SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 42 Sayı: 2

The impact of social capital on the agricultural production behavior: an empirical practice for Türkiye

Sosyal sermayenin tarımsal üretim davranışı üzerindeki etkisi: Türkiye için ampirik bir uygulama

Hasan Gökhan Doğan(KIRŞEHİR AHİ EVRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5303-1770
Güngör Karakaş(YOZGAT BOZOK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5236-2407
Serhan Candemir(MALATYA TURGUT ÖZAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4248-7024
Zeki Bayramoğlu(SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3258-3848
Kemalettin Ağızan(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2340-2614
Pages
120–132
Publication Date
2025-08-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicated that innovative practices, information gathering activities and environmental practices have a significant positive impact on agricultural production behavior.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main objective of this study is to determine the impact of social capital on the production behavior of agricultural producers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The population of the study consisted of 1345 farms registered in the Farmer Registration System in Onikişubat district of Kahramanmaraş province.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicated that innovative practices, information gathering activities and environmental practices have a significant positive impact on agricultural production behavior.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sosyal sermaye · Tarımsal sürdürülebilirlik · Üretici algısı

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to determine the impact of social capital on the production behavior of agricultural producers. The population of the study consisted of 1345 farms registered in the Farmer Registration System in Onikişubat district of Kahramanmaraş province. As a result of sampling, 225 farms were included in the sample with a confidence interval of 90% and a margin of error of 5%. To achieve this objective, the effects of environmental practices, information gathering activities, innovative practices, intellectual accumulation, neighborhood relations and cultural potential on the agricultural production behavior of producers were analyzed. The results indicated that innovative practices, information gathering activities and environmental practices have a significant positive impact on agricultural production behavior. We emphasize that the structure and characteristics of social capital should be considered and that measures to strengthen social capital should be considered necessary when developing policies related to rural and agricultural production.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, sosyal sermayenin tarımsal üreticilerin üretim davranışları üzerindeki etkisini belirlemektir. Araştırmanın evrenini Kahramanmaraş ili Onikişubat ilçesinde Çiftçi Kayıt Sistemine kayıtlı 1345 işletme oluşturmaktadır. Örnekleme sonucunda %90 güven aralığı ve %5 hata payı ile 225 çiftlik örnekleme dahil edilmiştir. Bu amaca ulaşmak için çevresel uygulamaların, bilgi toplama faaliyetlerinin, yenilikçi uygulamaların, entelektüel birikimin, komşuluk ilişkilerinin ve kültürel potansiyelin üreticilerin tarımsal üretim davranışları üzerindeki etkileri analiz edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, yenilikçi uygulamaların, bilgi toplama faaliyetlerinin ve çevresel uygulamaların tarımsal üretim davranışı üzerinde önemli bir pozitif etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Kırsal ve tarımsal üretimle ilgili politikalar geliştirilirken sosyal sermayenin yapısı ve özelliklerinin dikkate alınması ve sosyal sermayeyi güçlendirecek önlemlerin gerekli görülmesi gerektiği vurgulanmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Doğan, H. G., Karakaş, G., Candemir, S., Bayramoğlu, Z., Ağızan, K., *, S. C. (2025). The impact of social capital on the agricultural production behavior: an empirical practice for Türkiye. Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 42 Sayı: 2, 120–132. https://doi.org/10.55507/gopzfd.1674011

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (87)

  1. Akçaöz, H., Özkan, B., & Kızılay, H. (2005). Tarımsal üretimde çiftçilerin tutum ve davranışları: Çiftçilik amaçları ölçeği (FOS). Anadolu Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15(2), 104–125.
  2. Akinwande, M. O., Dikko, H. G., & Samson, A. (2015). Variance inflation factor: As a condition for the inclusion of suppressor variable(s) in regression analysis. Open Journal of Statistics, 5(7), 754. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojs.2015.57075
  3. Alt, V., Чекусов, М., Balushkina, E., & Исакова, С. (2021). Problems and tasks of using digital technologies in agriculture. Sustainable Development of Mountain Territories, 58, Article 30. https://doi.org/10.25743/sdm.2021.58.30.002
  4. Arrow, K. J., Dasgupta, P., Goulder, L. H., Mumford, K. J., & Oleson, K. (2013). Sustainability and the measurement of wealth: Further reflections. Environment and Development Economics, 18, 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X13000193
  5. Avcı, Y. E., & Yaşar, M. (2014). Kültürel sermaye ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. International Journal of Social Science Research, 3(1), 66–77.
  6. Bala, K., & Kaur, P. (2024). Information and communication technology in smart agriculture: A scientometric review. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 36(18). https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.8136
  7. Berchoux, T., Watmough, G., Johnson, F., Hutton, C., & Atkinson, P. (2019). Collective influence of household and community capitals on agricultural employment as a measure of rural poverty in the Mahanadi Delta, India. Ambio, 49(1), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01150-9
  8. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Faktör analizi: Temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 8(4), 470–483.
  9. Byrne, B. M. (1994). Testing for the factorial validity, replication, and invariance of a measuring instrument: A paradigmatic application based on the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29(3), 289–311.
  10. Carmen, E., Fazey, I., Ross, H., Bedinger, M., Smith, F. M., Prager, K., McClymont, K., & Morrison, D. (2022). Building community resilience in a context of climate change: The role of social capital. Ambio, 51(6), 1371–1387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01678-9
  11. Chávez, V., Arana-Coronado, Ó., Martínez-Damián, M., Garza-Bueno, L., Flores, J., & Santoyo-Cortés, V. (2023). Determinants of agricultural innovation among small farmers in Mexico: An econometric application of the Tobit model. Agrociencia, 57(2). https://doi.org/10.47163/agrociencia.v57i2.2878
  12. Cishahayo, L., Zhu, Y., Zhang, C., & Wang, F. (2023). Impacts of social capital on climate change adaptations of banana farmers in Southern China. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03729-5
  13. Craig, A., Hutton, C., Lewis, L. A., Musa, F. B., & Sheffield, J. (2023). Linking household access to food and social capital typologies in Phalombe District, Malawi. Sustainability Science, 18(4), 1721–1737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01329-w
  14. Cundill, G., Leitch, A. M., Schultz, L., Armitage, D., & Peterson, G. (2015). Principle 5 – Encourage learning. In Principles for building resilience: Sustaining ecosystem services in social-ecological systems. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316014240.008
  15. Doanh, N., Quynh, N., & Pham, T. (2022). Going organic or staying traditionalistic? The role of agriculture information system. International Journal of Social Economics, 49(10), 1458–1478. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-11-2021-0720
  16. Doh, S., & McNeely, C. L. (2012). A multi-dimensional perspective on social capital and economic development: An exploratory analysis. The Annals of Regional Science, 49(3), 821–843. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-011-0449-1
  17. Elshaer, I., Azazz, A., Hassan, S., & Fayyad, S. (2023). Farm-to-fork and sustainable agriculture practices: Perceived economic benefit as a moderator and environmental sustainability as a mediator. Sustainability, 15(14), 11462. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411462
  18. Fu, S., Hua, L., Tan, K., Zhan, Y., Ya-lan, D., & Qi, W. (2018). How social capital affects the quality performance of agricultural products: Evidence from a binary perspective of China. Sustainability, 10(9), 3009. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093009
  19. Fu, S., Ma, R., He, G., Chen, Z., & Hua, L. (2023). A study on the influence of product environmental information transparency on online consumers’ purchasing behavior of green agricultural products. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1168214
  20. Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: A comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29(3), 430–447.
  21. Gebru, B., Yared, M., & Gebremichael, N. (2017). Sources of information and information seeking behavior of smallholder farmers of Tanqa Abergelle Wereda, Central Zone of Tigray, Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, 9(4), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.5897/JAERD2016.0850
  22. Gheyassi, A., & Alambeigi, A. (2024). Social capital and career adaptability: The mediating role of psychological capital. Higher Education Skills and Work-Based Learning, 14(5), 1070–1086. https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-02-2023-0021
  23. Hamilton, K., & Hepburn, C. (2014). Wealth. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 30, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/gru010
  24. Hamilton, K., Ruta, G., Bolt, K., Markandya, A., Pedroso-Galinato, S., Silva, P., Ordoubadi, M. S., Lange, G.-M., & Tajibaeva, L. (2005). Where is the wealth of nations? Measuring capital for the 21st century. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-6354-6
  25. Heliawaty, H., Diansari, P., Salman, D., Rahmadanih, R., & Widyayani, A. R. (2021). The relationship between social capital and objective welfare of cocoa farmer households in Tolada Village, North Luwu Regency, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 316, p. 02029). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131602029
  26. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  27. Hou, Q., Chen, S., Miao, Y., Zhang, Y., Su, C., Fan, X., … Zhang, L. (2023). Management and control of agricultural production space in the Yanhe River Basin based on peasant household behavior. Sustainability, 15(10), 8399. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108399
  28. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  29. Huang, X., Fei, Y., & Fahad, S. (2022). The impact of digital technology use on farmers’ low-carbon production behavior under the background of carbon emission peak and carbon neutrality goals. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.1002181
  30. Idiake-Ochei, O., EA, O., & GO, E. (2016). Information-seeking behaviour of extension personnel in Edo State, Nigeria. Scholars Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Sciences, 3(4), 318–325. https://doi.org/10.21276/sjavs.2016.3.4.10
  31. Isham, J. (2002). The effect of social capital on fertiliser adoption: Evidence from rural Tanzania. Journal of African Economies, 11(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/jae/11.1.39
  32. İzmen, Ü., & Üçdoğruk Gürel, Y. (2023). The importance of linking social capital in unequal and fragmented societies: An analysis of perceived economic well-being in Turkish rural and urban households. The Annals of Regional Science, 70(3), 799–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-019-00964-5
  33. Jankelová, N., & Joniaková, Z. (2021). How to increase production performance of Slovak agricultural companies: The key task of supporting innovative work behavior and information sharing. Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská Ekonomika), 67(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.17221/319/2020-AGRICECON
  34. Jin, H., & Xie, Y. (2023). A review of research on the impact of digitalization on agricultural supply chain security. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. https://doi.org/10.3233/FAIA230038
  35. Kaiser, O. (1974). Isaiah 13–39: A commentary. Westminster John Knox Press.
  36. Kan, M., Özdemir, H.Ö.Ö. 2022. Kırsal Alanda Sosyal Sermayede Meydana Gelen Değişim: Kırşehir İli Mucur İlçesi Örneği. In: Oruç, E., Gözener, B., (Eds), Tarıma Farklı Boyutlardan Sosyo Ekonomik Bakış ve Kırsal Kalkınma, 17. Bölüm, s:307-336, IKSAD Publishing House, Ankara, Türkiye.
  37. Kan, A., Kan, M., Açıkgöz, U. (2021). Kırsal Alanda Sosyal Sermeye ve Toplum 5.0Üzerinden Değerlendirme: Konya İli Akören İlçesi Örneği. In: Yılmaz, O., Şimşek, H., Çark, Ö. (Eds), Sürdürülebilirlik Çalışmaları. 13. Bölüm, s:213-234,Holistence Publications, Çanakkale, Türkiye
  38. Kawarazuka, N., & Prain, G. (2019). Gendered processes of agricultural innovation in the northern uplands of Vietnam. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 11(3), 210–226. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-04-2019-0087
  39. Kehinde, A. D., & Adeyemo, R. (2020). Effects of social capital dimensions on output and gross margin of cassava farmers in Osun State. Nigerian Journal of Rural Sociology, 20(1).
  40. Kimani, S. (2024). The role of agricultural innovation in enhancing food security in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Developing Country Studies, 6(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.47941/ijdcs.2164
  41. Kline, P. (1994). A general description of factor analysis. In An easy guide to factor analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
  42. Klien, C. (2011). Social capital or social cohesion: What matters for subjective well-being (SWB)? CEPS Working Papers, No. 2011/36.
  43. Kolade, O., Harpham, T., & Kibreab, G. (2014). Institutional barriers to successful innovations: Perceptions of rural farmers and key stakeholders in Southwest Nigeria. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 6(4), 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2014.966039
  44. Lawal, T., Abdulsalam, M., Mohammed, A., & Sundararajan, S. (2023). Economic and environmental implications of sustainable agricultural practices in arid regions: A cross-disciplinary analysis of plant science, management, and economics. International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology, 10(3), 3100–3114. https://doi.org/10.15379/ijmst.v10i3.3027
  45. Lei, Z. (2018). Research on the construction of training mode for innovation and entrepreneurship talents in agricultural universities from the perspective of internet+: A breakthrough in Jiangxi Agricultural University. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Seminar on Education, Management and Social Sciences (SSER-18) (pp. 520–523). https://doi.org/10.2991/sser-18.2018.117
  46. Lezoche, M., Hernández, J., Alemany, M., Panetto, H., & Kacprzyk, J. (2020). Agri-food 4.0: A survey of the supply chains and technologies for the future agriculture. Computers in Industry, 117, 103187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2020.103187
  47. Liu, Y., Liu, Z., Liu, J., Qiu, L., Wang, Y., & Fu, X. (2022). Research on the impact of members’ social capital within agricultural cooperatives on their adoption of IPM in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(18), 11538. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811538
  48. Madhavan, S. (2017). Agriculture information needs of farmers: An overview. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research, 7(6), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.24247/ijasrdec201728
  49. Majumdar, K., & Singh, R. (2019). Impact of information and communication technology on marketing of rice. International Journal of Social Economics, 46(9), 1061–1080. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijse-02-2019-0105
  50. Mishra, B., & Bhatta, S. (2021). Agricultural information need of smallholder farmers in Chitwan District, Nepal. International Journal of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology, 9(2), 94–97.
  51. Mouzelis, N. (1995). Sociological Theory: What Went Wrong? London: Routledge&Kegan Paul.
  52. Ogunleye, A., Kehinde, A., Mishra, A., & Ogundeji, A. (2021). Impacts of farmers’ participation in social capital networks on climate change adaptation strategies adoption in Nigeria. Heliyon, 7(12), e08624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08624
  53. Olajide, B. (2011). Assessment of farmers’ access to agricultural information on selected food crops in Iddo District of Oyo State, Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural & Food Information, 12(3–4), 354–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496505.2011.609434
  54. Onyx, J., & Bullen, P. (2000). Measuring social capital in five communities. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886300361002
  55. Ongan, T. N. (2013). Sosyal uyum-sosyal sermaye eksenli kalkınma yaklaşımının sınıfsal sonuçlarına ilişkin bir değerlendirme. Çalışma ve Toplum, 1, 211–228.
  56. Owolade, E., & Arimi, K. (2012). Information-seeking behavior and utilization among snail farmers in Oyo State, Nigeria: Implications for sustainable animal production. Journal of International Agricultural and Extension Education, 19(3), 44–56. https://doi.org/10.5191/jiaee.2012.19304
  57. Oyewole, S., & Sennuga, S. (2020). Factors influencing sustainable agricultural practices among smallholder farmers in Ogun State of Nigeria. Asian Journal of Advances in Agricultural Research, 14(1), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajaar/2020/v14i130120
  58. Pelinescu, E. (2015). The impact of human capital on economic growth. Procedia Economics and Finance, 22, 184–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00258-0
  59. Petrikova, I. (2022). The effects of local-level economic inequality on social capital: Evidence from Andhra Pradesh, India. The European Journal of Development Research, 34(6), 2850–2877. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-021-00495-w
  60. Piñeiro, V., Arias, J., Dürr, J., Elverdin, P., Ibáñez, A., Kinengyere, A., … & Torero, M. (2020). A scoping review on incentives for adoption of sustainable agricultural practices and their outcomes. Nature Sustainability, 3(10), 809–820. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00617-y
  61. Pitkin Derose, K., & Varda, D. M. (2009). Social capital and healthcare access: A systematic review. Medical Care Research and Review, 66(3), 272–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077558708330428
  62. Pospěch, P., & Spěšná, D. (2011). What is the importance of social capital in Czech agriculture? An analysis of selected components. Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská Ekonomika), 57(6), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.17221/163/2010-agricecon
  63. Prasad, R., Bhattacharyya, A., & Nguyen, Q. (2017). Nanotechnology in sustainable agriculture: Recent developments, challenges, and perspectives. Frontiers in Microbiology, 8, 1014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01014
  64. Prayitno, G., Hayat, A., Efendi, A., Tarno, H., & Fauziah, S. (2022). Structural model of social capital and quality of life of farmers in supporting sustainable agriculture (evidence: Sedayulawas village, Lamongan Regency-Indonesia). Sustainability, 14(19), 12487. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912487
  65. Rani, A., Quddoos, A., Yaseen, M. R., Tabassum, S., & Asif, A. (2021). The impact of social capital on household well-being in Pakistan. Social Indicators Research, 158(3), 927–946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02717-4
  66. Rivera, M., Knickel, K., Díaz-Puente, J., & Afonso, A. (2018). The role of social capital in agricultural and rural development: Lessons learnt from case studies in seven countries. Sociologia Ruralis, 59(1), 66–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12218
  67. Romer, P. (1989). Human capital and growth: Theory and evidence. Cambridge, MA. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3173
  68. Roth, F., & Thum, A. (2010). Does intangible capital affect economic growth? CEPS Working Paper.
  69. Ruslan, M., & Khalid, H. (2023). Unpacking social capital as a determinant of sustainable agriculture adoption: A literature review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i6/16903
  70. Ruta, G., & Hamilton, K. (2007). The capital approach to sustainability. In G. Atkinson, S. Dietz, & E. Neumayer (Eds.), Handbook of sustainable development (pp. 45–62).
  71. Kishore, S.M., Renukaswamy, N. S., Kavya, D., Vishnu Priya Kathula, K., Aruna, K. & Abhishek, V. (2024). Addressing climate change: The role of agriculture in greenhouse gas mitigation. Asian Research Journal of Agriculture, 17(4), 731–739. https://doi.org/10.9734/arja/2024/v17i4581
  72. Safruddin, S., Judijanto, L., & Harsono, I. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of the effect of sustainable agricultural practices on farmers' economic sustainability. West Science Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(01), 208–215. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v2i01.609
  73. Saikanth, D., Supriya, S., Singh, B., Kumar, A., Bana, S., Sachan, D., … & Singh, B. (2023). Advancing sustainable agriculture: A comprehensive review for optimizing food production and environmental conservation. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science, 35(16), 417–425. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2023/v35i163169
  74. Sanginga, P. C., Kamugisha, R. N., & Martin, A. M. (2007). The dynamics of social capital and conflict management in multiple resource regimes: A case of the southwestern highlands of Uganda. Ecology and Society, 12, 6.
  75. Sourisseau, J., Gaillard, C., Bouard, S., & Ang, S. (n.d.). [Missing title or publication details] Stojanovic, N. (2021). European Green Deal and "Farm-to-Fork" strategy for a fair, healthy, and environmentally-friendly food system. Collection Papers from Conference Organization on Occasion Day Fac. L., 130.
  76. Sun, X., Lyu, J., & Ge, C. (2022). Knowledge and farmers' adoption of green production technologies: An empirical study on IPM adoption intention in major indica-rice-producing areas in the Anhui province of China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 14292. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114292
  77. Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (Vol. 6, pp. 497-516). Pearson. Teng, Y., Pang, B., Mei, Z., & Guo, X. (2022). Driving mechanism of farmers' green production behavior under normalization of COVID-19 prevention and control: A case study in China. Frontiers in Public Health, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.826846
  78. Tengapoe, K., Baddianaah, I., & Yaradua, A. S. (2024). Access to social capital and smallholder agricultural practices: The case of smallholder farmers in North-Western Ghana. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 10(1), 2353670. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2024.2353670
  79. Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J., & Befort, B. (2011). Global food demand and the sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(50), 20260-20264. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1116437108
  80. Velten, S., Leventon, J., Jager, N., & Newig, J. (2015). What is sustainable agriculture? A systematic review. Sustainability, 7(6), 7833-7865. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7067833
  81. Wang, H., Zhao, Y., & Shao, C. (2022). IoT for agricultural information generation and recommendation: A deep learning-based approach. Mobile Information Systems, 2022, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7378755
  82. Willock, J., Deary, I. J., Edwards-Jones, G., Gibson, G. J., McGregor, M. J., Sutherland, A., Dent, J. B., Morgan, O., & Grieve, R. (1999). The role of attitudes and objectives in farmer decision making: Business and environmentally-oriented behavior in Scotland. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 50(2), 286-303.
  83. Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27(2), 151–208. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006884930135
  84. Yan, B., Yan, C., Ke, C., & Tan, X. (2016). Information sharing in the supply chain of agricultural products based on the internet of things. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(7), 1397-1416. https://doi.org/10.1108/imds-12-2015-0512
  85. Yu, H., Zhang, W., & Pang, S. (2022). Exploring the role of land transfer and social capital in improving agricultural income under the background of rural revitalization. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), 17077. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192417077
  86. Zhang, L., Wei-min, Z., Jin, Z., Su, Y., & Chen, H. (2021). A research on traceability technology of agricultural products supply chain based on blockchain and IPFS. Security and Communication Networks, 2021, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3298514
  87. Zugravu-Soilita, N., Kafrouni, R., Bouard, S., & Apithy, L. (2021). Do cultural capital and social capital matter for economic performance? An empirical investigation of tribal agriculture in New Caledonia. Ecological Economics, 182, 106933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106933