Journals / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2016 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

Reconciliation-oriented Leadership: Nelson Mandela and South Africa

Pages
29–46
Publication Date
2016-06-19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the final analysis, it was determined that there is a close relationship between the prospective success of the reconciliation process and a leader’s contribution to bringing about reconciliation in a society.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Heroic leaders advocating for reconciliation has become particularly significant in the process of conflict resolution.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article analyses the case of South Africa’s national reconciliation experiences and Mandela’s iconic role in this process.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the final analysis, it was determined that there is a close relationship between the prospective success of the reconciliation process and a leader’s contribution to bringing about reconciliation in a society.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Heroic leaders advocating for reconciliation has become particularly significant in the process of conflict resolution. This article analyses the case of South Africa’s national reconciliation experiences and Mandela’s iconic role in this process. It is claimed that Mandela’s reconciliation-oriented leadership, his personality, and endeavours have directly affected the promotion of intergroup reconciliation in South Africa in a positive way. The article’s analytic framework is built on Galtung’s Conflict Triangle and applied to reconciliation initiatives employed by Nelson Mandela in South Africa. The research question that this study focused on can be expressed as follows: What is the role of leaders in the process of national reconciliation? From this perspective, Mandela’s extraordinary efforts to strengthen national reconciliation in South Africa are examined by looking into his normative statements, symbolic acts, and judicial actions. The method proposed in this article contributes to the study of reconciliation at the national level, dealing with the normative statements and behaviours of those in power. In the final analysis, it was determined that there is a close relationship between the prospective success of the reconciliation process and a leader’s contribution to bringing about reconciliation in a society.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, H. K., TURHAN, Y. (2016). Reconciliation-oriented Leadership: Nelson Mandela and South Africa. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 29–46. https://ajindex.com/articles/119693

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. “The Long Walk of Nelson Mandela.” By Stengel, Richard. PBS (August 2008). Accessed February 22, 2016. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/mandela/.
  2. African National Congress. “Nelson Mandela’s Address to a rally in Cape Town on his Release from prison.” February 11, 1990. Accessed March 21, 2016. http://www.anc.org.za/show.php?id=4520.
  3. Bairstow, Timothy M., and Marine Corps. “Amnesty, Reintegration and Reconciliation.” Military Review (March-April 2009): 89-95.
  4. Beck, Roger B. The History of South Africa: The Greenwood Histories of the Modern Nations. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2000.
  5. Bloomfield, David. “On Good Term: Clarifying Reconciliation.” Berghof Report No:14,Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management, 2006. ———, etal. Reconciliation After Violent Conflict: A Handbook. Stockholm: IDEA Publications, 2003. Brounéus, Karen. “Analyzing Reconciliation: A Structured Method for Measuring National Reconciliation Initiative.” Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology 14, no. 3 (2008): 291-313.
  6. Butler, Anthony. Contemporary South Africa. New York: Palgrave Macmillan Pub, 2009.
  7. Dwyer, Susan. “Reconciliation for Realists.” In Dilemmas of Reconciliation: Cases and Concepts, edited by C.A.L. Prager and T. Govier, 307–26.
  8. Waterloo, Ont.: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2003.
  9. Evans, Martha. “Mandela and the Televised Birth of the Rainbow Nation.” National Identities 12, no. 3 (2010): 309-26.
  10. Galtung, Johan. After Violence: 3R, Reconstruction, Reconciliation, Resolution, Coping With Visible and Invisible Effects of War and Violence. NY:Transcend, 1998. ———. “Cultural Violence.” Journal of Peace Research 27, no. 3 (1990): 291-305. ———. Peace by Peaceful Means: Peace and Conflict, Development and Civilizations. London:Sage Pub., 1996 ———. Transcend and Transform: An Introduction to Conflict Work. London: Pluto Press, 2004. ———. “Violence, Peace and Peace Research.” Journal of Peace Research VI, no. 3 (1969):167-91.
  11. Govier, Trudy, and Wilhelm Verwoerd. “Trust and the Problem of National Reconciliation.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences. London: Sage Pub., 2002.
  12. Goodman, Tanya. Staging Solidarity: Truth and Reconciliation in a New South Africa, London: Paradigm Pub, 2009.
  13. Hardimon, Michael O. Hegel’s Social Philosophy: The Project of Reconciliation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
  14. Hauss, Charles. International Conflict Resolution. London: Continuum Press, 2010.
  15. Hayner, Priscilla B. “Past Truth, Present Dangers: The Ro