Journals / Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy / 2026 / Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1

The Effect of Social Paradigm to Philosophical Thought: The Case of Stoa and Kant

Toplumsal Paradigmanın Felsefî Düşünüşe Etkisi: Stoa ve Kant Örneği

Pages
87–99
Publication Date
2012-06-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The similarities between two human definitions presented in two different time period tried to be established, with Stoicism and Kant patterns, within this essay.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:With the city government in Ancient Greek giving its place to the central empire, the human should be redefined according to the new social paradigm.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Hellenistic philosophy could be considered as a product of this effort.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The similarities between two human definitions presented in two different time period tried to be established, with Stoicism and Kant patterns, within this essay.
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Etik · Stoacılık · Immanuel Kant

Abstract

With the city government in Ancient Greek giving its place to the central empire, the human should be redefined according to the new social paradigm. The Hellenistic philosophy could be considered as a product of this effort. A similar situation is ruling also for the Europe after Middle Age. The downturn of the feudality, with the rise of the bourgeoisie instead of it, makes a new human definition mandatory in such a social condition. Enlightenment philosophy could be considered also a product of this effort. The similarities between two human definitions presented in two different time period tried to be established, with Stoicism and Kant patterns, within this essay.

Özet

Antik Yunan’da, site yönetiminin yerini merkezî imparatorluğa bırakması, insanın, değişen toplumsal paradigmaya göre yeniden tanımlanmasını gerektirmiştir. Helenistik dönem felsefesi bu çabanın bir ürünü sayılır. Benzer bir durum Ortaçağ sonrası Avrupa için de geçerlidir. Feodalitenin çöküşü, yerine burjuvazinin yükselişi, bu toplumsal koşullarda yeni bir insan tanımı yapmayı zorunlu kılmıştır. Aydınlanma felsefesi de bu çabanın bir ürünü sayılır. Bu makalede, Stoacılık ve Kant örnekleri üzerinden, iki farklı dönemde ortaya konan iki insan tanımının birbirleriyle benzerlikleri tespit edilmeye çalışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Topuz, M. (2012). The Effect of Social Paradigm to Philosophical Thought: The Case of Stoa and Kant. Beytulhikme An International Journal of Philosophy, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 1, 87–99. https://ajindex.com/articles/1194361

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...