Journals / Fe Dergi / 2025 / Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2

Looking Beyond the Glass Ceiling: Gender Economics in China from a Social Perspective

Sercan Yavan(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-9873-5931
Journal
Fe Dergi
Pages
221–229
Publication Date
2025-12-17
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results suggest that the glass ceiling is fueled by social identities, cultural norms, and the gender-based dynamics of guanxi, or in other words, relationship networks, in addition to institutional barriers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This book review analyzes The Economics of Gender in China: Women, Work, and the Glass Ceiling by Sisi Sung and assesses the substantive contributions the book offers to the study of gender economics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to adapt Akerlof and Kranton's identity economics model to the Chinese setting, the study first critically assesses the explanatory power of discrimination models, the theory of psychological attributes, and human capital theory by adding the idea of ‘cultural stereotype in the broadest sense’ Between 2019 and 2021, forty-five managers from the public and commercial sectors participated in in-depth interviews that served as the study's foundation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results suggest that the glass ceiling is fueled by social identities, cultural norms, and the gender-based dynamics of guanxi, or in other words, relationship networks, in addition to institutional barriers.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Çin · Kültürel stereotip · Cinsiyet eşitliği

Abstract

This book review analyzes The Economics of Gender in China: Women, Work, and the Glass Ceiling by Sisi Sung and assesses the substantive contributions the book offers to the study of gender economics. Given China's enormous economic growth and gender equality in education over the past four decades, Sung questions why there are still few women in executive positions. In order to adapt Akerlof and Kranton's identity economics model to the Chinese setting, the study first critically assesses the explanatory power of discrimination models, the theory of psychological attributes, and human capital theory by adding the idea of ‘cultural stereotype in the broadest sense’ Between 2019 and 2021, forty-five managers from the public and commercial sectors participated in in-depth interviews that served as the study's foundation. The results suggest that the glass ceiling is fueled by social identities, cultural norms, and the gender-based dynamics of guanxi, or in other words, relationship networks, in addition to institutional barriers. The chances and hurdles that women encounter during promotion processes are greatly influenced by the disparities in organizational structures between the public and private sectors. The study critically examines the book's drawbacks, including the lack of sample variety, the absence of a comparative perspective, and the feasibility of policy suggestions, even as it emphasizes the work's robust theoretical framework and unique contributions based on field data. As a result, Sung's book has been considered as a significant reference which points out the necessity of addressing cultural transformation in addition to legal and economic reforms for gender equality regulations.

Özet

Bu kitap incelemesi, Sisi Sung’un The Economics of Gender in China: Women, Work and the Glass Ceiling adlı çalışmasını ele almakta ve eserin toplumsal cinsiyetin ekonomik analizine getirdiği özgün katkıları değerlendirmektedir. Sung, Çin’de son kırk yılda yaşanan hızlı ekonomik büyüme ve eğitimde sağlanan cinsiyet eşitliğine rağmen, kadınların üst yönetim pozisyonlarındaki temsilinin neden sınırlı kaldığını sorgular. Çalışma, beşeri sermaye teorisi, psikolojik özellikler kuramı ve ayrımcılık modellerinin açıklama gücünü eleştirel biçimde değerlendirir; ardından Akerlof ve Kranton’un kimlik ekonomisi modelini, “kültürel stereotip” kavramıyla genişleterek Çin bağlamına uyarlar. Araştırmanın temelini, 2019–2021 yılları arasında devlet ve özel sektörden kırk beş yöneticiyle yapılan derinlemesine mülakatlar oluşturur. Bulgular, cam tavanın yalnızca kurumsal engellerden değil, aynı zamanda kültürel normlar, sosyal kimlikler ve guanxi olarak bilinen ilişki ağlarının toplumsal cinsiyet temelli dinamiklerinden beslendiğini gösterir. Devlet ve özel sektörün farklı örgütsel yapıları, kadınların terfi süreçlerindeki fırsat ve engelleri belirgin biçimde şekillendirir. İncelemede, eserin güçlü teorik çerçevesi ve saha verilerine dayalı özgün katkıları vurgulanmakla birlikte, örneklem çeşitliliğinin sınırlılığı, karşılaştırmalı perspektif eksikliği ve politika önerilerinin uygulanabilirliği konularındaki eksikler eleştirel biçimde tartışılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, Sung’un çalışması, toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliği politikalarında kültürel dönüşümün, hukuki ve ekonomik reformlarla birlikte ele alınmasının gerekliliğini ortaya koyan önemli bir referans eser olarak değerlendirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yavan, S. (2025). Looking Beyond the Glass Ceiling: Gender Economics in China from a Social Perspective. Fe Dergi, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 2, 221–229. https://doi.org/10.46655/federgi.1768194

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Acker, J. 1992. From Sex Roles to Gendered Institutions. Contemporary Sociology, 21(5), 565–569. https://doi.org/10.2307/2075528.
  2. Akerlof, George A., and Rachel E. Kranton. 2000. “Economics and Identity.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (3): 715–53. https://doi. org/10.1162/003355300554881.
  3. Becker, Gary S. 1957. The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  4. Eagly, Alice H., Mary C. Johannesen-Schmidt, and Marloes L. van Engen. 2003. “Transformational, Transactional, and Laissez-Faire Leadership Styles: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Women and Men.” Psychological Bulletin 129 (4): 569–91. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569.
  5. Schultz, Theodore W. 1961. “Investment in Human Capital.” The American Economic Review 51 (1): 1–17.