Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 3

Control of fermented sausage, salami, sausage, and hamburger meatballs produced in meat production facilities applying the ISO Food Security System for food pathogens

Pages
337–344
Publication Date
2017-06-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These results indicate that the ISO system by itself is not an effective food security system for public health.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, fermented sausage, salami, sausage, and hamburger meatballs produced by 6 different companies were assessed for pathogen contamination.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These firms were either International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 22000-compliant or non-ISO 22000 compliant.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These results indicate that the ISO system by itself is not an effective food security system for public health.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:96 samples
⚙️Variables:Meat products · food safety · International Organization for Standardization 22000

Abstract

In this study, fermented sausage, salami, sausage, and hamburger meatballs produced by 6 different companies were assessed for pathogen contamination. These firms were either International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 22000-compliant or non-ISO 22000 compliant. Samples were taken 4 times over 4 seasons. The total mesophilic aerobic quantities of Bacillus cereus, Clostridium perfringens, and Staphylococcus aureus, along with the presence of Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, and Escherichia coli O157:H7, were tested in each sample. In 96 samples, Salmonella spp. (3.12%), L. monocytogenes (17.7%), and E. coli O157:H7 (4.16%) were detected. From the ISO-certified firms, Salmonella spp. were detected in one meatball (8.33%). L. monocytogenes was detected in 7 meatballs (58.31%), one sausage (8.33%), and one salami (8.33%). E. coli O157:H7 was detected in one meatball (8.33%) and one sausage (8.33%). These results indicate that the ISO system by itself is not an effective food security system for public health. All applications of food security related to consumer health are important and must be ensured at all stages of the supply chain, from the general health conditions of animals to the end delivery of products for the consideration of conscious customers.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÖRÜK, N. G., GÜNER, A. (2017). Control of fermented sausage, salami, sausage, and hamburger meatballs produced in meat production facilities applying the ISO Food Security System for food pathogens. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 3, 337–344. https://ajindex.com/articles/121364

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Tayar M, Yibar A. Evaluation of food safety in the EU harmonization process. Veterinarians Association Journal 2008; 2: 22-29. Erol İ. Gıda Hijyeni ve Mikrobiyolojisi. 1st ed. Ankara, Turkey: Pozitif; 2007 (in Turkish). Wilcock A, Pun M, Khanona J, Aung M. Consumer attitudes knowledge and behavior: a review of food safety issues. Trends Food Sci Tech 2004; 15: 56-66.
  2. Marvin HJP, Kleter GA, Prandini A, Dekkers S, Bolton DJ. Early identification system for emerging foodborne hazards. Food Chem Toxicol 2009; 47: 915-926.
  3. Panisello PJ, Rooney R, Quantick PC, Stanwell-Smih R. Application of foodborne disease outbreak data in the development and maintenance of HACCP systems. Int J Food Microbiol 2000; 59: 221 Sperber WH. HACCP does not work from farm to table. Food Control 2005; 16: 511-514. Doménech E, Amorós JA, Gonzalvo MP, Escriche I. Implementation and effectiveness of the HACCP and pre- requisites in food establishments. Food Control 2011; 22: 1419- 1423. Güngör E, Gökoğlu N. Determination of microbial contamination sources at a Frankfurter sausage processing line. Turk J Vet Anim Sci 2010; 34: 53-59. Nortjé GL, Vorster SM, Greebe RP, Steyn PL. Occurrence of Bacillus cereus and Yersinia enterocolitica in South African retail meats. Food Microbiol 1999; 16: 213-217.
  4. Jalali M, Abedi D, Pourbakhsh SA, Ghoukasin K. Prevalence of Salmonella spp. in raw and cooked foods in Isfahan-Iran. J Food Safety 2008; 28: 442-452.
  5. Gibbons IS, Adesiyun A, Seepersadsingh N, Rahaman S. Investigation for possible source(s) of contamination of ready- to-eat products with Listeria spp. and other pathogens in a meat processing plant in Trinidad. Food Microbiol 2006; 23: 359-366.
  6. Scanga JA, Grona AD, Belk KE, Sofos JN, Bellinger GR, Smith GC. Microbiological contamination of raw beef trimmings and ground beef. Meat Sci 2000; 56: 145-152.
  7. Keleş A, Uçar G, Güner A. Investigations on the presence of E. coli O157: H7 in İnegöl and hamburger meat balls. Eurasian. Vet Bil Derg 2006; 22: 51-57 (in Turkish with English abstract). Food and Agricultural Organization. Manual of Food Quality Control. 4. Rev. 1. Microbiological Analyses. Rome, Italy: FAO; 1992. Food and Drug Administration. Aerobic Plate Count. Bacteriological Analytical Manual. Chapter 3. Washington, DC, USA: FDA; 2001.
  8. Bennet RW, Hait J. Staphylococcal enterotoxins: manual microslide double diffusionand ELISA-based methods. In: Bennet RW, Hait J, editors. Bacteriological Analytical Manual. Washington, DC, USA: FDA; 2011. Avai