Journals / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2016 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Intelligence Cooperation in the European Union: An Impossible Dream?

Pages
57–67
Publication Date
2016-01-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article analyzes the current EU intelligence network and tries to answer whether full intelligence cooperation in the EU could develop into a discrete organization in the aftermath of 2004 Madrid, 2005 London and the 7 January 2015 Charlie Hebdo attacks, or whether it is an impossible dream to have concerted action whereby states acknowledge their mutual alliances, interests, and strategies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:There has been a shift in the intelligence and security strategies of the states since 9/11.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The attacks created a new security environment in which intelligence has become increasingly significant.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article analyzes the current EU intelligence network and tries to answer whether full intelligence cooperation in the EU could develop into a discrete organization in the aftermath of 2004 Madrid, 2005 London and the 7 January 2015 Charlie Hebdo attacks, or whether it is an impossible dream to have concerted action whereby states acknowledge their mutual alliances, interests, and strategies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Intelligence · European Union · intelligence organizations

Abstract

There has been a shift in the intelligence and security strategies of the states since 9/11. The attacks created a new security environment in which intelligence has become increasingly significant. Not only have the responsibilities and tasks of intelligence agencies become more important, but the necessity for intelligence and security service cooperation among nations has also increased. Accordingly, intelligence agencies had to update their strategies to put more emphasis on collaboration. This article analyzes the current EU intelligence network and tries to answer whether full intelligence cooperation in the EU could develop into a discrete organization in the aftermath of 2004 Madrid, 2005 London and the 7 January 2015 Charlie Hebdo attacks, or whether it is an impossible dream to have concerted action whereby states acknowledge their mutual alliances, interests, and strategies.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bilgi, Ş. (2016). Intelligence Cooperation in the European Union: An Impossible Dream?. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 57–67. https://ajindex.com/articles/119731

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. van Buuren, Jelle. Secret Truth. The EU Joint Situation Centre. Amsterdam: Eurowatch, 2009.
  2. Clerix, Kristof. “Ilkka Salmi, the EU’s Spymaster.” Mondiaal Nieuws. Accessed May 24, 2014. http://www.mo.be/ node/3789. Cross, Davis Mai’a K. “EU Intelligence Sharing and Joint Situation Centre: A Glass Half-Full.” Paper prepared for delivery at the Meeting of the European Studies Association, 2011. Accessed May 24, 2014. http://www.euce. org/eusa/2011/papers/3a_cross.pdf. –––. “A European Transgovernmental Intelligence Network and the Role of IntCen.” Perspectives on European Cross, “European Transgovernmental Intelligence.” Politi, “European Intelligence Necessary?” Politics and Society 14, no. 3 (2013): 388-402. European Union Law. Military Staff of the European Union. Accessed August 17, 2010, http://europa.eu/legislation_ summaries/foreign_and_security_policy/cfsp_and_esdp_implementation/r00006_en.htm. European Union External Action. “The European Union Satellite Centre.” Accessed May 25, 2014. http://www.eeas. europa.eu/csdp/structures-instruments-agencies/eu-agencies-on-csdp/eu-satellite-centre/index_en.htm. European Union Military Staff. “Providing Military Capabilities to the EU.” Accessed August 20, 2010. http://www. consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cmsUpload/EUMS-June-2010.pdf. Jones, Chris. “Analysis: Secrecy Reigns at the EU’s Intelligence Centre.” Statewatch 22, no. 4 (2013). Accessed May 24, 2014. http://www.statewatch.org/analyses/no-223-eu-intcen.pdf.
  3. Lefebvre, Stéphane. “The Difficulties and Dilemmas of International Intelligence Cooperation.”International Journal of Intelligence and Counterintelligence 16, no. 4 (2003): 527 -542. Lemieux, Frederic. “Information Technology and Criminal Intelligence: A Comparative Perspective.” In Technocrime: Technology, Crime and Social Control, edited by Stephane Leman-Langlois, 139-68. Willan Publishing: London, 2013.
  4. Müller-Wille, Björn. “The Effect of International Terrorism on EU Intelligence Co-operation.” JCMS 46, no.1 (2008): 49-73. –––. “EU Intelligence Co-operation. A Critical Analysis.” Contemporary Security Policy 23, no. 2 (2002): 61-86.
  5. Nomikos, John. “Does the European Union Need a Common Intelligence Policy?” Accessed August 18, 2010. http:// www.worldsecuritynetwork.com/showArticle3.cfm?article_id=8661. –––. “European Union Intelligence Agency: A Necessary Institution for Common Intelligence Policy?” In Contemporary Issues and Debates in EU Policy: The European Union and International Relations, edi