Journals / Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica / 2026 / Cilt: 50 Sayı: 2

Treatment of infected nonunion of the juxta-articular region of the distal tibia

Pages
—
Publication Date
2016-03-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Every patient should be evaluated according to their infection level and bony defects for reconstruction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The purpose of this study was to summarize our clinical results with distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of infected tibial nonunion around the ankle joint.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: Between 1994 and 2009, 13 patients with a mean age of 50 years (range: 27–79 years) underwent tibial reconstruction for the treatment of infected nonunion of the distal tibia, with a mean bone loss of 4.8 cm (range: 1–7 cm).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Every patient should be evaluated according to their infection level and bony defects for reconstruction.
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Distal tibia · infection · juxta-articular

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to summarize our clinical results with distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of infected tibial nonunion around the ankle joint. Methods: Between 1994 and 2009, 13 patients with a mean age of 50 years (range: 27–79 years) underwent tibial reconstruction for the treatment of infected nonunion of the distal tibia, with a mean bone loss of 4.8 cm (range: 1–7 cm). Lengthening over an intramedullary nail as a second procedure was used in 2 patients, bifocal compression and distraction technique in 5 cases, compression with Ilizarov external fixator in 5 cases, and Taylor Spatial Frame (TSF, Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN, USA) in 1 case. At final follow-up, functional and radiographic results were evaluated according to Paley’s bone and functional healing criteria. Results: Mean duration of follow-up was 36 months. Mean external fixation time was 198 days, and mean external fixation index was 29 days/cm. According to Paley’s bone healing criteria, there were 10 excellent, 2 good, and 1 poor result(s); additionally, according to Paley’s functional healing criteria, there were 5 excellent, 6 good, and 2 fair results. There were 11 problems, 5 obstacles, and 1 sequel according to Paley’s classification of complications. There was 1 persisting nonunion, which underwent revision with a retrograde intramedullary nail. Conclusion: External fixator and/or combined treatment are effective and reliable methods to treat infected nonunion of the distal tibia. Every patient should be evaluated according to their infection level and bony defects for reconstruction.

🔖

Cite This Article

Eralp, İ., Kocaoglu, M., Dikmen, G., Azam, M., Balcı, H., Bilen, F. E. (2016). Treatment of infected nonunion of the juxta-articular region of the distal tibia. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, Cilt: 50 Sayı: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1191340

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...