This article examines these logistical and methodological obstacles to conducting archival research for historiographical studies.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The study of international history largely depends on an exploitation of hitherto unexplored data.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sources of these data could vary from national archives to private papers to semi-structured interviews and so on.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article examines these logistical and methodological obstacles to conducting archival research for historiographical studies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Historiography · secrecy · diplomacy
Abstract
The study of international history largely depends on an exploitation of hitherto unexplored data. The sources of these data could vary from national archives to private papers to semi-structured interviews and so on. An examination of the historiography of Turkish Foreign Policy requires the employing of a rigorous methodology to unearth novel data to feed into current academic debates. Students of international history should be advised of possible logistic and methodological flaws and obstacles in the process. This article examines these logistical and methodological obstacles to conducting archival research for historiographical studies.
BEZCİ, E. (2019). Secrecy and the Study of International History: Missing Dimension in Turkish Foreign Policy. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 327–338. https://ajindex.com/articles/119756
Aldrich, Richard J. GCHQ: The Uncensored Story of Britain's Most Secret Intelligence Agency. London: Harper Press, 2010. ———. “‘Grow Your Own’: Cold War Intelligence and History Supermarkets.” Intelligence and National Security 17, no. 1 (2002): 135–52. ———. The Hidden Hand: Britain, America and the Cold War Secret Intelligence. London: Overlook, 2001.
Aldrich, Richard J., and Rory Cormac. The Black Door: Spies, Secret Intelligence, and British Prime Ministers. London: William Collins, 2016.
Alvarez, David. Bureaucracy and Cold War Diplomacy: The United States and Turkey 1943–1946. Thessaloniki: Institute of Balkan Studies, 1980.
Andrew, Christopher M. Secret Service: The Making of the British Intelligence Community. London: Heinemann, 1985.
Athanassopoulou, Ekavi. Turkey-Anglo-American Security Interests, 1945–1952: The First Enlargement of NATO. London: Routledge, 1999.
Benjamin, Walter. On the Concept of History. Createspace Independent, 2009.
Berridge, Geoffrey. British Diplomacy in Turkey, 1583 to the Present: A Study in the Evolution of the Resident Embassy. Leiden: Brill, 2009. ———. Diplomacy: Theory and Practice. Bansington: Routledge, 2010.
Bezci, Egemen. Turkish Intelligence and the Cold War: Espionage, Security and International Relations. London: IB Tauris, 2018.
Bezci, Egemen B., and Güven Gürkan Öztan. “Anatomy of the Turkish Emergency State: A Continuous Reflection of Turkish Raison d’état between 1980 and 2002.” Middle East Critique 25, no. 2 (2016): 163–79.
Calis, Saban. Turkey's Cold War: Foreign Policy and Western Alignment in the Modern Republic. London: IB Tauris, 2017.
Cormac, Rory. Confronting the Colonies: British Intelligence and Counterinsurgency. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.
Davies, Philip, and Kristian C. Gustafson, eds. Intelligence Elsewhere: Spies and Espionage outside the Anglosphere. Washington: Georgetown University Press, 2013.
Davies, Philip. “Spies as Informants: Triangulation and the Interpretation of Elite Interview Data in the Study of the Intelligence and Security Services.” Politics 21, no. 1 (2001): 73–80.
Elman, Colin, and Miriam Fendius Elman. “Diplomatic History and International Relations Theory: Respecting Difference and Crossing Boundaries.” International Security 22.1 (1997): 5–21.
Elman, Colin, and Miriam Fendius Elman. “The role of history in international relations.” Millennium 37, no. 2 (2008): 357–64.
Gingeras, Ryan. Heroin, Organized Crime, and the Making of Modern Turkey. Oxford: Oxford Uni