Journals / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

System Dynamics Modeling in International Relations

Pages
231–253
Publication Date
2019-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, the article provides several applications from international relations via developing models of arms races and spread of intrastate conflicts.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article provides an introduction to system dynamics modeling with a particular focus on the use of system dynamics models in political science and international relations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A system dynamics approach offers an alternative to traditional qualitative and quantitative methods by providing a dynamic and endogenous point of view, which allows for understanding the dynamic interactions between variables and making short- and long-term projections for alternative policy choices.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, the article provides several applications from international relations via developing models of arms races and spread of intrastate conflicts.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Quantitative methods · modeling · arms races

Abstract

This article provides an introduction to system dynamics modeling with a particular focus on the use of system dynamics models in political science and international relations. A system dynamics approach offers an alternative to traditional qualitative and quantitative methods by providing a dynamic and endogenous point of view, which allows for understanding the dynamic interactions between variables and making short- and long-term projections for alternative policy choices. This approach is particularly useful to tackle the complex problems of contemporary politics, in which the solutions require combining the insights from different disciplines. Applications of a system dynamics approach in the social sciences cover a broad spectrum, from war initiation and termination to social inequality, from demographics to human development and democratization. This article starts by presenting the brief history of system dynamics models and their use in social sciences, and comparing a system dynamics approach to traditional qualitative and quantitative research methods by discussing the advantages and disadvantages of each one. This discussion is followed by the explanation of the essential components of system dynamics models. Finally, the article provides several applications from international relations via developing models of arms races and spread of intrastate conflicts.

🔖

Cite This Article

FİSUNOĞLU, A. (2019). System Dynamics Modeling in International Relations. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 231–253. https://ajindex.com/articles/119739

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abdollahian, Mark A., et al. “A Formal Model of Stabilization and Reconstruction Operations.” Military Operations Research 14, no. 3 (2009): 5–30. ———. “Dynamics of Cultural Change: The Human Development Perspective.” International Studies Quarterly 56, no. 4 (2012): 827–42.
  2. Akgul, Oner. “A Bibliographical Study on the Academic Research of Peace and Conflict in Turkey.” Paper presented at the 7th Eurasian Peace Science Meeting, İstanbul, 2018.
  3. Aydin, Mustafa, Fulya Hisaroglu and Korhan Yazgan. “Türkiye'de Uluslararası İlişkiler Akademisyenleri ve Alana Yönelik Yaklaşımları Üzerine Bir İnceleme: TRIP 2014 Sonuçları.” Uluslararasi Iliskiler 12, no. 48 (2016): 3–35.
  4. Banks, Catherine M., and John A. Sokolowski. “From War on Drugs to War against Terrorism: Modeling the Evolution of Colombia’s Counter-Insurgency.” Social Science Research 38, no. 1 (2009): 146–54.
  5. Bernanke, Ben S., and Frederic S. Mishkin. “Inflation Targeting: A New Framework for Monetary Policy?” Journal of Economic Perspectives 11, no. 2 (1997): 97–116.
  6. Blank, Larry, et al. “A Dynamic Model of Insurgency: The Case of the War in Iraq.” Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy 14, no. 2 (2008): 1–26.
  7. Brown, Courtney. Ballots of Tumult: A Portrait of Volatility in American Voting. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1991. ———. Differential Equations: A Modeling Approach. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2007. ———. Serpents in the Sand: Essays on the Nonlinear Nature of Politics and Human Destiny. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 1995.
  8. Chamberlain, Todd. “Systems Dynamics Model of Al-Qa'ida and United States ‘Competition’.” Journal of Homeland Security and Emergency Management 4, no. 3 (2007): 1–23.
  9. Chen, Yu-Che, and Michael J. Ahn. Routledge Handbook on Information Technology in Government. New York: Routledge, 2017.
  10. Coleman, James S. Introduction to Mathematical Sociology. New York: Free Press, 1964.
  11. Demir, Cenker Korhan, and Engin Avci. “Turkish Terrorism Studies: A Preliminary Assessment.” All Azimuth 7, no. 1 (2018): 21–44.
  12. Faria, Joao Ricardo, and Daniel G.M. Arce. “Terror Support and Recruitment.” Defence and Peace Economics 16, no. 4 (2005): 263–73.
  13. Fisunoglu, Ali. “Beyond the Phoenix Factor: Consequences of Major Wars and Determinants of Postwar Recovery.” PhD Diss., Claremont Graduate University, 2014.
  14. Forrester, Jay W. Industrial Dynamics. Cambridge: The M.I.T. Press, 1961. ———. “Industrial Dynamics: A Major Breakthrough for Decision Makers.” Harvard Business Review 36,