;41(3):722-33.
Zhang XF, Huang JW, Mao HX, Chen WB, Luo Y. Adult diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures: A clinical and biomechanical comparison of four different fixations. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102(3):319-25.
Behnke NM, Redjal HR, Nguyen VT, Zinar DM. Internal fixation of diaphyseal fractures of the forearm: a retrospective comparison of hybrid fixation versus dual plating. J Orthop Trauma. 2012;26(11):611-6.