SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

Do TV Content Rating Systems Necessary for Protecting Adolescents? Adolescents’ Perceptions and Parents’ Attitudes Towards Smart Signs

Çağla Pınar Bozoklu
Pages
31–54
Publication Date
2018-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that adolescents whose mothers with a better education level found the sign more unnecessary, whereas adolescents whose mothers with lower education level perceive them mostly cognizable, attention-grabbing, effective on program decision, useful and consistent with the program content.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Abstract In addition to TV content rating system applications, The Guide of American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends to parents monitoring their children while watching TV.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to that, a developed questionnaire was conducted to 384 students who are attending 6th, 7th and 8th grades (11-16 ages) of the public schools in the capital city of Turkey by using stratified sampling method.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate that adolescents whose mothers with a better education level found the sign more unnecessary, whereas adolescents whose mothers with lower education level perceive them mostly cognizable, attention-grabbing, effective on program decision, useful and consistent with the program content.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Adölesan · Bilişsel işleme · Gelişim

Abstract

Abstract In addition to TV content rating system applications, The Guide of American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommends to parents monitoring their children while watching TV. The aim of this research is to analyze the attitudes of adolescents towards Smart Signs (Turkish TV content rating system) depending on their perceptions and their parents’ attitudes. According to that, a developed questionnaire was conducted to 384 students who are attending 6th, 7th and 8th grades (11-16 ages) of the public schools in the capital city of Turkey by using stratified sampling method. The results indicate that adolescents whose mothers with a better education level found the sign more unnecessary, whereas adolescents whose mothers with lower education level perceive them mostly cognizable, attention-grabbing, effective on program decision, useful and consistent with the program content. Moreover, there is no influential role of fathers’ education level on adolescents’ perception on Smart Signs.

Özet

Amerikan Pediatri Akademisi (AAP) Rehberi, TV içerik dereceleme sistemlerine ek olarak ebeveynlere, çocukları TV izlerken onları denetlemesini önermektedir. Bu araştırmanın amacı, Ankara’da yaşayan adölesanların Akıllı İşaretlere yönelik tutumlarını, ailelerinin tutumlarına ve kendi algılamalarına göre analiz etmektir. Buna göre, araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen anket, tabakalı örnekleme yöntemi baz alınarak, Ankara’daki devlet okullarında okuyan 384 öğrenciye uygulanmıştır. Sonuçlara göre, daha iyi eğitime sahip annesi olan çocuklar işaretleri gereksiz görürken; daha düşük seviyede eğitimi olan annelerin çocukları işaretleri çoğunlukla kolay anlaşılır, dikkat çekici, program seçiminde etkili, faydalı ve program içeriği ile ilişkili algılamaktadır. Ayrıca, babaların eğitim seviyesinin adölesanların Akıllı İşaretleri algılaması üzerinde hiç etkisi yoktur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bozoklu, Ç. P. (2018). Do TV Content Rating Systems Necessary for Protecting Adolescents? Adolescents’ Perceptions and Parents’ Attitudes Towards Smart Signs. Çankırı Karatekin Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 31–54. https://doi.org/10.18074/ckuiibfd.348355

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Communications (2001). Children, Adolescents and Television. Pediatrics, 107(2), 423-426.
  2. Aral, N. & Aktaş, Y. (1997). Çocukların Televizyon ve Diğer Etkinliklere Harcadıkları Sürenin Incelenmesi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(13).
  3. Aubrey, J. S., Harrison, K., Kramer, L., & Yellin, J. (2003). Variety Versus Timing Gender Differences in College Student's Sexual Expectations as Predicted by Exposure to Sexually Oriented Television. Communication Research, 30(4), 432-460.
  4. Batmaz, V. & Aksoy, A. (1995). Türkiye’de Televizyon ve Aile. Ankara: Aile Araştırma Kurumu.
  5. Brown, J.D., L'Engle, K.L., Pardun, C.J., Guo, G., Kenneavy, K., & Jackson, C. (2006). Sexy Media Matter: Exposure to Sexual Content in Music, Movies, Television, and Magazines Predicts Black and White Adolescents' Sexual Behavior. Pediatrics, 117(4), 1018-27.
  6. Buerkel-Rothfuss, N., & Strouse, J. (1993). Media Exposure and Perceptions of Sexual Behaviors: The Cultivation Hypothesis Moves to the Bedroom. In B. Greenberg, J. Brown and N. Buerkel-Rothfuss (Eds.), Media, Sex and The Adolescent. Cresskill: Hampton.
  7. Byrnes, J.P. (2005). Self-regulated Decision-Making in Children and Adolescents. In: J.E. Jacobs and P.A. Klaczynski (Eds.), The Development of Judgment and Decision-Making in Children and Adolescents. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 5–38.
  8. Cheng, T.L., Brenner, R.A., Wright, J.L., Sachs, H.C., Moyer, P. & Rao, M.R. (2004). Children's Violent Television Viewing: Are Parents Monitoring?. Pediatrics, 114(1), 94-99.
  9. Eagly, A.H. & Chaiken, S. (2007). The Advantages of an Inclusive Definition of Attitude. Social Cognition, 25(5), 582-602.
  10. Egan, J. (2007). Marketing Communications. Cengage Learning EMEA.
  11. Gesell, A., Ilg, F.L. & Ames, L.B. (1956). Youth; The Years from Ten To Sixteen.
  12. Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice. Harvard University Press.
  13. Gray, W.M. (1990). Formal Operational Thought. Reasoning, Necessity, and Logic. Developmental Perspective, 227-253.
  14. Haddock, G., & Maio, G.R. (2008). Attitudes: Content, Structure and Functions.
  15. Huitt, W. & Hummel, J. (2003). Piaget's Theory of Cognitive Development. Educational Psychology Interactive, 3(2).
  16. Kafu, K. (2017). TV Content Rating Systems: A Review of the Literature, Current Trends and Areas of Future Research. International of Scientific Research Publications, 7(7): 674-682.
  17. Kohlberg, L. (1975). The Cognitive-Developmental Approach to Moral Education. The Phi Delta Kappan, 56(10), 670-677.
  18. Kunkel, D., Cope, K.M., & Biely, E. (1999). Sexual Messages on Television: Comparing Findings from Three Studies. The Journal of Sex Research, 36(3): 6.
  19. Lerner, R.M., & Steinberg, L. (2009). Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, Individual Bases of Adolescent Development (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons.
  20. Öktem, F., Sayıl, M. & Özen, S.Ç. (2006). Akıllı Işaretlere Rehberlik Eden Tüketici Araştırması. Ankara:RTÜK.
  21. Stewart, D.W., & Martin, I.M. (1994). Intended and Unintended Consequences Of Warning Messages: A Review and Synthesis of Empirical Research. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 1-19.
  22. Türkkent, E. (2012). Okul Öncesi Dönem Çocuklarının Televizyondan Etkilenmeleri Konusunda Anne ve Öğretmen Görüşleri, Master’s thesis, Burdur: T.C. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi, Türkiye.
  23. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_content_rating_systems
  24. http://www.meb.gov.tr/baglantilar/okullar/index.asp?ILADI=ANKARA&ILKODU=6, (Retrieved from 2015, May 11)