Journals / Gazi Akademik Bakış / 2025 / Cilt: 19 Sayı: 37

Political Projections of the February 6 Earthquake in Türkiye in the Context of Political Competition and Political Polarization

Politik Rekabet-Politik Kutuplaşma Geriliminde Türkiye’deki 6 Şubat Depremin Politik İzdüşümleri

Fatih Ertugay(SIVAS CUMHURIYET UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCES)0000-0001-8469-4393
Pages
361–386
Publication Date
2025-12-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The main motivation of the study is to uncover the appearance and consequences of political polarization during extreme events, focusing on the context of the February 6 earthquake.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The healthy functioning of democracy relies on the healthy functioning of political competition.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In Türkiye, one of the most significant challenges faced by democracy is that political competition has deviated from its normal democratic boundaries.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The main motivation of the study is to uncover the appearance and consequences of political polarization during extreme events, focusing on the context of the February 6 earthquake.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Politik rekabet · politik kutuplaşma · politik rant

Abstract

The healthy functioning of democracy relies on the healthy functioning of political competition. In Türkiye, one of the most significant challenges faced by democracy is that political competition has deviated from its normal democratic boundaries. Due to the increase in political polarization, political competition has become harsh and confrontational. This confrontational and harsh characteristic also manifested itself in the political debates in the aftermath of the devastating earthquake in February 2023. On February 6, 2023, Türkiye was shaken by a dramatic earthquake that struck several large settlements. Naturally, an event that caused such widespread damage and suffering swiftly became a prominent topic on the political agenda. The objective of this article is to analyze the post-earthquake attitudes of political actors, certain social media developments, and the ongoing election process, through their interrelationships and the fine line between political competition and political polarization. The main motivation of the study is to uncover the appearance and consequences of political polarization during extreme events, focusing on the context of the February 6 earthquake.

Özet

Demokrasinin sağlıklı işleyişi politik rekabetin de sağlıklı bir zeminde işlemesine bağlıdır. Türkiye’de demokrasinin karşı karşıya kaldığı en önemli sorunlardan birisi politik rekabetin demokrasinin olağan sınırları içerisinde gerçekleşmiyor olmasıdır. Politik kutuplaşmanın artışına bağlı olarak politik rekabet de sert ve çatışmacı bir nitelik göstermektedir. Bu çatışmacı ve sert nitelik kendisini Şubat 2023’de gerçekleşen ve çok büyük bir yıkıma neden olan depremin sonrasındaki politik tartışmalarda da göstermiştir. Türkiye, 6 Şubat 2023 tarihinde birden fazla büyük yerleşim yerini vuran dramatik bir depremle sarsıldı. Doğal olarak bu kadar geniş ölçekli bir hasara ve acıya neden olan bir olay politik gündemin de en can alıcı konusu haline geldi. Bu makale, deprem sonrası politik aktörlerin tutumlarını, sosyal medyadaki bazı gelişmeleri ve çoktandır girilmiş olan seçim sürecini birbirleri ile ilişkileri; politik rekabet ile politik kutuplaşma arasındaki ince çizgi üzerinden analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmanın temel motivasyonu, extrem olaylar sırasındaki politik kutuplaşmanın görünümü ve sonuçlarını 6 Şubat depremi bağlamında ortaya koymaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ertugay, F. (2025). Political Projections of the February 6 Earthquake in Türkiye in the Context of Political Competition and Political Polarization. Gazi Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 37, 361–386. https://doi.org/10.19060/gav.1838136

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. AKBOĞA, Sema, and Osman Şahin, “Satisfaction with Democracy in Turkey: Findings from a National Survey”, Politics, 2021, Vol: 41, No: 2, pp. 207–223.
  2. ANTHONY, Kathryn E. and SELLNOW, Timothy L., “Information Acquisition, Perception, Preference, and Convergence by Gulf Coast Residents in the Aftermath of the Hurricane Katrina Crisis”, Argumentation and Advocacy, 2011, Vol: 48, pp. 81–96.
  3. ARBATLİ, Ekim and ROSENBERG, Dina, “United We Stand, Divided We Rule: How Political Polarization Erodes Democracy”, Democratization, 2021, Vol: 28, No: 2, pp. 285-307, Doi:10.1080/13510347.2020.1818068.
  4. AYDIN, Ali Fikret, “Sosyal Medyada Dezenformasyon ve Manipülasyon: 2023 Kahramanmaraş Depremi Örneği”, İnsan Ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2023, Vol: 12, No: 5, pp. 2603-2624. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.1283358.
  5. AYDIN-DÜZGİT, Senem, and Evren Balta, “When Elites Polarize Over Polarization: Framing the Polarization Debate in Turkey”, New Perspectives on Turkey, 2019, Vol: 60, pp. 153–76.
  6. BARALDI, Anna Laura, “Political Competition: Definitions, Sources and Economic Effects”, Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, 2015, pp. 1–7.
  7. BARDHAN, Pranab, and Tsung-Tao Yang, “Political Competition in Economic Perspective”, UC Berkeley: Department of Economics, Retrieved from Https://Escholarship.Org/Uc/Item/1907c39n, 2004, pp. 1–36.
  8. BARTOLINI, Stefano. 1999. “Collusion, Competition and Democracy: Part I.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 11 (4): 435–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692899011004001.