Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2026 / Cilt: 30 Sayı: 3

The comparison of compression-distraction and bone transport methods in the treatment of acute bone defects

Akut kemik kayıpları tedavisinde kompresyon-distraksiyon ve kemik kaydırma yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması (Deneysel çalışma)

Pages
317–320
Publication Date
2006-09-11
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

While the union in the proximal site of the defect in rabbits treated with transport method was sufficient, the union in the distal site was not sufficient.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In order to obtain union and lengthening in the tibial defects of adult rabbits; comparison-distraction and bone transport methods were performed by using external fixator.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Clinical, histological and radiological evaluation of the results were done.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:While the union in the proximal site of the defect in rabbits treated with transport method was sufficient, the union in the distal site was not sufficient.
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In order to obtain union and lengthening in the tibial defects of adult rabbits; comparison-distraction and bone transport methods were performed by using external fixator. Clinical, histological and radiological evaluation of the results were done. Sufficient union was observed in all rabbits treated with compression-distraction method. While the union in the proximal site of the defect in rabbits treated with transport method was sufficient, the union in the distal site was not sufficient.

Özet

Tibialarında defekt oluşturduğumuz erişkin tavşanlarda kaynamanın ve uzunluğun elde edilebilmesi amacıyla eksternal fiksatörler kullanarak kompresyon-distraksiyon ve kemik kaydırma yöntemleri uygulandı. Elde edilen sonuçlar klinik, histolojik ve radyolojik oiarak değerlendirildi. Sonuçta kompresyon-distraksiyon yapılan deneklerde ve kemik kaydırması yapılan deneklerin defekt proksimalinaeki kaydırma bölgesinde yeterli kaynama gorülürken, kaydırma yapılan bazı deneklerin defekt distalinde kaynama yetersiz bulundu.

🔖

Cite This Article

Herdem, M., Ersoz, C., Sarpel, Y., Togrul, E., Gulsen, M. (2006). The comparison of compression-distraction and bone transport methods in the treatment of acute bone defects. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 30 Sayı: 3, 317–320. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v30i3.2002

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...