SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Emek Araştırma Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 16 Sayı: 28

“Sorry We Missed You” Odağından Neo-feodal Emek Rejimi ve Algoritmik Kurumsallaşma Entegrasyonu

Sergen Gürsoy(Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi)0000-0002-9032-2999
Pages
257–278
Publication Date
2025-12-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Böylelikle dijital platform emek rejimlerinde egemenlik anlayışı, neo-küresel esneklik çerçevesince güncel teorik yapıya entegre edilmektedir.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Küreselleşmenin yoğun biçimde nüfuz ettiği sosyo-ekonomik yapı içerisinde işgücü piyasaları ve buna yönelik teorik yansımalar hızla gelişim sağlamaktadır.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Bu kapsamda çalışma, Ken Loach’un “Sorry, We Missed You” (2019) filmi çerçevesinden neo-feodal emek rejimini keşfetmeye odaklanmaktadır.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Böylelikle dijital platform emek rejimlerinde egemenlik anlayışı, neo-küresel esneklik çerçevesince güncel teorik yapıya entegre edilmektedir.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Platform Çalışması · Algoritmik Yönetim · Dijital Vasallık

Özet

Küreselleşmenin yoğun biçimde nüfuz ettiği sosyo-ekonomik yapı içerisinde işgücü piyasaları ve buna yönelik teorik yansımalar hızla gelişim sağlamaktadır. Bu araştırma, dijital platform ekonomilerine bağlı olarak işçi-işveren ilişkilerini, neo-feodal emek rejimleri ve algoritmik kurumsallaşma arasında kavramsal yapıyı sorgulamayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu kapsamda çalışma, Ken Loach’un “Sorry, We Missed You” (2019) filmi çerçevesinden neo-feodal emek rejimini keşfetmeye odaklanmaktadır. Filmin konusu dahilinde günümüz çevrimiçi işgücü piyasasının yansıması olarak; borca yönelik bağlılık, güvencesizlik, puanlama sistemi, şikayet temelli denetim, tek taraflı söyleşme ve anlık biçimde erişilebilirlik talepleri belirginleşmektedir. Böylelikle algoritmik yönetim anlayışı, itibar ekonomileri ve bağımlı girişimcilik kavramları kesişim noktasını oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın sonucunda ortaya çıkan temalara dayanarak dijital vasallık ve algoritmik kurum kavramlarının bütünleştiği bir çerçeve ortaya konulmaktadır. Araştırma, çevrimiçi çalışma biçimlerinin yalnızca üretim anlayışı ile değil, aynı zamanda dijital platform üzerinden egemenliğin tekinsiz yeniden kuruluşu olduğunu; ancak bu kuruluşun “feodal” benzetmeyi aşan yeni kurumsal biçimlerle (şeffaflık, veri erişimi, algoritmik hesap verebilirlik tartışmaları) iç içe geçtiğini savunmaktadır. Böylelikle dijital platform emek rejimlerinde egemenlik anlayışı, neo-küresel esneklik çerçevesince güncel teorik yapıya entegre edilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gürsoy, S. (2025). “Sorry We Missed You” Odağından Neo-feodal Emek Rejimi ve Algoritmik Kurumsallaşma Entegrasyonu. Emek Araştırma Dergisi, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 28, 257–278. https://ajindex.com/articles/1205250

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (55)

  1. Allon, G., Chen, D., & Moon, K. (2025). Measuring strategic behavior by gig economy workers: Multihoming and repositioning. Available at SSRN 4411974.
  2. Berg, J., Furrer, M., Harmon, E., Rani, U., & Silberman, M. S. (2018). Digital labour platforms and the future of work: Towards decent work in the online world. ILO.
  3. Birch, K. (2020). Technoscience rent: Toward a theory of rentiership for technoscientific capitalism. Science, technology, & human values, 45(1), 3-33.
  4. Birch, K., Chiappetta, M., & Artyushina, A. (2020). The problem of innovation in technoscientific capitalism: Data rentiership and the policy implications of turning personal digital data into a private asset. Policy studies, 41(5), 468-487.
  5. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, 9(2), 27-40.
  6. Burnell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis, elements of the sociology of corporate life.
  7. Ciotti, F., Hornuf, L., & Stenzhorn, E. (2025). Lock‐In Effects in Online Labor Markets. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12612
  8. Cohen, J. E. (2019). Between truth and power. Oxford University Press.
  9. Cutolo, D., & Kenney, M. (2021). Platform-dependent entrepreneurs: Power asymmetries, risks, and strategies in the platform economy. Academy of management perspectives, 35(4), 584-605.
  10. De Stefano, V. (2016). The rise of the” just-in time workforce”: on demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the” gig economy”. Comparative labor law and policy journal, 37(3), 461-471.
  11. Dean, J. (2024). The Neofeudalising Tendency of Communicative Capitalism. tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society, 22(1), 197-207.
  12. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  13. Dowling, E. (2022). The care crisis: What caused it and how can we end it?. Verso Books.
  14. Drahos, P., & Braithwaite, J. (2017). Information feudalism: Who owns the knowledge economy. Routledge.
  15. Dubal, V. B. (2017). The drive to Precarity: A political history of work, regulation, & labor advocacy in San 276 Emek Araştırma Dergisi (GEAD), Cilt 16, Sayı 28, Aralık 2025, 257-278.
  16. Francisco’s taxi & Uber economies. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 73-135.
  17. Durand, C. (2024). How silicon valley unleashed techno-feudalism: the making of the digital economy. Verso Books.
  18. Finlay, L. (2002). Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative research, 2(2), 209-230.
  19. Florisson, R., & Mandl, I. (2018). Platform work: Types and implications for work and employment-Literature review.
  20. Fredman, S., Du Toit, D., Bertolini, A., Valente, J., & Graham, M. (2025). Fair Work for Platform Workers: Lessons from the EU Directive and Beyond. Industrial Law Journal, dwaf018.
  21. Gadamer, H. G. (2004). Truth and Method, London. Continuum, 42.
  22. Gray, M. L., & Suri, S. (2019). Ghost work: How to stop Silicon Valley from building a new global underclass. Harper Business.
  23. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8359816/, Erişim Tarihi: 20.07.2025.
  24. ILO. (2018). Resolution concerning statistics on work relationships (ICSE-18): 20th International Conference of Labour Statisticians. Geneva: ILO.
  25. Jarrahi, M. H., Newlands, G., Lee, M. K., Wolf, C. T., Kinder, E., & Sutherland, W. (2021). Algorithmic management in a work context. Big data & society, 8(2), 20539517211020332.
  26. Jensen, J. L. (2020). Digital Feudalism. In The Medieval Internet: Power, Politics and Participation in the Digital Age (pp. 95-109). Emerald Publishing Limited.
  27. Kässi, O., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2018). Online labour index: Measuring the online gig economy for policy and research. Technological forecasting and social change, 137, 241-248.
  28. Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020). Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of management annals, 14(1), 366-410.
  29. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications.
  30. Kuckartz, U., & Rädiker, S. (2019). Analyzing qualitative data with MAXQDA (pp. 1-290). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  31. Lehdonvirta, V. (2024). Cloud empires: How digital platforms are overtaking the state and how we can regain control. Mit Press.
  32. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newberry Park.
  33. Mateescu, A., & Nguyen, A. (2019). Algorithmic management in the workplace. Data & Society, 8, 1030332.
  34. Micic, L., Khamooshi, H., Raković, L., & Matković, P. (2022). Defining the digital workplace: A systematic literature review. Strategic Management-International Journal of Strategic Management and Decision Support Systems in Strategic Management, 27(2).
  35. Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M. and Saldana, J. (2014) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage, London.
  36. Nancarrow, S. (2025). From Bureaucratic Closure to Algorithmic Governance: AI and the Neo-Weberian Crisis of the Professions. Available at SSRN 5171419.
  37. Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press.
  38. Ravenelle, A. J. (2019). Hustle and gig: Struggling and surviving in the sharing economy. University of California Press.
  39. Rosenblat, A. (2018). Uberland: How algorithms are rewriting the rules of work. Univ of California Press.
  40. Rosenblat, A., & Stark, L. (2016). Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber’s drivers. International journal of communication, 10, 27.
  41. Schor, J. B., Attwood-Charles, W., Cansoy, M., Ladegaard, I., & Wengronowitz, R. (2020). Dependence and precarity in the platform economy. Theory and society, 49(5), 833-861.
  42. Schutz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Northwestern University Press.
  43. Shestakofsky, B. (2017). Working algorithms: Software automation and the future of work. Work and occupations, 44(4), 376-423.
  44. Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform Capitalism. Polity Press, Cambridge Malden, MA.
  45. Thelen, K. (2018). Regulating Uber: The politics of the platform economy in Europe and the United States. Perspectives on politics, 16(4), 938-953.
  46. Vallas, S., & Schor, J. B. (2020). What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annual review of sociology, 46(1), 273-294.
  47. Van Doorn, N. (2017). Platform labor: on the gendered and racialized exploitation of low-income service work in the ‘on-demand’economy. Information, communication & society, 20(6), 898-914.
  48. Varoufakis Y (2024b) ‘Welcome to the Age of Technofeudalism’. Wired Magazine. Available at: https:// www.yanisvaroufakis.eu/2024/04/22/welcome-to-the-age-of-technofeudalism-interviewed-by-wiredmagazine/
  49. Varoufakis, Y. (2024a). Technofeudalism: What killed capitalism. Melville House.
  50. Veen, A., Barratt, T., & Goods, C. (2020). Platform-capital’s ‘app-etite’for control: A labour process analysis of food-delivery work in Australia. Work, employment and society, 34(3), 388-406.
  51. Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019). Good gig, bad gig: autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, employment and society, 33(1), 56-75.
  52. Xianghan, Z., & Zhengwei, L. (2025). Research on the Impact of Algorithmic Management on Employee Work Behavior in Platform Enterprises. Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 8(2), p99-p99.
  53. Zuboff, S. (2023). The age of surveillance capitalism. In Social theory re-wired (pp. 203-213). Routledge.
  54. Dubal, V. B. (2017). The drive to Precarity: A political history of work, regulation, & labor advocacy in San 276 Emek Araştırma Dergisi (GEAD), Cilt 16, Sayı 28, Aralık 2025, 257-278.
  55. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt8359816/, Erişim Tarihi: 20.07.2025.