SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Alınteri Zirai Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 33 Sayı: 1

Determination of Germination Characteristics of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in Different Salt Concentrations

Farklı Tuz Konsantrasyonlarında Kinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.)’nın Çimlenme Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi

Mustafa Tan0000-0001-7939-7087
Emre Akçay
Pages
85–91
Publication Date
2018-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The Qhaslala Blanca variety and white population were found as the most sensitive genotypes to salinity during the germination period, while the least sensitivity was determined at Q-52 variety.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Quinoa is known as a resistant plant to environmental factors such as salinity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study was carried out to determine the germination characteristics of the 15 quinoa genotypes (Titicaca, Rainbow, Read Head, Sandoval Mix, Cherry Vanilla, Q-52, French Vanilla, Mint Vanilla, Oro de Valle, Qhaslala Blanca, Moqu Arrochilla and 4 populations) at different salinity levels.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The Qhaslala Blanca variety and white population were found as the most sensitive genotypes to salinity during the germination period, while the least sensitivity was determined at Q-52 variety.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kinoa genotipleri · tuza tolerans · çimlenme

Abstract

Quinoa is known as a resistant plant to environmental factors such as salinity. However, resistance to environmental factors varies according to genotypes. This study was carried out to determine the germination characteristics of the 15 quinoa genotypes (Titicaca, Rainbow, Read Head, Sandoval Mix, Cherry Vanilla, Q-52, French Vanilla, Mint Vanilla, Oro de Valle, Qhaslala Blanca, Moqu Arrochilla and 4 populations) at different salinity levels. The experiment was established under controlled growth conditions in 2015. Petri dishes were placed in randomized plots design with three replications. Germination rate, germination time and sensitivity index values of genotypes were determined at 6 different salinity levels (0, 100, 200, 300, 400 and 500 mM NaCl). Increased salinity has reduced the rate of germination, but prolonged germination time. The Qhaslala Blanca variety and white population were found as the most sensitive genotypes to salinity during the germination period, while the least sensitivity was determined at Q-52 variety.

Özet

Kinoa tuzluluk gibi çevresel faktörlere karşı dayanıklı bir bitki olarak bilinir. Bununla birlikte, bitkilerde çevresel faktörlere dayanıklılık genotiplere göre değişiklik gösterir. Bu çalışma, farklı tuzluluk seviyelerinde 15 kinoa genotipinin çimlenme özelliklerini belirlemek amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Araştırma kontrollü şartlarda, tam şansa bağlı deneme deseninde 3 tekerrürlü olarak kurulmuştur. Genotiplerin çimlenme oranı, çimlenme zamanı ve hassasiyet indeksi değerleri 6 farklı tuzluluk derecesinde (0, 100, 200, 300, 400 ve 500 mM NaCl) incelenmiştir. Artan tuzluluk seviyesi çimlenme oranını düşürmüş, çimlenme süresini uzatmıştır. Çimlenme döneminde tuzluluğa hassasiyeti en yüksek olan genotipler Qhaslala Blanca ve beyaz popülasyon olurken, en az hassasiyet Q-52 çeşidinde belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Tan, M., Akçay, E. (2018). Determination of Germination Characteristics of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in Different Salt Concentrations. Alınteri Zirai Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 33 Sayı: 1, 85–91. https://doi.org/10.28955/alinterizbd.400354

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (28)

  1. Adolf, V.I,, Shabala, S., Andersen, MN., Razzaghi, F. and Jacobsen, S.E., 2012. Varietal differences of quinoa’s tolerance to saline conditions. Plant and Soil, 357:117–129
  2. Adolf, V.I., Jacobsen, S-E. and Shabala, S., 2013. Salt tolerance mechanisms in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Environmental and Experimental Botany, 92:43-54
  3. Cardozo, A. and Tapia, M.E., 1979. Valor Nutritivo. Quinua y la Kaniwa. Cultivos Andinos. In: Tapia, ME. (Ed.), Serie Libros y Materiales Educativos, Vol. 49, Instituto Interamericano de Ciencias Agricolas, Bogota, Columbia, pp. 149-192
  4. Eisa, S., Hussin, S., Geissler, N. and Koyro, H.W., 2012. Effect of NaCl salinity on water relations, photosynthesis and chemical composition of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) as a potential cash crop halophyte, AJCS, 6(2): 357-368
  5. Elkoca, E., Haliloglu, K., Esitken, A. and Ercisli, S., 2007. Hydro- and osmopriming improve chickpea germination. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B-Soil and Plant Science, 57: 193-200 Elkoca, E., Kantar, F. and Güvenç, İ., 2003. Değişik NaCl konsantrasyonlarının kuru fasulye (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotiplerinin çimlenme ve fide gelişmesine etkileri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 34 (1): 1-8
  6. Essa, T.A., 2002. Effect of salinity stress on growth and nutrient composition of three soybean cultivars. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science. 188(2):86-93
  7. FAO, 2011. Quinoa: An ancient crop to contribute to world food security. FAO Regional Office for Latin America and the Caribbean, http://www.fao.org/alc/file/media/pubs/20 11/cultivo_quinua_en.pdf (04.05.2017) Foolad, M.R. and Lin, G.Y., 1997. Genetic potential for salt tolerance during germination in Lycopersicon species. Hortscience, 32: 296-300
  8. Garcia-Huidobro, J., Monteith, J.L. and Squire, G.R., 1982. Time, temperature and germination of pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoides S. and H.). I. Constant temperature. Journal of Experimental Botany, 33: 288-296
  9. Garcia, M., Raes, D. and Jacobsen, S.E., 2003. Evapotranspiration analysis and irrigation requirements of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) in the Bolivian highlands. Agric. Water Manage. 60: 119-134
  10. Gomez-Pando, L.R., Alvarez-Castro, R. and De la Barra, E., 2010. Effect of salt stress on Peruvian germplasm of Chenopodium quinoa Willd: A promising crop. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 196: 391-396
  11. Güldüren Ş. ve Elkoca E., 2012. Kuzey Doğu Anadolu Bölgesi ve Çoruh Vadisi’nden toplanan bazı Fasulye (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.) genotiplerinin çimlenme döneminde tuza toleransları. Atatürk Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg., 43 (1): 29-41
  12. Hariadi, Y., Marandon, K., Tian, Y., Jacobsen, S.-E. and Shabala, S., 2011. Ionic and osmotic relations in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) plant grown at various salinity levels. J. Exp. Bot., 62: 185-193
  13. Herrera, J.D. and Pinto, M., 2009. Importance of ionic and osmotic components of salt stress on the germination of four quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.) selections. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research, 69(4): 477-485
  14. Hirich, A., Allah, R.C. and Beblhabib, O., 2012. Could Quinoa be alternative crop of wheat in the Mediterranean region: Case of morocco Les notes d’alerte du CIHEAM N 86
  15. Jacobsen, S.E., 2003. The worldwide potential for quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Food Rev Int, 19(1–2): 167-177
  16. Jacobsen, S.E., Mujica, A. and Jensen, A.C., 2003. The resistance of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to adverse abiotic factors. Food Reviews International, 19: 1-2
  17. Kaya, M.D., Kaya, G. ve Kolsarıcı, Ö., 2005. Bazı Brassica türlerinin çimlenme ve çıkışı üzerine NaCl konsantrasyonlarının etkileri. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 11 (4): 448-452
  18. Kır, A.E. ve S. Temel, 2016. Iğdır Ovası Kuru Koşullarında Farklı Kinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Çeşit ve Populasyonlarının Tohum Verimi ile Bazı Tarımsal Özelliklerinin Belirlenmesi. Iğdır Üniv. Fen Bil. Enst. Derg., 6(4): 145-154
  19. Kırtok, Y., Veli, S., Tükel, S., Düzenli, S. and Kılınç, M., 1994. Evaluation of salinity stress on germination characteristics and seedling growth of 3 bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Tarla Bitkileri Kongresi, 25-29 Nisan 1994, Cilt I, Agronomi Bildirileri. Ege Üniv. Zir. Fak. Ofset Basımevi, s. 56-61
  20. Koyro, H.W. and Eisa. S.S., 2008. Effect of salinity on composition, viability and germination of seeds of Chenopodium quinoa Willd., Plant Soil, 302: 79-90 Panuccio, M. R., Jacobsen, S. E., Akhtar, S. S., and Muscolo, A., 2014. Effect of saline water on seed germination and early seedling growth of the halophyte quinoa. AOB Plants, 6, plu047
  21. Prado FE., Boero C., Gallardo M. and Gonzalez J.A., 2000. Effect of NaCl on germination, growth, and soluble sugar content in Chenopodium quinoa (Willd.) seeds. Bot Bull Acad Sin, 41: 27-34
  22. Razzaghi, F., Plauborg, F., Jacobsen, S.E., Jensen, C. R. and Andersen, M.N., 2011. Effect of nitrogen and water availability of three soil types on yield, radiation use efficiency and evapotranspiration in field-grown quinoa. Agricultural Water Management, 109: 20-29
  23. Ruiz K. B., Biondi S., Martínez E. A., Orsini F., Antognoni F. and Jacobsen S.E., 2015. Quinoa – a model crop for understanding salt tolerance mechanisms in halophytes. Plant Biosyst. 150: 357-371
  24. Ruiz-Carrasco, K., Antognoni, F., Coulibaly, A.K., Lizardi, S., Covarrubias, A., Martínez, E.A., Molina-Montenegro, M.A., Biondi S. and Zurita-Silva, A., 2011. Variation in salinity tolerance of four lowland genotypes of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) as assessed by growth, Physiological Traits and Sodium Transporter Gene Expression, Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 49: 1333-1341
  25. Sanchez, B., Lemeur, H., Van Damme, P. and Jacobsen, S.E., 2003. Ecophysiological analysis of drought and salinity stress of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Food Reviews International, 19: 111-119
  26. Tan, M. ve Z. Yöndem, 2013. İnsan ve hayvan beslenmesinde yeni bir bitki: Kinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Alınteri, 25(B): 62-66
  27. Wilson, C., Read, J.J., and Abo-Kassem, E., 2002. Effect of mixed-salt salinity on growth and ıon relations of a quinoa and a wheat variety, J Plant Nutr., 25(12): 2689-2704
  28. Yıldırım, E. and Güvenç, I., 2006. Salt tolerance of pepper cultivars during germination and seedling growth. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 30: 347-353