SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 11 Sayı: 21

INCOME INEQUALITY AND THE NEED FOR NEO-PUBLIC INTERVENTIONISM: COMPARISON OF U.S. AND EUROPE

Zeki Akbakay(Bingöl Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi)0000-0002-6736-6483
Ersin Erkan(Bingöl Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi)0000-0002-9854-0368
Pages
387–409
Publication Date
2020-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When the income inequality of the European countries and the USA are compared, the importance and necessity of the social state becomes concrete.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Historical data show that income inequality has been steadily increasing since the 1980s.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In fact, income inequality has reached the level of the early 20th century in many countries, especially in the USA.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When the income inequality of the European countries and the USA are compared, the importance and necessity of the social state becomes concrete.
🔬Design:Derleme
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Income Inequality · Role of State · Public Policies

Özet

Historical data show that income inequality has been steadily increasing since the 1980s. In fact, income inequality has reached the level of the early 20th century in many countries, especially in the USA. The main reason for this trend is the neo-liberal understanding. With neo-liberal policies, the economic sphere has distanced itself from the public/political sphere and intervention, and has gained so-called autonomy. On the other hand, the increase in income inequality, which is universal, appears in different forms and levels in the USA and Europe. The basis of this differentiation lies in the role of the state in economic and social life. Despite all contradictory discourses, facts and statistics indicate that the state is still an important tool in reducing income inequality. When the income inequality of the European countries and the USA are compared, the importance and necessity of the social state becomes concrete.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akbakay, Z., Erkan, E. (2020). INCOME INEQUALITY AND THE NEED FOR NEO-PUBLIC INTERVENTIONISM: COMPARISON OF U.S. AND EUROPE. Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 21, 387–409. https://doi.org/10.36543/kauiibfd.2020.018

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (32)

  1. Alvaredo, F., L. Chancel, T.Piketty, E. Saez, G. Zuckman (20218). World Inequality Report.2018.
  2. Atkinson, A. B. (2015). Inequality: what can be done?. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  3. Bartels, L. (2008). The New Gilded Age, In Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age (pp. 1-28). Princeton University Press. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7t9ks.4
  4. Bauman, Z. (2013). Does the richness of the fewbenefit us all?. Maldenand Cambridge: Polity.
  5. Bauman, Z. (2005). Work, consumerism and the new poor. Berkshire: Open University Press.
  6. Bucheli, M., Rossi, M. & Amábile, F. J Econ Inequal (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-019-09416-8
  7. Congressional Budget Office (2018). The distribution of household ıncome. 2015 (https://www.cbo.gov/publication/54646)
  8. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity.
  9. Faulkner, N. (2013). A Marxist history of the world: from neanderthals to neoliberals. London: Pluto Press.
  10. Freeman, R. B. (1996). The minimum wage as a redistributive tool. The Economic Journal, Vol. 106, No. 436 (May, 1996), pp. 639-649.
  11. George, V.and Wilding, P. (2002). Globalization and human welfareNew York: Palgrave.
  12. Giddens A.,(2009). Sociology.6th edition, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  13. Gramsci, A. (1995). Further Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Ed. Boothman, USA: University of Minnesota Press.
  14. Greenstone, M. and Looney, A. (2012). Just how progressive is us tax code?.(https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2012/04/13/just-how-progressive-is-the-u-s-tax-code/)
  15. Greig, A., Hulme, D., &Tuner, M. (2007). Challenging global ınequality: development theory and practice in the 21st century.London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  16. Hardt, M. & Negri, N. (2004). Multitude: war and democracy in the age of empire, New York: Penguin Press.
  17. Held, D. (2004). The global covenant: the social democratic alternative to the washington consensus. Cambridge: Polity.
  18. Held, D.,&Kaya, A. (ed.) (2007). Global ınequality: patterns and explanations. Cambridge: Polity.
  19. Heywood, A. (2013). Politics, 4th Edition, New York: Palgrave.
  20. Milanovic, B. (2016). Global Inequality: A new approach for the age of globalization, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  21. OECD (2008). Growing unequal? ıncome distribution and poverty in oecd countries, 2008, OECD Publishing, http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/growingunequalincomedistributionandpovertyinoecdcountries.htm).
  22. OECD (2011), Divided we stand: why ınequality keeps rising, OECD Publishinghttp://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264119536-en).
  23. Piketty, T.,&Saez, E., (2003). Income ınequality in the united states, 1913-1998, Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (1), 1-39.
  24. Piketty, T.,&Saez, E. (2007). How progressive is the u.s. federal tax system? a historical and ınternational perspective. Journal of Economic Perspectives, Volume 21, Winter 2007, pp. 3–24.
  25. Piketty, T., Saez, E. & Stantcheva, S. (2011). Optimal taxation of top labor ıncomes: a tale of three elasticities, NBER Working Paper, No.17616.
  26. Piketty, T. (2014). capital in the twenty-first century,Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  27. Price, M.& Sommeiller, E., (2018). The new gilded age: ıncome inequality in the u.s. by state, metropolitan area, and county. Economic Policy Institute, https://www.epi.org/files/pdf/147963.pdf
  28. Solt, F. (2019). Measuring ıncome ınequality across countries and over time: the standardized world ıncome ınequality database. SWIID Version 8.1
  29. Stiglitz, J. E., (2012). The price of ınequality: how today's divided society endangers our future, New York: W.W. Norton&Company.
  30. Stiglitz, J. E. (2019a). The economy we need, https://www.project-syndicate.org/onpoint/the-economy-we-need-by-joseph-e-stiglitz-2019-05?barrier=accesspaylog
  31. Stiglitz, J. E. (2019b). After neoliberalism, https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/after-neoliberalism-progressive-capitalism-by-joseph-e-stiglitz-2019-05 Wold Inequality Database (2019). https://wid.world/world/#sptinc_p99p100_z/US;FR;DE;CN;ZA;GB;WO/last/eu/k/p/yearly/s/false/5.487/30/curve/false/country
  32. Price, M.& Sommeiller, E., (2018). The new gilded age: ıncome inequality in the u.s. by state, metropolitan area, and county. Economic Policy Institute, https://www.epi.org/files/pdf/147963.pdf