SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 17

EXPLORING THE WEB 2.0 TECHNOLOGIES AWARENESS, USAGE FREQUENCIES AND COMPETENCIES OF PRESERVICE TEACHERS AND INSTRUCTORS

ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARI VE ÖĞRETİM ELEMANLARININ WEB 2.0 TEKNOLOJİLERİ FARKINDALIKLARI, KULLANIM SIKLIKLARI VE YETERLİKLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Erhan Ünal0000-0002-5349-4193
Pages
553–566
Publication Date
2019-04-23
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that the majority of preservice teachers were aware of social networking sites, used them frequently and had high competency to use those technologies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to investigate the web 2.0 technologies awareness, usage frequency and competence of the preservice teachers and instructors studying in the faculty of education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 252 preservice teachers and 41 instructors from the faculty of education at a state university participated in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that the majority of preservice teachers were aware of social networking sites, used them frequently and had high competency to use those technologies.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Web 2.0 teknolojileri · öğretmen adayı · öğretim elemanı

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate the web 2.0 technologies awareness, usage frequency and competence of the preservice teachers and instructors studying in the faculty of education. The research was designed as a survey method. A total of 252 preservice teachers and 41 instructors from the faculty of education at a state university participated in the study. The data were collected through with the survey. The results showed that the majority of preservice teachers were aware of social networking sites, used them frequently and had high competency to use those technologies. It was found that the instructors were aware of the web 2.0 technologies except wiki. They used these technologies occasionally and they had high competency in terms of using social networking sites. Some implications were presented based on the results.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, eğitim fakültesinde öğrenim gören öğretmen adaylarının ve görev yapan öğretim elemanlarının web 2.0 teknolojileri farkındalığı, kullanım sıklığı ve yeterliklerini incelemektir. Araştırma tarama modeli şeklinde tasarlanmıştır. Araştırmaya bir devlet üniversitesinin eğitim fakültesinde öğrenim gören 252 öğretmen adayı ve görev yapan 41 öğretim elemanı katılmıştır. Araştırmada veriler araştırmacı tarafından hazırlanan anket ile toplanmıştır. Araştırmada çıkan sonuçlara göre, öğretmen adaylarının çoğunluğunun sosyal ağ sitelerinden haberdar oldukları, bunları sık sık kullandıkları ve bu teknolojiler kullanma yeterliklerinin yüksek olduğu bulunmuştur. Öğretim elemanlarının ise wiki hariç diğer web 2.0 teknolojilerinden haberdar oldukları, bu teknolojileri ara sıra kullandıkları ve özellikle sosyal ağ siteleri kullanma bakımından yeterli oldukları bulunmuştur. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre uygun öneriler sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ünal, E., *, E. Ü. (2019). EXPLORING THE WEB 2.0 TECHNOLOGIES AWARENESS, USAGE FREQUENCIES AND COMPETENCIES OF PRESERVICE TEACHERS AND INSTRUCTORS. Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 17, 553–566. https://doi.org/10.29029/busbed.496655

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. AHMED, A. M., ALMUNIEM, A. A., & ALMABHOUH, A. A. (2016). The current use of Web 2.0 tools in university teaching from the perspective of faculty members at the college of education. International Journal of Instruction, 9(1), 179-194.
  2. ALHASSAN, R. (2017). Exploring the Relationship between Web 2.0 tools self-efficacy and teachers' use of these tools in their teaching. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(4), 217-228.
  3. BARAN, B., & ATA, F. (2013). Üniversite öğrencilerinin web 2.0 teknolojileri kullanma durumları, beceri düzeyleri ve eğitsel olarak faydalanma durumları. Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(169), 192-208.
  4. BARO, E. E., IDIODI, E. O., & ZACCHEAUS GODFREY, V. (2013). Awareness and use of Web 2.0 tools by librarians in university libraries in Nigeria. OCLC Systems & Services: International digital library perspectives, 29(3), 170-188.
  5. BOWER, M., HEDBERG, J. G., & KUSWARA, A. (2010). A framework for Web 2.0 learning design. Educational Media International, 47(3), 177-198.
  6. CHAFFEY, D. (2018). Global social media research summary 2018. https://www.smartinsights.com/social-media-marketing/social-media-strategy/new-global-social-media-research/ adresinden 11 Aralık 2018 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
  7. CHAWINGA, W. D., & ZINN, S. (2016). Use of Web 2.0 by students in the Faculty of Information Science and Communications at Mzuzu University, Malawi. South African Journal of Information Management, 18(1), 1-12.
  8. CORMODE, G., & KRISHNAMURTHY, B. (2008). Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. First Monday, 13(6).
  9. DAVISON, D., NAGUSZEWSKI, T., PIASTA, M., SILER, B., & WARE, L. J. (2013). Nursing faculty and use of Web 2.0. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 3(8), 13-17.
  10. DIYAOLU, A. M., & RIFQAH, O. O. (2015). Investigating the educational use of Web 2. 0 among undergraduates in Nigerian Private Universities. JLIS. 6(1), 69-97
  11. DOHN, N. B. (2009). Web 2.0: Inherent tensions and evident challenges for education. International journal of computer-supported collaborative learning, 4(3), 343-363.
  12. FRANKLIN, T. AND VAN HARMELEN, M. (2007). Web 2.0 for content for learning and teaching in higher education. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/24ba/620460a6db0bd9284aabf8e286be62ddb77f.pdf adresinden 18 Nisan 2018 tarihinde erişlmiştir.
  13. IOANNOU, A., VASILIOU, C., & ZAPHIRIS, P. (2016). Problem-based learning in multimodal learning environments: Learners’ technology adoption experiences. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(7), 1022-1040.
  14. JIMOYIANNIS, A., TSIOTAKIS, P., ROUSSINOS, D., & SIORENTA, A. (2013). Preparing teachers to integrate Web 2.0 in school practice: Toward a framework for Pedagogy 2.0. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2).
  15. KAPUCU, M. S., EREN, E., & AVCI, Z. Y. (2014). Investigation of pre-service science teachers’ opinions about using goanimate to create animated videos. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 5(4), 23-40.
  16. PALAIGEORGIOU, G., & GRAMMATIKOPOULOU, A. (2016). Benefits, barriers and prerequisites for Web 2.0 learning activities in the classroom: The view of Greek pioneer teachers. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 13(1), 2-18.
  17. RICHARDSON, W. (2009). Blogs, wikis, podcasts, and other powerful web tools for classrooms (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  18. SAWANT, S. (2012). The study of the use of Web 2.0 tools in LIS education in India. Library Hi Tech News, 29(2), 11-15.
  19. SOOMRO, K. A., ZAI, S. Y., & JAFRI, I. H. (2015). Competence and usage of Web 2.0 technologies by higher education faculty. Educational Media International, 52(4), 284-295.
  20. ŞENDAG, S., EROL, O., SEZGİN, S., & DULKADİR, N. (2015). Preservice teachers' critical thinking dispositions and web 2.0 competencies. Contemporary Educational Technology, 6(3), 172-187.
  21. UZUNBOYLU, H., BİCEN, H., & ÇAVUŞ, N. (2011). The efficient virtual learning environment: A case study of web 2.0 tools and Windows live spaces. Computers & Education, 56, 720–726.
  22. VONA-KURT, E. (2017). Üniversite öğrencileri perspektifinden web 2.0 uygulamalarının yüksek öğrenime katkısının değerlendirilmesi. Journal of Current Researches on Social Sciences, 7(1), 417-434.