Journals / ENT Updates / 2026 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Assessment of chemosensory disorders in allergic rhinitis

Pages
82–86
Publication Date
2017-09-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Since chemosensory deprivation in AR patients has tended to be overlooked in the past, these outcomes suggest that chemosensory disorders should be part of the standard evaluation of patients with AR.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a globally common inflammatory disease that has a considerable effect on an individual's quality of life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It is estimated that AR affects 10% to 25% of the general population.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Since chemosensory deprivation in AR patients has tended to be overlooked in the past, these outcomes suggest that chemosensory disorders should be part of the standard evaluation of patients with AR.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Allergic rhinitis · chemosensory disorders · taste and smell disorders

Abstract

Objective: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a globally common inflammatory disease that has a considerable effect on an individual's quality of life. It is estimated that AR affects 10% to 25% of the general population. Both gustatory and olfactory disorders affect the social activities and job performance resulting in impaired quality of life in patients suffering from AR. We think that these problems have not been sufficiently investigated in the past. We, therefore, decided to evaluate the smell-taste disorders in patients suffering from AR. Our objective is to evaluate the chemosensory perception in patients suffering from allergic AR. Methods: Fifty-four patients with AR and 34 healthy controls were enrolled for the current study. "Sniffin' sticks" test and taste strips were used for chemosensory assessment. Results: According to the "Sniffin' sticks" test results, patients with AR had significantly lower scores for odor threshold and identification subtasks, whereas there was no difference between the two groups regarding odor discrimination scores (p<0.001, p<0.001, and p=0.3, respectively). After evaluating the taste strip test results, we found that taste scores were significantly low in patients with AR when compared to controls for sweet, salty, bitter and sour tastes. Conclusion: This study showed clinically important deficiency of chemosensory sensitivity in AR patients. Since chemosensory deprivation in AR patients has tended to be overlooked in the past, these outcomes suggest that chemosensory disorders should be part of the standard evaluation of patients with AR.

🔖

Cite This Article

Avinçsal, M. Ö., Altundağ, A., Dizdar, D., Dinç, M. E., Ulusoy, S., Külekçi, M. (2017). Assessment of chemosensory disorders in allergic rhinitis. ENT Updates, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 82–86. https://ajindex.com/articles/1205379

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bousquet J, Dahl R, Khaltaev N. Global alliance against chronic respiratory diseases. Allergy 2007;62:216–23
  2. Rydzewski B, Pruszewicz A, Sulkowski WJ. Assessment of smell and taste in patients with allergic rhinitis. Acta Otolaryngol 2000;120:323–6
  3. Bollen CM, Beikler T. Halitosis: the multidisciplinary approach. Int J Oral Sci 2012;4:55–63
  4. Guilemany JM, García-Piñero A, Alobid I, et al. The loss of smell in persistent allergic rhinitis is improved by levocetirizine due to reduction of nasal inflammation but not nasal congestion (the CIRANO study). Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2012;158: 184–90
  5. D’Alonzo GE Jr. Scope and impact of allergic rhinitis. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2002;102:S2–6
  6. Hummel T, Sekinger B, Wolf S, Pauli E, Kobal G. “Sniffin’ sticks”: olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory thresh- old. Chem Senses 1997;22:39–52
  7. Kobal G, Klimek L, Wolfensberger M, et al. Multicenter inves- tigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identi- fication, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2000;257:205–11
  8. Hummel T, Kobal G, Gudziol H, Mackay-Sim A. Normative data for the “Sniffin’ sticks” including tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds: an upgrade based on a group of more than 3,000 subjects. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2007;264:237–43
  9. Tekeli H, Altunda¤ A, Saliho¤lu M, Cayönü M, Kendirli MT. The applicability of the “Sniffin’ sticks” olfactory test in a Turkish pop- ulation. Med Sci Monit 2013;30:1221–6
  10. Mueller C, Kallert S, Renner B, et al. Quantitative assessment of gustatory function in a clinical context using impregnated ‘‘taste strips’’. Rhinology 2003;41:2–6
  11. Pawankar R, Canonica GW, Holgate ST, Lockey RF. WAO white book on allergy 2011–2012. Milwaukee, WI: WAO; 2011
  12. Cowart BJ, Flynn-Rodden K, McGeady SJ, Lowry LD. Hyposmia in allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1993;91:747–51
  13. Katotomichelakis M, Balarsouras D, Tripsianis G, Tsaroucha A, Homsioglou E, Danielides V. Normative values of olfactory function testing using the ‘sniffin’ sticks’. Laryngoscope 2007; 117:114– 20
  14. Hamada N, Endo S, Tomita H. Characteristics of 2278 patients visiting the Nihon University Hospital Taste Clinic over a 10- year period with special reference to age and sex distributions. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2002;(546):7–15.