SavedAdd your journal

Journals / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2018 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Reshaping International Relations: Theoretical Innovations from Africa

Karen SMİTH
Pages
81–92
Publication Date
2018-06-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article is based on the assumption that theoretical contributions from the

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article is based on the assumption that theoretical contributions from the
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article is based on the assumption that theoretical contributions from the
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article is based on the assumption that theoretical contributions from the
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:South Africa · middle power · emerging states

Abstract

This article is based on the assumption that theoretical contributions from the

🔖

Cite This Article

SMİTH, K. (2018). Reshaping International Relations: Theoretical Innovations from Africa. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 81–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/119801

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Acharya, Amitav, and Barry Buzan. “Why is there no non-Western IR theory? An Introduction.” International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7, no. 3 (2007): 287-312.
  2. Aron, Raymond. "What Is a Theory of International Relations?" Journal of International Affairs 21, no. 2 (1967): 185-206.
  3. Aydinli, Ersel, and Julie Matthews. “Are the Core and Periphery Irreconcilable? The Curious World of Publishing in Contemporary International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 1 (2000): 289-303.
  4. Ayoob, Mohamed. “Subaltern Realism: International Relations Theory Meets the Third World.” In International Relations Theory and the Third World, edited by Stephanie G. Neuman, 31-54. Houndsmills: Macmillan, 1998.
  5. Bajpai, Kanti. “Obstacles to Good Work in Indian International Relations.” International Studies 46, no. 1-2 (2009): 109-28.
  6. Bilgin, Pinar. “Thinking Past ‘Western’ IR?” Third World Quarterly 29, no. 1 (2008): 5-23. doi:10.1080/01436590701726392. Bleiker, Roland. “Searching for Difference in a Homogeneous Discipline.” International Studies Review 8 (2006):
  7. Brown, William. “Africa in International Relations: A Comment on IR Theory, Anarchy and Statehood.” Review of International Studies 32 (2006):
  8. Clapham, Christopher. Africa and the International System: The Politics of State Survival. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  9. Cooper, Andrew, ed. Niche Diplomacy: Middle Powers after the Cold War. Houndsmills: Macmillan, 1997.
  10. Cunningham-Cross, Linsay. “The Innovation Imperative: Chinese International Relations Research and the Search for a ‘Chinese School’.” Unpublished paper, n.d. Dunn, Kevin, C. and Timothy M. Shaw, eds. Africa’s Challenge to International Relations Theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001.
  11. Gaylard, Rob. “Welcome to the World of Our Humanity”: (African) Humanism, ubuntu and Black South African Writing.” Journal of Literary Studies 20, no. 3-4 (2004): 268-82.
  12. Geldenhuys, Deon. Deviant Conduct in World Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004. ———. The Diplomacy of Isolation: South African Foreign Policy Making. Johannesburg: Macmillan South Africa, 1984. ———. Isolated States: A Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
  13. Gill, Stephen. “Transformation and Innovation in the Study of World Order.” In Innovation and Transformation in International Studies, edited by Stephen Gill and James H. Mittelman, 5-24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
  14. Jordaan, Eduard. “The Concept of a Middle Power in International Relati