Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 1

First evidence of histological and histochemical intraspecific differences in salivary glands in Brown Norway and albino Wistar rats

Pages
34–39
Publication Date
2018-02-16
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our study highlighted intraspecific histological and histochemical differences in salivary glands from two rat strains bred and fed in identical conditions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The size of salivary glands, acinar structure, and secretion particularities differ from one species to another and are influenced by diet and environment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Histochemically, we observed that cells in the parotid gland present a moderate PAS-positive reaction only in Wistar rat.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our study highlighted intraspecific histological and histochemical differences in salivary glands from two rat strains bred and fed in identical conditions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Brown Norway rat · mandibular · parotid

Abstract

The size of salivary glands, acinar structure, and secretion particularities differ from one species to another and are influenced by diet and environment. In order to investigate whether there are histological or histochemical differences in the salivary glands of animals from the same species, bred in identical conditions of environment and diet, we assessed two laboratory rat strains. The salivary glands from two rat strains were processed for histological and histochemical investigations. Histologically, we noticed differences in the parotid gland: seromucous acini were present in Brown Norway rat and typical serous ones in Wistar rat. Histochemically, we observed that cells in the parotid gland present a moderate PAS-positive reaction only in Wistar rat. In the mandibular gland, the size and shape of the acini were similar, whereas the cytoplasm of acinar and granular duct cells was PAS-positive in both rat strains, but with different intensities. In the sublingual gland, both PAS and Alcian blue reactions were positive in the two rat strains, with a higher intensity in the Brown Norway strain. Our study highlighted intraspecific histological and histochemical differences in salivary glands from two rat strains bred and fed in identical conditions.

🔖

Cite This Article

RUXANDA, F., RAŢIU, C., MATOSZ, B., CONSTANTINESCU, R., MICLĂUŞ, V. (2018). First evidence of histological and histochemical intraspecific differences in salivary glands in Brown Norway and albino Wistar rats. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 1, 34–39. https://ajindex.com/articles/121322

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Da Cunha Lima M, Sottovia-Filho D, Cestari TM, Taga R. Morphometric characterization of sexual differences in the rat sublingual gland. Braz Oral Res 2004; 18: 53-58.
  2. Shackleford JM, Klapper CE. Structure and carbohydrate histochemistry of mammalian salivary glands. Am J Anat 1962; 111: 25-48.
  3. Tandler B, Nagato T, Toyoshima K, Phillips CJ. Comparative ultrastructure of intercalated ducts in major salivary glands: a review. Anat Rec 1998; 252: 64-91.
  4. Denny PC, Ball WD, Redman RS. Salivary glands: a paradigm for diversity of gland development. Crit Rev Oral Biol M 1997; 8: 51-75.
  5. Wolff MS, Mirels L, Lagner J, Hand AR. Development of the rat sublingual gland: a light and electron microscopic immunocytochemical study. Anat Rec 2002; 266: 30-42. Phillips CJ. Cells, molecules, and adaptive radiation in mammals. In: Baker RJ, Genoways HH, editors. Contributions in Mammalogy: A Memorial Volume Honoring Dr. J. Knox Jones Jr. Lubbock, TX, USA: Museum of Texas Tech University; 1996. pp. 1-24.
  6. Tandler B, Gresik EW, Nagato T, Phillips CJ. Secretion by striated ducts of mammalian major salivary glands: review from an ultrastructural, functional, and evolutionary perspective. Anat Rec 2001; 264: 121-145.
  7. Amano O, Mizobe K, Bando Y, Sakiyama K. Anatomy and histology of rodent and human major salivary glands. Acta Histochem Cytoc 2012; 45: 241-250.
  8. Humphrey SP, Williamson RT. A review of saliva: normal composition, flow, and function. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 162- 169. Tache S. Fiziologia glandelor salivare. 1st ed. Cluj-Napoca, Romania: Editura Dacia; 1994 (in Romanian). Taga R, Sesso A. Postnatal development of the rat sublingual glands. A morphometric and radioautographic study. Arch Histol Cytol 1998; 61: 417-426.
  9. Treuting PM, Dintzis SM. Salivary glands. In: Treuting PM, Dintzis SM, editors. Comparative Anatomy and Histology. A Mouse and Human Atlas. Washington, DC, USA: Academic Press; 2012. pp. 111-120.
  10. Coire FAS, Umemura ALO, Cestari TM, Taga R. Increase in the cell volume of the rat submandibular gland during postnatal development. Braz J Morphol Sci 2003; 20: 37-42.
  11. Al-Saffar FJ, Simawy MSH. Histomorphological and histochemical study of the major salivary glands of adult local rabbits. Int J Adv Res 2014; 2: 378-402.
  12. Zhang X, Li J, Liu XY, Sun YL, Zhang CM, Wang SL. Morphological characteristics of submandibular glands of miniature pig. Chin Med J 2005; 118: 1368-1373.
  13. Khojasteh SMB, Delashoub M. Microscopic anatomy of the parotid and submandibular salivary gl