Journals / Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4

A TRIAL OF WELFARE STATE ANALYSIS BY NEW SOCIAL RISKS

YENİ TOPLUMSAL RİSKLER ÜZERİNDEN REFAH DEVLETİ ANALİZİ DENEMESİ

Pages
132–150
Publication Date
2020-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study by defining new social risks, the relations between state and individual based on the change in the field of economy, society, and politics are evaluated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Welfare states have been facing some serious crises, and challenges to their existence and sustainability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The performance of a welfare state whether it is successful or not should be evaluated by its main goals and functions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study by defining new social risks, the relations between state and individual based on the change in the field of economy, society, and politics are evaluated.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:refah devleti · yeni toplumsal riskler · devlet-birey ilişkisi

Abstract

Welfare states have been facing some serious crises, and challenges to their existence and sustainability. The performance of a welfare state whether it is successful or not should be evaluated by its main goals and functions. Individuals can face several risks during their life cycle. Under these circumstances, a decent and humanitarian life can only be achieved by the generosity and high coverage of welfare states. All of these new social risks are about the change in demographic structure, labor markets in post-industrial society and be transformative in the context of individual-state and market relations. By the reality of these new social risks, the welfare state has to implement new policies and mechanisms. Although new social risks are accepted as a national/endogenous source of a challenge to the welfare state, globalization, multi-national companies, and international organizations should also be taken into account as influential exogenous factors. In this study by defining new social risks, the relations between state and individual based on the change in the field of economy, society, and politics are evaluated.

Özet

Refah devletleri 1970’lerden beri varlığına ve sürdürülebilirliğine yönelik önemli meydan okumalar, krizler ve eleştirilerle karşı karşıyadır. Refah devletlerinin başarılı bir performans gösterip göstermediği öncelikle refah devletinin temel amaç ve işlevleri üzerinden değerlendirilmelidir. Bireyler yaşam boyunca pek çok risk ile karşılaşmaktadır. Bu riskler karşısında yaşamlarını düzgün ve insani koşullar altında devam ettirebilmeleri refah devletinin kapsayıcılığı ve bu alanda sağladığı desteklerle ilgilidir. Ortaya çıkan yeni toplumsal riskler işgücü piyasası, demografik yapı gibi sanayi sonrası döneme ait koşullarda yaşanan değişim üzerinden birey-devlet ve piyasa bağlamında dönüştürücü olmaktadır. Refah devletinin kendisi de ortaya çıkan bu yeni toplumsal riskler karşısında yeni politikalar ve araçlar uygulamak zorundadır. Yeni toplumsal riskler genellikle refah devletine yönelik meydan okumanın ulusal/içsel bir kaynağı olarak ele alınırken küreselleşme süreci, çok uluslu şirketler ve uluslararası örgütlerin de dışsal bir faktör olarak ortaya çıkardığı etkiler unutulmamalıdır. Çalışma bu yeni toplumsal riskleri tanımlama amacıyla refah devleti-birey ilişkisinin ekonomik, sosyal ve politik alandaki değişimini incelemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BEKEN, H. G. (2020). A TRIAL OF WELFARE STATE ANALYSIS BY NEW SOCIAL RISKS. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 4, 132–150. https://ajindex.com/articles/118711

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Aiginger, K. (2004). The Economic Agenda: A View from Europe. Review of International Economics, 12(2): 187-206.
  2. Arts, W. ve Gelissen, J. (2010).
  3. Models of the Welfare State. Obinger, H., Pierson, C., Castles, G. ve Leibfried, S. (drl). The Oxford Handbook of Welfare State içinde.New York:USA:Oxford University Press, 569-583.
  4. Bahle, T., Kohl, J., Wendt, C. (2010).
  5. Welfare State. Immerfall, S., Therborn, G.,(ed). Handbook of European Societies:Social Transformations in the 21st Century, (ss.569-583), USA: Oxford University Press.
  6. Bambra, C. (2006). Decommodification and the Worlds of Welfare Revisited. Journal of European Social Policy. 16(1): 73-80.
  7. Barr, N. (2003). The Welfare State as Piggy Bank:Information, Risk,Uncertainty, and the Role of the State. (electronic version), Oxford University Press, November 2003.
  8. Barr, N. (2004). The Economics of the Welfare State (4.Baskı), Oxford University Press.
  9. Begg, I., Draxier, J., Mortensen, J. (2008). Is Social Europe Fit for Globalisation? A Study of the Social Impact of Globalisation in the European Union. European Commission. (Erişim tarihi 4 Nisan 2010), http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/social_situation/docs/simglobe_fin_rep.pdf,
  10. Bonoli, G., (2006). New Social Risks and the Politics of Post-Industrial Social Policies. Armingeon, K., Bonoli, G. (ed), The Politics of Post-Industrial Welfare States: Adapting Post-War Social Policies to New Social Risks (ss.3-26), London: Routledge. Bonoli, G., (2007). Time Matters: Postindustrialization, New Social Risks and Welfare State Adaptation in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 8 (3):333-352.
  11. Buhr, D. (2017). What About Welfare 4.0. CESifo Forum, Volume 18, 4/2017, (15-21).
  12. Camdessus, M. (1998), Worldwide Crisis in the Welfare State:What Next in the Context of Globalization?, (Erişim tarihi: 12 Nisan 2019), https://www.imf.org/en/News/Articles/2015/09/28/04/53/sp101598,
  13. Daly, M., Rake, K. (2003). Gender and the Welfare State:Care, Work and Welfare in Europe and the USA. (1.Baskı), UK:Polity Press.
  14. Degryse, C. (2016). Digitalisation of the Economy and Its Impact on Labour Markets. ETUI Working Paper: 2016.02. Diamond, P., Lodge, G. (2013). European Welfare States after the Crisis:Changing Public Attitudes, Policy Network Paper. EGGSIE (EU Expert Group on Gender, Social Inclusion and Employment ), (2005). Reconciliation of Work and Private Life: A Comparative Review of Thirty European Countries. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publicatio