Journals / Çukurova Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3

Evaluation of Some of Productivity Parameters According to Parent Materials in the Semi-Arid Environment of Central Anatolia

Orta Anadolu’da Yarı Kurak İklim Şartları Altında Ana Materyale Bağlı Olarak Bazı Verimlilik Parametrelerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
61–71
Publication Date
2016-12-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study presents soil formation processes occurring on geological formations with different ages and origins and the effect of the main material on the soil's physical and chemical efficiency.According to the results, the pH-value of all soils is over 7.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study presents soil formation processes occurring on geological formations with different ages and origins and the effect of the main material on the soil's physical and chemical efficiency.According to the results, the pH-value of all soils is over 7.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All of the soil is very limely.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to this the potential chemical productivity of the volcanic soil is higher than of the main material of the other soils
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ana materyal · toprak verimliliği · Parent materials

Abstract

This study presents soil formation processes occurring on geological formations with different ages and origins and the effect of the main material on the soil's physical and chemical efficiency.According to the results, the pH-value of all soils is over 7. All of the soil is very limely. The texture ranged from clay and sandy clay. There was no salinity in the soil. The organic matter, regardless of the main material, was lower. The clay mineralogy of the soils showed similar features. In terms of prime minerals the volcanic soil has a bigger mineral diversity. According to this the potential chemical productivity of the volcanic soil is higher than of the main material of the other soils

Özet

Bu çalışma ile Konya Karapınar’da farklı yaş ve orjinli jeolojik formasyonlar üzerinde oluşan toprakların oluşum süreçleri ortaya konularak, ana materyalin toprakların, fiziksel ve kimyasal verimliliği üzerine etkisi belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARACAN, T. N., ÖZAYTEKİN, H. H., DEDEOĞLU, M. (2016). Evaluation of Some of Productivity Parameters According to Parent Materials in the Semi-Arid Environment of Central Anatolia. Çukurova Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3, 61–71. https://ajindex.com/articles/119668

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Anonim, Konya İli Arazi Varlığı. T.K.B. Köy Hizm. Gen. Md.lüğü Yay. Rapor No: 42, Ankara,(1992)
  2. Bouyoucous, G. J., Recalibration of the Hydrometer Method for Making Mechanical Analysis of Soils. Agron (1951a) 43 (434-438).
  3. Blake, G. R., Hartge, K. H., Bulk Density. in: Klute, A., (Ed.), Methods of Soil analysis, Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. Agronomy Monograph No: 9. SSSA, Madison, WI, (1986). Pp. 363-375.
  4. Blakemore, L. C., Searle, P. L. and Daly, B. K., Methods for Chemical Analysis of Soils. N.Z. Soil Bureau Scientific Report. Vol: 80. N.Z. Soil Bureau, Lower Hutt, New Zeland, (1987) Pp: 1390. Chao, T. T., Sanzolone, R.F., Decomposition Techniques. Journal of Geochemical Exploration. 1992, 106 (44-65).
  5. Erinç, S. (1984). Climatology and its methods. Marine Science, Institute of Geography, Istanbul University Press:
  6. Istanbul, Turkey (in Turkish). Gürel, A. N., Ceylanpınar Ovasında Bazalt Akıntıları Üzerinde Oluşan Toprakların Genesisleri (Doktora Tezi). Ç. Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Toprak Ana Bilim Dalı Adana, (1992).
  7. HIZALAN, E., Ünalan, H., Toprakta Önemli Kimyasal Analizler. A. Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları 278, (1966).
  8. Hocaoğlu, Ö. L., Toprakta Organik Madde, Nitrojen ve Nitrat Tayini. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Zirai Araştırma Enstitüsü Teknik Bülten No 9, (1966).
  9. Jackson, M. L., Soil Chemical Analysis. Advanced Course. Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin, Madison, Vis. 53706, (1979), Pp: 468-509.
  10. Jeeny, H., Factors of Soil Formation. McGraw-Hill, Newyork, (1941) Pp:281. Jenkins, D. A., & Jones, R. W. (1980). Trace elements in rocks, soils, plants, and animals: Introduction. Applied soil trace elements. edited by Brian E. Davies. Kapur, S., Karacadağ Yöresi Bazalt Ana Kayaları Üzerinde Yer Alan Toprakların Oluşumları ve Sınıflandırılması (Doçentlik Tezi), Çukurova Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi (S: 115) Adana, 1980.
  11. Karaman, C., Kapur, S., Öztürk, N., Smektitik Topraklarda Mikro Yapının Görüntü İşleme Teknikleri İle Sınıflandırılması. Yeryüzü ve Doğal Kaynakların İncelenmesinde Uzaktan Algılamanın Kullanımı Workshop I. Kil Bilimleri Türk Milli Komitesi. Ç. Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi Toprak Bölümü. Editörler: Cemil Cangir, Asuman Türkmenoğlu, Adana, (1995) S: 44-54.
  12. Middelburg, J. J., van der Weijden, C. H. ve Woittiez, J. R. W., 1988, Chemical processes affecting the mobility of major, minor and trace elements during weathering of granitic rocks, Chemical Geology, 68 (3), 253-273.
  13. Oyama, M., Takehra, H., Revised Standa