Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2015 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 4

Storage stability of aerobically packaged extended dehydrated chickenmeat rings at ambient temperature

Pages
493–500
Publication Date
2015-08-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Days of storage significantly (P < 0.01) affected pH value, moisture content, TBARS value, peroxide value, appearance (of both dried and rehydrated and cooked products), flavor, texture, meat flavor intensity, and juiciness and also affected the overall acceptability (P < 0.05) of the products during storage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study was conducted to evaluate the storage stability of aerobically packaged extended dehydrated chicken meat rings during ambient storage at 30 ± 2 °C.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Extended dehydrated chicken meat rings were prepared by utilizing spent hen meat (80%), an optimized level of rice flour, refined wheat flour, potato starch, spice mix, common salt, and sodium tripolyphosphate.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Days of storage significantly (P < 0.01) affected pH value, moisture content, TBARS value, peroxide value, appearance (of both dried and rehydrated and cooked products), flavor, texture, meat flavor intensity, and juiciness and also affected the overall acceptability (P < 0.05) of the products during storage.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dehydrated chicken meat ring · spent hen meat · storage study

Abstract

The present study was conducted to evaluate the storage stability of aerobically packaged extended dehydrated chicken meat rings during ambient storage at 30 ± 2 °C. Extended dehydrated chicken meat rings were prepared by utilizing spent hen meat (80%), an optimized level of rice flour, refined wheat flour, potato starch, spice mix, common salt, and sodium tripolyphosphate. The control product was prepared in a similar manner except that rice flour was substituted by an equal quantity of spent hen meat. The products were aerobically packaged in low-density polyethylene (LDPE) pouches and analyzed for physicochemical, microbiological, and sensory characteristics at regular intervals of 0, 15, 30, and 45 days during storage. Significant (P < 0.01) effects of treatments on the moisture content, thiobarbituric acid reacting substance (TBARS) value, peroxide value, total plate count, and yeast and mold count and also on the pH (P < 0.05) of the products were noticed. Days of storage significantly (P < 0.01) affected pH value, moisture content, TBARS value, peroxide value, appearance (of both dried and rehydrated and cooked products), flavor, texture, meat flavor intensity, and juiciness and also affected the overall acceptability (P < 0.05) of the products during storage. Treatment × storage days interaction significantly (P < 0.01) affected moisture content of the dehydrated chicken meat rings during storage. These observations indicated that the product can be stored in aerobically packaged LDPE pouches for 45 days without much change in physicochemical, microbiological, and sensory properties.

Özet

The present study was conducted to evaluate the storage stability of aerobically packaged extended dehydrated chicken meat rings during ambient storage at 30 ± 2 °C. Extended dehydrated chicken meat rings were prepared by utilizing spent hen meat (80%), an optimized level of rice flour, refined wheat flour, potato starch, spice mix, common salt, and sodium tripolyphosphate. The control product was prepared in a similar manner except that rice flour was substituted by an equal quantity of spent hen meat. The products were aerobically packaged in low-density polyethylene (LDPE) pouches and analyzed for physicochemical, microbiological, and sensory characteristics at regular intervals of 0, 15, 30, and 45 days during storage. Significant (P < 0.01) effects of treatments on the moisture content, thiobarbituric acid reacting substance (TBARS) value, peroxide value, total plate count, and yeast and mold count and also on the pH (P < 0.05) of the products were noticed. Days of storage significantly (P < 0.01) affected pH value, moisture content, TBARS value, peroxide value, appearance (of both dried and rehydrated and cooked products), flavor, texture, meat flavor intensity, and juiciness and also affected the overall acceptability (P < 0.05) of the products during storage. Treatment × storage days interaction significantly (P < 0.01) affected moisture content of the dehydrated chicken meat rings during storage. These observations indicated that the product can be stored in aerobically packaged LDPE pouches for 45 days without much change in physicochemical, microbiological, and sensory properties.

🔖

Cite This Article

MISHRA, B. P., CHAUHAN, G., MENDIRATTA, S. K., RATH, P. K., NAYAR, R. (2015). Storage stability of aerobically packaged extended dehydrated chickenmeat rings at ambient temperature. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 4, 493–500. https://ajindex.com/articles/121385

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Vadivambal R, Jayas DS. Changes in quality of micro wave- treated agricultural products - a review. Biosyst Eng 2007; 98: 1–16.
  2. Singh VP, Sanyal MK, Dubey PC. Quality of chicken snack containing broiler spent hen meat, rice flour and sodium caseinate. J Food Sci Technol 2002; 39: 442–444.
  3. Sharma BD, Nanda PK. Studies on the development and storage stability of chicken chips. Indian J Poult Sci 2002; 37: 155–158.
  4. Lee SO, Min JS, Kim IS, Lee M. Physical evaluation of popped cereal snacks with spent hen meat. Meat Sci 2003; 64: 383–390.
  5. Das H, Jayaraman S. A study on the quality and stability of convenience dehydrated chicken pulav. J Food Sci Technol 2003; 40: 97–101.
  6. Modi VK, Sachindra NM, Nagegowda P, Mahendrakar NS, Rao DN. Quality changes during the storage of dehydrated chicken kebab mix. Int J Food Sci Technol 2007; 42: 827–835.
  7. Hameed RS, Kanchana S, Vennila P, Hemalatha G. Storage stability of dehydrated chicken chunks in different packaging materials. Indian Vet J 2007; 84: 1283–1285. Kerr RW. Chemistry and Industry of Starch. 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press; 1950.
  8. Hansen LP, Hosek R, Callan M, Jones FT. The development of high protein rice flour for early childhood feeding. Food Technol 1981; 35: 38–42. Council of Australian Food Technology Associations Rice Flour Used Successfully in Emulsified Fresh Sausage. Food Technology in Australia 1986; 38: 229. Yokoyama W. Nutritional properties of rice and rice bran. In: Champagne ET, editor. Rice: Chemistry and Technology. St. Paul, MN, USA: American Association of Cereal Chemists; 2004. pp. 595–609.
  9. Berwal JS, Dhanda JS, Berwal RK. Studies on rice and turkey meat blend papads. J Food Sci Technol 1996; 33: 237–239.
  10. Kumar RR, Sharma BD. Evaluation of the efficacy of sorghum flour as extender in chicken patties. Indian J Meat Sci 2005; 3: 17–20.
  11. Dogan SF, Sahin S, Sumnu G. Effects of soy and rice flour addition on batter rheology and quality of deep-fat fried chicken nuggets. J Food Eng 2005; 71: 127–132.
  12. Rozbeh M, Kalchayanand N, Field RA, Johnson MC, Ray B. The influence of bio preservatives on the bacterial level of refrigerated vacuum packaged beef. J Food Safety 1993; 13: 99–111.
  13. Tarladgis BG, Watts BM, Younathan MT, Dugan LR. A distillation method for the quantitative determination of malonaldehyde in rancid foods. J Am Oil Chem Soc 1960; 37: 44–48. Koniecko EK. Handbook for Meat Chemists. Wayne, NJ, USA: Avery Publishing Group; 1979. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th ed. Rockville,