Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4

Genetic diversity of different avian strains of Pasteurella multocida recovered during four outbreaks in India

Pages
310–318
Publication Date
2018-08-09
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that different strains might have been involved in the different outbreaks reported in the study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Pasteurella multocida causes fowl cholera in avian species and type A is predominantly reported from outbreaks of fowl cholera.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 36 isolates were recovered from the outbreaks, including one isolate from a parakeet, which was also subjected to characterization by conventional and molecular analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that different strains might have been involved in the different outbreaks reported in the study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Pasteurella multocida · ERIC-PCR · REP-PCR

Abstract

Pasteurella multocida causes fowl cholera in avian species and type A is predominantly reported from outbreaks of fowl cholera. Biochemical, serological, and molecular methods are employed for its diagnosis and typing. Utilizing rapid molecular tools like repetitive extragenic palindromic (REP) PCR and enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus (ERIC) PCR, P. multocida isolates from four outbreaks (three from Chennai and one from Ahmadabad, India) were characterized and typed to determine their relationships. A total of 36 isolates were recovered from the outbreaks, including one isolate from a parakeet, which was also subjected to characterization by conventional and molecular analysis. All of the isolates were found to be capsular type A based on PCR assay capsular typing. ERIC- and REP-PCR showed differences in the banding patterns among different outbreak isolates, and also among the geographical regions. Differences were also noticed among different host species, as the banding pattern in the ERIC- and REP-PCR differed; the analysis of results also revealed the same. All of the isolates were found to be sensitive to enrofloxacin and cefotaxime among the antibiotics used in the study. It was found that different strains might have been involved in the different outbreaks reported in the study. The results show that molecular typing methods like ERIC- and REP-PCR are useful epidemiological tools for classifying the strains.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARTHIK, K., DILLIBABU, V., MAHAPRABHU, R., BHARATHI, R., MANIMARAN, K., SHOBA, K. (2018). Genetic diversity of different avian strains of Pasteurella multocida recovered during four outbreaks in India. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 4, 310–318. https://ajindex.com/articles/121456

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Wang C, Wu Y, Xing X, Hu G, Dai J, He H. An outbreak of avian cholera in wild waterfowl in Ordos Wetland, Inner Mongolia, China. J Wildlife Dis 2009; 45: 1194-1197.
  2. Ozyildiz Z, Tel OY, Yilmaz R, Ozsoy SY, Keskin O. Pathological and microbiological investigations of pneumonic pasteurellosis in sheep. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak 2013; 19: 103-108.
  3. Rimler RB, Glisson JR. Fowl cholera. In: Calnek BW, Barnes HJ, Beard CW, Mcdougald LR, Saif YM, editors. Diseases of Poultry. 10th ed. Ames, IA, USA: Iowa State University Press; 1997. pp. 143-159.
  4. Shivachandra SB, Kumar AA, Gautam R, Saxena MK, Chaudhuri P, Srivastava SK. Detection of multiple strains of Pasteurella multocida in fowl cholera outbreaks by polymerase chain reaction-based typing. Avian Pathol 2005; 34: 456-462.
  5. Srinivasan P, Gopalakrishnamurthy TR, Mohan B, Saravanan S. Occurrence of subacute fowl cholera in a broiler flock. Tamil Nadu J Vet Animal Sci 2011; 7: 45-47. Carter GR. Studies on Pasteurella multocida. I. A haemagglutination test for the identification of serological types. Am J Vet Res 1955; 16: 481-484.
  6. Sellyei B, Varga Z, Ivanics E, Magyar T. Characterisation and comparison of avian Pasteurella multocida strains by conventional and ERIC-PCR assays. Acta Vet Hung 2008; 56: 429-440.
  7. Shivachandra SB, Kumar AA, Chaudhuri P. Molecular characterization of avian strains of Pasteurella multocida serogroup-A:1 based on amplification of repetitive regions by PCR. Comp Immunol Microbiol Inf Dis 2008; 31: 47-62.
  8. Varga Z, Volokhov DV, Stipkovits L, Thuma A, Sellyei B, Magyar T. Characterization of Pasteurella multocida strains isolated from geese. Vet Microbiol 2013; 163: 149-156.
  9. Mohamed MWA, Mageed MAAMA. Molecular analysis of Pasteurella multocida strains isolated from fowl cholera infection in backyard chickens. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed 2014; 4: 8-12.
  10. Singh R, Blackall PJ, Remington B, Turni C. Studies on the presence and persistence of Pasteurella multocida serovars and genotypes in fowl cholera outbreaks. Avian Pathol 2013; 42: 581-585.
  11. Shirzad-Aski H, Tabatabaei M. Molecular characterization of Pasteurella multocida isolates obtained from poultry, ruminant, cats and dogs using RAPD and REP-PCR analysis. Mol Biol Res Commun 2016; 5: 123-132.
  12. Muhairwa AP, Christensen JP, Bisgaard M. Investigations on the carrier rate of Pasteurella multocida in healthy commercial poultry flocks and flocks affected by fowl cholera. Avian Pathol 2000; 29: 133-142.
  13. Zhang PJ, Fegan N, Fraser I, Duffy P, Gordon A, Ketterer P