Journals / Çukurova Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3

Assessment of the Availability of the Multinutrient Extraction Methods for Wheat Plant for the Determining Phosphorus by Soil and Plant Analysis

Fosforun Belirlenmesinde Çoklu Ekstraksiyon Yöntemlerinin Buğday Bitkisinde Kullanılabilirliğinin Toprak ve Bitki Analizleri ile Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
229–233
Publication Date
2016-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Likewise, the relationship between routine and multinutrient extraction methods was determined by the amount of phosphorus in plant.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Phosphorus analysis and extraction of phosphorus can be considered the most important in the plant nutrients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study is conducted at 13 locations in Thrace where the soil is both acidic (3) and alkaline(10).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Likewise, the relationship between routine and multinutrient extraction methods was determined by the amount of phosphorus in plant.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:toprak fosfor analizi · çoklu ekstraksiyon · buğday

Abstract

Phosphorus analysis and extraction of phosphorus can be considered the most important in the plant nutrients. Therefore different phosphorus extraction methods has become routine for acidic and alkaline soils. Due to the studies focus on multinutrient extraction methods and transition to the use of these methods, this issue have importance at the present time. This study is conducted at 13 locations in Thrace where the soil is both acidic (3) and alkaline(10). Soil and plant samples taken from the trials are analyzed and assessed. Bray and Kurtz method was used in acidic soils and Olsen method was used in alkaline soils for the routine phosphorus analysis. Mehlich-3, ammonium bicarbonate - DTPA (ABDTPA), acid ammonium acetate-EDTA (AAAC-EDTA) and Yanai methods was used as multinutrient extraction methods for all of the soil samples. Analysis results was obtained and correlation coefficient was calculated between routine methods and multinutrient extraction methods. Likewise, the relationship between routine and multinutrient extraction methods was determined by the amount of phosphorus in plant.

Özet

Fosfor ekstraksiyonu ve analizi besin elementleri içerisinde en önemlisi sayılabilir. Bu yüzden asit topraklarda ayrı, alkalin topraklarda ayrı ekstraksiyon yöntemleri kullanılarak analizi rutin hale gelmiştir. Çoklu ekstraksiyon yöntemleri üzerine araştırma çalışmalarının yoğunlaştığı ve kullanıma geçildiği günümüzde de bu konu önem arzetmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜRBÜZ, M. A., KARDEŞ, T. A., ÇEBİ, U. (2016). Assessment of the Availability of the Multinutrient Extraction Methods for Wheat Plant for the Determining Phosphorus by Soil and Plant Analysis. Çukurova Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3, 229–233. https://ajindex.com/articles/119674

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Baker, W.H., Herron, C.G., Carroll, S.D., Henslee, M.A., Lafex, D.C., Evans, E.E., A Comparative Summary of the Standard Mehlich 3 Soil Test with a Modified Mehlich 3 Dilution Ratio Procedure, Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, Special Report 205, (2002).
  2. Bray, R.H., Kurtz, L.T., Determination of total, organic and available forms phosphorus in soils. Soil Science. 59.45-49, (1945).
  3. Elrashidi, M. A., Mays, M. D., Lee, C. W, Assessment of Mehlich-3 and ammonium bicarbonate-DTPA extraction for simultaneous measurement of fifteen elements in soil. Communication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, Vol:34 İssue:19-20, pages: 2817-2838, (2003).
  4. Gürbüz M. A., Günay, E., Makro ve Mikro Besin Elementlerinin Birlikte Ekstraksiyonunda Kullanılabilecek Metodların Trakya Yöresi Örneğinde Araştırılması. 6. Ulusal Bitki Besleme ve Gübre Kongresi, Kapadokya, Nevşehir, (2013).
  5. Kacar, B., Inal, A., Bitki Analizleri, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, No:1241, Ankara, (2008).
  6. Lakanen E, Ervio R., A comparison of eight extractants for the determination of plant available micronutrients in soils. Acta Agralica. Fenn. 123, 223-232, (1971).
  7. Mehlich, A., Mehlich-3 soil test extractant: A modification Mehlich-2 extractant. Communication Soil Science Plant Analysis. 15(12):1409-1416, (1984).
  8. Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanabe, F.S., Dean, L.A., Estimation of Available Phosphorus in Soil by Extraction with Sodium Bicarbonate. Government Printing Office: Washington D.C., U.S., USDA circular no. 939, 1–19, (1954).
  9. Richards, L.A., Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. United States Department of Agriculture Handbook, (1954). 60:94. Rodrıquez-Suarez, J.A., M. Arıas, E. Lopez, B. Soto, 2008.Comparison of Multi-Element to Single-Element Extractants for Macro-and Micronutrients in Acid Soils from Spain. Comminication in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, Vol:39 Issue:1-2, pp. 231-240.
  10. Soltanpour, P.N., Schwab, A. P., A new soil test for simultaneous extraction of macro- and micro-nutrients in alkaline soils,Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 8: 195-207, (1977).
  11. Yanai M., Uwaswa, Y., Shimizu, Y., Development of a new Multinutrient Extraction Method for Macro and Micro-Nutrients in Arable Land Soil. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 46:2, 299-313. (2000).