Journals / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Multiple Dualities: Seeking the Patterns in Iran’s Foreign Policy

Pages
37–54
Publication Date
2019-01-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These systemic variables are filtered through nationalism, theological and revolutionary ideology and policy making mechanisms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:As one of the most significant actors of the region, Iran’s interactions with great powers (as well as regional powers and non-state actors) have come under scrutiny.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article adopts an historical account and suggests a framework to study Iran’s foreign policy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These systemic variables are filtered through nationalism, theological and revolutionary ideology and policy making mechanisms.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Iran · foreign policy · neoclassical realism

Abstract

As one of the most significant actors of the region, Iran’s interactions with great powers (as well as regional powers and non-state actors) have come under scrutiny. This article adopts an historical account and suggests a framework to study Iran’s foreign policy. The framework is contextually built with a multi-level approach to specify the independent and intervening variables of Iran’s foreign policy through the light of neoclassical realist theory. In this context, it is argued that the independent variables of Iran’s foreign policy are geopolitics, threat perceptions and balance of power politics. These systemic variables are filtered through nationalism, theological and revolutionary ideology and policy making mechanisms.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYAR, T. (2019). Multiple Dualities: Seeking the Patterns in Iran’s Foreign Policy. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 37–54. https://ajindex.com/articles/119802

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Abrahamian, Ervand. “Ali Shariati: Ideologue of the Iranian revolution.” Merip Reports 102 (1982): 24-8. ———. A History of Modern Iran. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
  2. Akbarzadeh, Shahram, and James Barry. “State Identity in Iranian Foreign Policy.” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 43, no. 4 (2016): 613-29.
  3. Arjomand, Said Amir. After Khomeini: Iran under His Successors. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
  4. Arshad, Lubna. “Internal Dynamics of Iran's Foreign Policy.” Pakistan Horizon 57, no. 1 (2004): 47-53.
  5. Barzegar, Kayhan. “Iran and the Shiite Crescent: Myths and Realities.” Journal of World Affairs 87 (2008): 87-99. ———. “Iran's Foreign Policy Strategy after Saddam.” The Washington Quarterly 33, no. 1 (2010): 173-89. ———. “Regionalism in Iran's Foreign Policy.” Iran Review, February 7, 2010. http://www.iranreview.org/content/Documents/Regionalism_in_Iran_s_Foreign_Policy.htm.
  6. Boekle, Henning, Volker Rittberger, and Wolfgang Wagner. “Constructivist Foreign Policy Theory.” In German Foreign Policy since Unification. Theories and Case Studies, edited by Volker Rittberger (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2001): 105-37.
  7. Byman, Daniel, Shahram Chubin, Anoushiravan Ehteshami, and Jerrold D. Green. Iran's Security Policy in the Post-Revolutionary Era. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 2001. https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1320.html.
  8. Dahl, Robert A. “The Concept of Power.” Systems Research and Behavioral Science 2, no. 3 (1957): 201-15.
  9. Ehteshami, Anoushiravan. “The Foreign Policy of Iran.” In The Foreign Policies of Middle East States, edited by R. Hinnebusch and A. Ehteshami, 283-309.
  10. Boulder, Co.: Lynne Rienner, 2002. ———, and Raymond A. Hinnebusch. Syria and Iran: Middle powers in a penetrated regional system. New York: Routledge, 2002.
  11. Farhi, Farideh, and Saideh Lotfian. “Iran’s Post-Revolution Foreign Policy Puzzle.” Worldviews of Aspiring Powers: Domestic Foreign Policy Debates in China, India, Iran, Japan and Russia (2012): 115-46.
  12. Goldman, Kjell. Change and Stability in Foreign Policy: The Problems and Possibilities of Détente. Baltimore, MD: Project MUSE, 2015.
  13. Holsti, K. J. “The Concept of Power in the Study of International Relations.” Background 7, no. 4 (1964): 179-94.
  14. Hunter, Shireen T. “Iran and the Spread of Revolutionary Islam.” Third World Quarterly 10, no. 2 (1988): 730-749.
  15. Kamrava, Mehran. “Iran and Its Persian Gulf Neighbors,” in Iranian Foreign Policy since 2001: Alone in the World, edited b