Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4

Scenario of porcine cysticercosis and human taeniasis in Maharashtra State, India

Pages
353–358
Publication Date
2018-08-09
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The overall prevalence of cysticercosis in pigs was found to be 0.88% by postmortem examination and 0.9% by PCR assay, whereas prevalence of taeniasis in humans was 3.15% by ELISA and 2.04% by PCR.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Cysticercosis/taeniasis is one of the neglected parasitic zoonoses in developing countries like India.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A study was conducted for a period of 7 years from 2010 to 2017 during which 13,596 pig and 1238 human samples were screened to learn the exact scenario of cysticercosis/taeniasis in the different regions of Maharashtra State.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The overall prevalence of cysticercosis in pigs was found to be 0.88% by postmortem examination and 0.9% by PCR assay, whereas prevalence of taeniasis in humans was 3.15% by ELISA and 2.04% by PCR.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Cysticercosis · pigs · humans

Abstract

Cysticercosis/taeniasis is one of the neglected parasitic zoonoses in developing countries like India. A study was conducted for a period of 7 years from 2010 to 2017 during which 13,596 pig and 1238 human samples were screened to learn the exact scenario of cysticercosis/taeniasis in the different regions of Maharashtra State. Prevalence of cysticercosis/taeniasis in pigs and humans was recorded using various diagnostic methods such as meat inspection and serological methods involving ELISA. The overall prevalence of cysticercosis in pigs was found to be 0.88% by postmortem examination and 0.9% by PCR assay, whereas prevalence of taeniasis in humans was 3.15% by ELISA and 2.04% by PCR. As compared to the previous reports from the state, the findings of the present study revealed a lowered prevalence of the disease in both the human and the pig population. It was concluded that the declining trend of cysticercosis in Maharashtra State was the outcome of the implementation of appropriate and sustainable public health interventions achieved through demonstrations and the distribution of booklets in the vernacular language.

🔖

Cite This Article

VAIDYA, V., PATURKAR, A., ZENDE, R., GATNE, M., DIGHE, D., WAGHMARE, R., MOON, S., BHAVE, S., JADHAV, P., WAVHAL, N. (2018). Scenario of porcine cysticercosis and human taeniasis in Maharashtra State, India. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4, 353–358. https://ajindex.com/articles/121461

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Khaing TA, Bawm S, Wai SS, Htut Y, Htun LL. Epidemiological survey on porcine cysticercosis in Nay Pyi Taw Area, Myanmar. J Vet Med 2015; 2015: 340828. García HH, Gonzalez AE, Evans CAW, Gilman RH. Taenia solium cysticercosis. Lancet 2003; 362: 547-556.
  2. Singh BB, Sharma R, Sharma JK, Juyal PD. Parasitic zoonoses in India: an overview. Rev Sci Tech 2010; 29: 629-637.
  3. Singh BB, Ghatak S, Banga HS, Gill JPS, Singh B. Veterinary urban hygiene: a challenge for India. Rev Sci Tech 2013; 32: 645-656.
  4. Sarti E, Rajshekhar V. Measures for the prevention and control of Taenia solium taeniosis and cysticercosis. Acta Tropica 2003; 87: 137-143.
  5. Sreedevi C, Hafeez M, Anand Kumar P, Rayulu VC, Subramanyam KV, Sudhakar K. PCR test for detecting Taenia solium cysticercosis in pig carcasses. Trop Anim Health Prod 2012; 44: 95-99.
  6. Yamasaki H, Allan JC, Sato MO, Nakao M, Sako Y, Nakaya K, Qui D, Mamuti W, Craig PS, Ito A. DNA differential diagnosis of taeniasis and cysticercosis by multiplex PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2004; 42: 548-553.
  7. Sreedevi C, Hafeez M, Subramanyam KV, Anand Kumar P, Chengalva Rayulu V. Development and evaluation of flow through assay for detection of antibodies against porcine cysticercosis. Trop Biomed 2011; 28: 160-170.
  8. Towbin H, Stachelin T, Gordon J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gel to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and cone applications. P Nati Acad Sci USA 1979; 76: 4350-4354. Agudelo-Flórez P, Palacio LG. Dot blot for the diagnosis of porcine cysticercosis. Rev Sci Tech 2009; 28: 1077-1084.
  9. Fernando SA, Lindh L. Taenia solium: a two-dimensional western blotting method combined with the use of an EST- library for the identification of immunogenic proteins recognized by sera from neurocysticercosis patients. Exp Parasitol 2011; 128: 371-376. Thrusfield M. Veterinary Epidemiology. 3rd ed. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Sciences Ltd.; 2007.
  10. Deka DK, Shrivastava GC, Chhabra RC. Incidence of hydatidosis in ruminants. Ind J Ani Sci 1983; 53: 200-202.
  11. Pathak KML, Gaur SNS, Kumar D. The epidemiology of strobillar and cystic phase of Taenia solium in certain parts of Uttar Pradesh. Ind J Vet Med 1984; 4: 17-18.
  12. Pathak KM, Gaur SN. Prevalence and economic implications of Taenia solium taeniasis and cysticercosis in Uttar Pradesh State of India. Acta Leiden 1989; 57: 197-200. D’Souza PE, Hafeez M. Incidence of Cysticercus cellulosae infection in pigs in Andhra Pradesh. Mysore J Agri Sci 1998; 32: 75-78.
  13. Sharma R, Sharma DK, Juyal PD, Sharma