SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Yükseköğretim Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2

Future of the ChatGPT in Higher Education: New Insights From Young Researchers

Yükseköğretimde Chatgpt’nin Geleceği: Genç Araştırmacılardan Yeni Bakış Açıları

Ayşe Merve Urfa Yılmaz(YILDIZ TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5485-2845
Nazlı Yüceol(İSTANBUL GELİŞİM ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8416-5707
Pages
317–335
Publication Date
2025-08-07
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicate that the employment of ChatGPT will be unavoidable in the future, and the discussion emphasizes the necessary steps for fostering its utilization.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study investigates the perspectives of young researchers employed in higher educational institutions in Istanbul regarding the future use of ChatGPT.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To gather information, in-depth interviews were conducted with 20 young researchers from the fields of science and engineering, social sciences, and health sciences.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicate that the employment of ChatGPT will be unavoidable in the future, and the discussion emphasizes the necessary steps for fostering its utilization.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yapay Zeka (YZ) · ChatGPT · ChatGPT’nin Geleceği

Abstract

This study investigates the perspectives of young researchers employed in higher educational institutions in Istanbul regarding the future use of ChatGPT. Qualitative research methodology was used in this study. To gather information, in-depth interviews were conducted with 20 young researchers from the fields of science and engineering, social sciences, and health sciences. The obtained data was analyzed using thematic analysis, which uncovered five main themes: future expectations, ethical practices, integration of ChatGPT into education and research, future concerns arising from ChatGPT, and benefits achieved from ChatGPT usage. The findings indicate that the employment of ChatGPT will be unavoidable in the future, and the discussion emphasizes the necessary steps for fostering its utilization. These steps are presented in a process framework. The process framework focuses on what actions to take and how to implement them. Accordingly, it has been identified that both students and academics need to be trained on the ethical and effective use of ChatGPT. After these trainings, ChatGPT should be integrated into education and teaching with various usage guides and application instructions. This research offers valuable insights into what can be done to promote the ethical, effective, and proper utilization of AI tools like ChatGPT in higher education.

Özet

Bu çalışma, İstanbul’daki Yükseköğretim kurumlarında çalışan genç araştırmacıların ChatGPT’nin gelecekteki kullanımına ilişkin görüşlerini araştırmaktadır. Bu çalışmada nitel araştırma yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Veri toplamak üzere fen bilimleri, sosyal bilimler ve sağlık bilimleri alanından faaliyet gösteren 20 genç araştırmacıyla derinlemesine görüşmeler yapılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler, tematik analiz yöntemi ile analiz edilmiş ve beş ana tema ortaya çıkmıştır. Bunlar: Gelecek beklentileri, etik uygulamalar, ChatGPT’nin eğitim ve araştırmaya entegrasyonu, ChatGPT’den kaynaklanan gelecekteki endişeler ve ChatGPT kullanımından elde edilen faydalardır. Bulgular, ChatGPT’nin gelecekte kullanımının kaçınılmaz olacağını göstermekte ve kullanımını teşvik etmek için gerekli adımları vurgulamaktadır. Bu adımlar bir süreç çerçevesinde sunulmaktadır. Süreç çerçevesinde ne yapmalıyız ve nasıl yapmalıyız sorularına odaklanılmıştır. Bu doğrultuda ChatGPT’nin etik ve etkili kullanılması hakkında hem öğrencilere hem de akademisyenlere eğitim verilmesi gerektiği görülmüştür. Bu eğitimlerden sonra ChatGPT’nin eğitim ve öğretime çeşitli kullanım rehberleri ve uygulama yönergeleri ile entegre edilmesi gerekmektedir. Sonuç olarak bu araştırma, ChatGPT gibi yapay zeka araçlarının Yükseköğretimde etik, etkili ve uygun şekilde kullanımını teşvik etmek için neler yapılabileceğine dair değerli görüşler sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yılmaz, A. M. U., Yüceol, N. (2025). Future of the ChatGPT in Higher Education: New Insights From Young Researchers. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2, 317–335. https://doi.org/10.53478/yuksekogretim.1536216

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (105)

  1. Abadie, A., Chowdhury, S., & Mangla, S. K. (2024). A shared journey: Experiential perspective and empirical evidence of virtual social robot ChatGPT’s priori acceptance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 201, 123202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123202
  2. Abdelhafiz, A. S., Ali, A., Maaly, A. M., Ziady, H. H., Sultan, E. A., & Mahgoub, M. A. (2024). Knowledge, perceptions and attitude of researchers towards using ChatGPT in research. Journal of Medical Systems, 48(1), 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-024-02044-4
  3. Ahadzadeh, A. S., Wu, S. L., & Sijia, X. (2024). Exploring academic intentions for ChatGPT: A perspective from the theory of planned behavior. ASR: Chiang Mai University Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 11(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.12982/cmujasr.2024.016
  4. Aithal, P. S., & Aithal, S. (2023). Application of ChatGPT in higher education and research–A futuristic analysis. International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters (IJAEML), 7(3), 168-194. https://doi.org/10.47992/IJAEML.2581.7000.0193
  5. Akıllı, E. (2024, Temmuz 3). Yapay zekânın akademik yazımdaki rolü: Faydalar, riskler ve etik düşünceler. Kriter Dergi. https://kriterdergi.com/siyaset/yapay-zeknin-akademik-yazimdaki-rolu-faydalar-riskler-ve-etik-dusunceler
  6. AlQershi, N. A., Thursamy, R., Alzoraiki, M., Ali, G. A., Mohammed Emam, A. S., & Nasir, M. D. B. M. (2024). Is ChatGPT a source to enhance firms’ strategic value and business sustainability? Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-05-2023-0064
  7. Aljaž, T. (2024). Leveraging ChatGPT for enhanced logical analysis in the theory of constraints thinking process. Organizacija, 57(2), 202-214. https://doi.org/10.2478/orga-2024-0014
  8. Ardichvili, A., Dirani, K., Jabarkhail, S., El Mansour, W., & Aboulhosn, S. (2024). Using generative AI in human resource development: An applied research study. Human Resource Development International, 27(3), 388-409. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2024.2337964
  9. Battour, M., Mady, K., Salaheldeen, M., Ratnasari, R. T., Sallem, R., & Al Sinawi, S. (2024). Halal tourism and ChatGPT: An overview of current trends and future research directions. Journal of Islamic Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-11-2023-0379
  10. Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500
  11. Bettayeb, A. M., Abu Talib, M., Sobhe Altayasinah, A. Z., & Dakalbab, F. (2024, July). Exploring the impact of ChatGPT: Conversational AI in education. In Frontiers in Education, 9, 1379796. Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1379796
  12. Bhullar, P. S., Joshi, M., & Chugh, R. (2024). ChatGPT in higher education-a synthesis of the literature and a future research agenda. Education and Information Technologies, 1, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12723-x
  13. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  14. Budler, L. C., Gosak, L., & Stiglic, G. (2023). Review of artificial intelligence-based question-answering systems in healthcare. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 13(2), e1487. https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1487
  15. Cahan, P., & Treutlein, B. (2023). A conversation with ChatGPT on the role of computational systems biology in stem cell research. Stem Cell Reports, 18(1), 1–2.
  16. Chen, Q., Li, Y., Qiu, J., & Yan, M. (2024). ChatGPT in higher education: Towards the future of technology-facilitated learning. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 32, 86-90. https://doi.org/10.54097/ah2tf031
  17. Costa, K., Ntsobi, P. M., & Mfolo, L. (2024). Challenges, benefits and recommendations for using generative artificial intelligence in academic writing–A case of ChatGPT. Medicon Engineering Themes, 7(4), 162-171. https://doi.org/10.55162/MCET.07.236
  18. Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
  19. De Angelis, L., Baglivo, F., Arzilli, G., Privitera, G. P., Ferragina, P., Tozzi, A. E., & Rizzo, C. (2023). ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: The new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1166120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1166120
  20. DeJeu, E. B. (2024). Using generative AI to facilitate data analysis and visualization: A case study of Olympic athletes. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 38(3), 299–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/10506519241239923
  21. Duong, C. D., Vu, T. N., & Ngo, T. V. N. (2023). Applying a modified technology acceptance model to explain higher education students’ usage of ChatGPT: A serial multiple mediation model with knowledge sharing as a moderator. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(3), 100883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100883
  22. Duong, C. D., Nguyen, T. H., Chu, T. V., Pham, T. V., & Do, N. D. (2024). Whether ChatGPT adoption inspires higher education students’ digital entrepreneurial intention? An integrated model of the SCCT and the TPB. International Journal of Innovation Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijis.2024.100063
  23. Dwivedi, Y. K., Pandey, N., Currie, W., & Micu, A. (2024). Leveraging ChatGPT and other generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based applications in the hospitality and tourism industry: Practices, challenges and research agenda. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 36(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-05-2023-0686
  24. Eardley, I. (2023). ChatGPT: What does it mean for scientific research and publishing. BJU International, 131(4), 381–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15995
  25. Elkefi, S., Tounsi, A., & Kefi, M. A. (2024). Use of ChatGPT for education by engineering students in developing countries: A mixed-methods study. Behaviour & Information Technology, 43(11), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2024.2354428
  26. Erlandson, D. A. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Sage.
  27. Fatima, M. (2023). Revolutionizing interaction: Exploring the impact of ChatGPT in education. International Journal of Advances in Business and Management Research (IJABMR), 1(2), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.62674/ijabmr.2024.v1i02.003
  28. Frederico, G. F. (2023). ChatGPT in supply chains: Initial evidence of applications and potential research agenda. Logistics, 7(2), 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics7020026
  29. Gao, Z., Cheah, J. H., Lim, X. J., & Luo, X. (2024). Enhancing academic performance of business students using generative AI: An interactive-constructive-active-passive (ICAP) self-determination perspective. The International Journal of Management Education, 22(2), 100958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100958
  30. Giordano, V., Spada, I., Chiarello, F., & Fantoni, G. (2024). The impact of ChatGPT on human skills: A quantitative study on Twitter data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 203, 123389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123389
  31. Graham, F. (2023). Daily briefing: ChatGPT listed as author on research papers. Nature, 614(7949), 598. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00188-w
  32. Halaweh, M. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Strategies for responsible implementation. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2), ep421. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13036
  33. Haddud, A. (2024). ChatGPT in supply chains: Exploring potential applications, benefits and challenges. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 35(9), 1515-1534. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-02-2024-0075
  34. Hamilton, L., Elliott, D., Quick, A., Smith, S., & Choplin, V. (2023). Exploring the use of AI in qualitative analysis: A comparative study of guaranteed income data. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 16094069231201504. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231201504
  35. Higgs, J. M., & Stornaiuolo, A. (2024). Being human in the age of generative AI: Young people’s ethical concerns about writing and living with machines. Reading Research Quarterly, 59(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.552
  36. Hisan, U. K., & Amri, M. M. (2022). Artificial intelligence for human life: A critical opinion from medical bioethics perspective–Part I. Journal of Public Health Sciences, 1(2), 100-111. https://doi.org/10.56741/jphs.v1i02.214
  37. Hitch, D. (2024). Artificial intelligence augmented qualitative analysis: The way of the future? Qualitative Health Research, 34(7), 595-606. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323231217392
  38. Ho, W. L. J., Koussayer, B., & Sujka, J. (2023). ChatGPT: Friend or foe in medical writing? An example of how ChatGPT can be utilized in writing case reports. Surgery in Practice and Science, 14, 100185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100185
  39. Holzinger, A., Keiblinger, K., Holub, P., Zatloukal, K., & Müller, H. (2023). AI for life: Trends in artificial intelligence for biotechnology. New Biotechnology, 74, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2023.02.001
  40. Javaid, M., Haleem, A., & Singh, R. P. (2023). ChatGPT for healthcare services: An emerging stage for an innovative perspective. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(1), 100105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100105
  41. Jing, Y., Wang, H., Chen, X., & Wang, C. (2024). What factors will affect the effectiveness of using ChatGPT to solve programming problems? A quasi-experimental study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02751-w
  42. Kanbach, D. K., Heiduk, L., Blueher, G., Schreiter, M., & Lahmann, A. (2024). The GenAI is out of the bottle: Generative artificial intelligence from a business model innovation perspective. Review of Managerial Science, 18(4), 1189–1220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-023-00696-z
  43. Karaali, G. (2023). Artificial intelligence, basic skills, and quantitative literacy. Numeracy, 16(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.16.1.1438
  44. Kleiman, M. G. (2023, Şubat 6). Educators need to understand and embrace artificial intelligence writing tools. EdSource. https://edsource.org/2023/educators-need-to-understand-and-embrace-artificial-intelligence-writing-tools/685299
  45. Kim, S. G. (2023). Using ChatGPT for language editing in scientific articles. Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 45(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-023-00381-x
  46. Kiryakova, G., & Angelova, N. (2023). ChatGPT—A challenging tool for the university professors in their teaching practice. Education Sciences, 13(10), 1056. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13101056
  47. Koc, E., Hatipoglu, S., Kivrak, O., Celik, C., & Koc, K. (2023). Houston, we have a problem!: The use of ChatGPT in responding to customer complaints. Technology in Society, 74, 102333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102333
  48. Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
  49. Korkmaz, A., Aktürk, C., & Talan, T. (2023). Analyzing the user’s sentiments of ChatGPT using Twitter data. Iraqi Journal For Computer Science and Mathematics, 4(2), 202-214. https://doi.org/10.52866/ijcsm.2023.02.02.018
  50. Li, X., Feng, H., Yang, H., & Huang, J. (2024). Can ChatGPT reduce human financial analysts’ optimistic biases? Economic and Political Studies, 12(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/20954816.2023.2276965
  51. Li, S., Guo, Z., & Zang, X. (2024). Advancing the production of clinical medical devices through ChatGPT. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 52(3), 441–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03300-3
  52. Li, M., Enkhtur, A., Cheng, F., & Yamamoto, B. A. (2023). Ethical implications of ChatGPT in higher education: A scoping review. arXiv. [preprint], arXiv:2311.14378. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.14378
  53. Liebrenz, M., Schleifer, R., Buadze, A., Bhugra, D., & Smith, A. (2023). Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: Ethical challenges for medical publishing. The Lancet Digital Health, 5(3), e105-e106. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00019-5
  54. Lin, Y. (2024). Adapting to the AI era: Higher education’s opportunities and challenges with ChatGPT. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Social Psychology and Humanity Studies. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/40/20240734
  55. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
  56. Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790
  57. Liu, D., Ho, E., Weeks, R., & Bridgeman, A. J. (2023, Ocak 20). How AI can be used meaningfully by teachers and students in 2023. Teaching@Sydney, the University of Sydney. https://educational-innovation.sydney.edu.au/teaching@sydney/how-ai-can-be-usedmeaningfully-by-teachers-and-students-in-2023/
  58. Lo, C. K. (2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410
  59. Looi, M. K. (2023). Sixty seconds on. ChatGPT. BMJ 380, 205. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p205
  60. Lund, B. D., & Wang, T. (2023). Chatting about ChatGPT: How may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries? Library Hi Tech News, 40(3), 26-29. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4333415
  61. Maita, I., Saide, S., Putri, A. M., & Muwardi, D. (2024). Proscons of artificial intelligence-ChatGPT adoption in education settings: A literature review and future research agendas. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 52(3), 27-42. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2024.3394540
  62. Marron, L. (2023). Exploring the potential of ChatGPT 3.5 in higher education: Benefits, limitations, and academic integrity. In Handbook of research on redesigning teaching, learning, and assessment in the digital era (pp. 326–349). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8292-6.ch017
  63. Mbwambo, N. M., & Kaaya, P. B. (2024). ChatGPT in education: Applications, concerns and recommendations. Journal of ICT Systems, 2(1), 107–124. https://doi.org/10.56279/jicts.v2i1.87
  64. Mogali, S. R. (2024). Initial impressions of ChatGPT for anatomy education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 17(2), 444–447. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.2261
  65. Moons, P., & Van Bulck, L. (2023). ChatGPT: Can artificial intelligence language models be of value for cardiovascular nurses and allied health professionals? European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, 22(7), e55–e59. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvad022
  66. Moore, A. (Presenter). (2023, Ocak 17). How will universities confront the rising use of AI in academia? [Radio Broadcast]. ABC Melbourne. https://www.abc.net.au/melbourne/programs/mornings/how-will-universities-confront-the-rising-use-of-ai-in-academia/101862702
  67. Mucharraz y Cano, Y., Venuti, F., & Martinez, R. H. (2023). ChatGPT and AI text generators: Should academia adapt or resist? Harvard Business Publishing Education. https://hbsp.harvard.edu/inspiring-minds/chatgpt-and-ai-text-generators-should-academia-adapt-or-resist
  68. Nazari, M., & Saadi, G. (2024). Developing effective prompts to improve communication with ChatGPT: A formula for higher education stakeholders. Discover Education, 3(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00122-w
  69. Nepal, T. K. (2024). Exploring the applications and challenges of ChatGPT in research and academia: A comprehensive review. West Science Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(5), 1043–1050. https://doi.org/10.58812/wsis.v2i05.729
  70. Opara, E. C., Adalikwu, M. T., & Tolorunleke, C. A. (2023). ChatGPT for teaching, learning and research: Prospects and challenges. Global Academic Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(2), 33-40.
  71. Pathak, V., Jena, B., & Kalra, S. (2013). Qualitative research. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 4(3), 192. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.115389
  72. Paul, J., Ueno, A., & Dennis, C. (2023). ChatGPT and consumers: Benefits, pitfalls and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47(4), 1213–1225. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12928
  73. PWC. (2023). Yeni denklemin yeni trendleri. https://www.pwc.com.tr/tr/gundem/ceo-gorusleri/yeni-denklemin-yeni-trendleri.html
  74. Rasul, T., Nair, S., Kalendra, D., Robin, M., de Oliveira Santini, F., Ladeira, W. J.,. & Heathcote, L. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29
  75. Raile, P. (2024). The usefulness of ChatGPT for psychotherapists and patients. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–8.
  76. Ray, P. P. (2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3, 121–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003
  77. Rawas, S. (2024). ChatGPT: Empowering lifelong learning in the digital age of higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(6), 6895–6908. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12114-8
  78. Riger, S., & Sigurvinsdottir, R. (2016). Thematic analysis. In A. T. Johnson, Handbook of methodological approaches to community-based research: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods (pp. 33-41). Oxford University Press.
  79. Rozado, D. (2023). The political biases of ChatGPT. Social Sciences, 12(3), 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12030148
  80. Sabzalieva, E. & Valentini, A. (2023). ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in higher education: quick start guide. Caracas: IESALC. https://www.iesalc.unesco.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/ChatGPT-and-Artificial-Intelligence-in-higher-education-Quick-Start-guide_EN_FINAL.pdf
  81. Sallam, M., Elsayed, W., Al-Shorbagy, M., Barakat, M., El Khatib, S., Ghach, W.,. & Malaeb, D. (2024, Ağustos). ChatGPT usage and attitudes are driven by perceptions of usefulness, ease of use, risks, and psycho-social impact: A study among university students in the UAE. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1414758. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3905717/v1
  82. Salifu, I., Arthur, F., Arkorful, V., Abam Nortey, S., & Solomon Osei-Yaw, R. (2024). Economics students’ behavioural intention and usage of ChatGPT in higher education: A hybrid structural equation modelling-artificial neural network approach. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2300177. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2300177
  83. Sasuke, F., & Takemoto, K. (2023). Revisiting the political biases of ChatGPT. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 6, 1199343. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202305.1540.v2
  84. Sedaghat, S. (2024). The future role of radiologists in the artificial intelligence-driven hospital. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 52, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-023-03300-3
  85. Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., & Javed, I. (2024). ChatGPT awareness, acceptance, and adoption in higher education: The role of trust as a cornerstone. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00478-x
  86. Shapka, J. D., Domene, J. F., Khan, S., & Yang, L. M. (2016). Online versus in-person interviews with adolescents: An exploration of data equivalence. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 361-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.016
  87. Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.3233/efi-2004-22201
  88. Skavronskaya, L., Hadinejad, A., & Cotterell, D. (2023). Reversing the threat of artificial intelligence to opportunity: A discussion of ChatGPT in tourism education. Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 23(2), 253-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/15313220.2023.2196658
  89. Strzelecki, A., Cicha, K., Rizun, M., & Rutecka, P. (2024). Acceptance and use of ChatGPT in the academic community. Education and Information Technologies, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12765-1
  90. Sullivan, M., Kelly, A., & McLaughlan, P. (2023). ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.17
  91. Talaei-Khoei, A., Yang, A. T., & Masialeti, M. (2024). How does incorporating ChatGPT within a firm reinforce agility-mediated performance? The moderating role of innovation infusion and firms’ ethical identity. Technovation, 132, 102975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.102975
  92. Tafesse, W., & Wien, A. (2024). ChatGPT’s applications in marketing: A topic modeling approach. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 42(4), 666–683. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-10-2023-0526
  93. Tangadulrat, P., Sono, S., & Tangtrakulwanich, B. (2023). Using ChatGPT for clinical practice and medical education: Cross-sectional survey of medical students’ and physicians’ perceptions. JMIR Medical Education, 9(1), e50658. https://doi.org/10.2196/50658
  94. Tepe, M., & Emekli, E. (2024). Decoding medical jargon: The use of AI language models (ChatGPT-4, BARD, Microsoft Copilot) in radiology reports. Patient Education and Counseling, 126, 108307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2024.108307
  95. Vecchiarini, M., & Somià, T. (2023). Redefining entrepreneurship education in the age of artificial intelligence: An explorative analysis. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(3), 100879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100879
  96. Wakelin, K. J., McAra-Couper, J., & Fleming, T. (2024). Using an online platform for conducting face-to-face interviews. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 16094069241234183. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241234183
  97. Wikipedia. (2024). İstanbul’daki üniversiteler listesi. https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%B0stanbul%27daki_%C3%BCniversiteler_listesi
  98. Wilson, O., & Billam, J. (2023). ChatGPT in June 2023: An annotated bibliography for ALL professionals. Journal of Academic Language and Learning, 17(1), T9-T15.
  99. Xie, X., & Ding, S. (2023, Eylül). Opportunities, challenges, strategies, and reforms for ChatGPT in higher education. In 2023 International Conference on Educational Knowledge and Informatization (EKI) (pp. 14–18). IEEE.
  100. Xing, Y., Zhang, J. Z., Teng, G., & Zhou, X. (2024). Voices in the digital storm: Unraveling online polarization with ChatGPT. Technology in Society, 77, 102534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102534
  101. Yu, S., Yang, Y., Li, J., Guo, K., Wang, Z., & Liu, Y. (2024). Exploring low-carbon and sustainable urban transformation design using ChatGPT and artificial bee colony algorithm. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02765-4
  102. Zeb, A., Ullah, R., & Karim, R. (2024). Exploring the role of ChatGPT in higher education: Opportunities, challenges and ethical considerations. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 41(1), 99-11. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-04-2023-0046
  103. Looi, M. K. (2023). Sixty seconds on. ChatGPT. BMJ 380, 205. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p205
  104. Rasul, T., Nair, S., Kalendra, D., Robin, M., de Oliveira Santini, F., Ladeira, W. J.,. & Heathcote, L. (2023). The role of ChatGPT in higher education: Benefits, challenges, and future research directions. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.29
  105. Sallam, M., Elsayed, W., Al-Shorbagy, M., Barakat, M., El Khatib, S., Ghach, W.,. & Malaeb, D. (2024, Ağustos). ChatGPT usage and attitudes are driven by perceptions of usefulness, ease of use, risks, and psycho-social impact: A study among university students in the UAE. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1414758. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3905717/v1