SavedAdd your journal

Journals / BELLETEN / 2018 / Cilt: 82 Sayı: 295

Investigations in the Cave of Ambarderesi Kızlar Oğlanlar Sarayı (Manastırı) in İvriz

İvriz Ambarderesi Kızlar Oğlanlar Sarayı (Manastırı) Mağarası’nda Araştırmalar

Çiğdem Maner(KOÇ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İNSANİ BİLİMLER VE EDEBİYAT FAKÜLTESİ, ARKEOLOJİ VE SANAT TARİHİ BÖLÜMÜ)
Emre Kuruçayırlı(BOĞAZİÇİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, FEN-EDEBİYAT FAKÜLTESİ, KİMYA BÖLÜMÜ)
Journal
BELLETEN
Pages
785–802
Publication Date
2018-12-01
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The significance of the cave, which was investigated during the survey conducted at İvriz and Ambarderesi, and the cup mark found at its entrance is discussed within the context of religious rituals of the Neo Hittite period.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A relief very similar to the king Warpalawas’ relief of İvriz lies on the slopes of the Ambarderesi valley, located in the Halkapınar district of Konya.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A natural cave situated 50 m north of the apses of the church has been examined and documented for the first time during the 2016 survey season as part of the Konya Ereğli Survey Project (KEYAR).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The significance of the cave, which was investigated during the survey conducted at İvriz and Ambarderesi, and the cup mark found at its entrance is discussed within the context of religious rituals of the Neo Hittite period.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:İvriz · Mağara · Geç Hitit

Abstract

A relief very similar to the king Warpalawas’ relief of İvriz lies on the slopes of the Ambarderesi valley, located in the Halkapınar district of Konya. On the opposite slope, the remains of a monastery from the Middle Byzantine period, known as the Palace of Boys and Girls (Kızlar Oğlanlar Sarayı) by the locals, is located. A natural cave situated 50 m north of the apses of the church has been examined and documented for the first time during the 2016 survey season as part of the Konya Ereğli Survey Project (KEYAR). This article discusses the results of the systematical survey conducted in the Halkapınar district and the discovered Bronze and Iron Age settlements. The significance of the cave, which was investigated during the survey conducted at İvriz and Ambarderesi, and the cup mark found at its entrance is discussed within the context of religious rituals of the Neo Hittite period.

Özet

Konya’nın Halkapınar ilçesi sınırlarındaki Ambarderesi Vadisinin yamacında İvriz’deki kral Warpalawas’ın anıtsal kaya kabartmasının yakın bir benzeri bulunmaktadır. Bunun karşı yamacında ise yerel halk tarafından Kızlar Oğlanlar Sarayı olarak adlandırılan Orta Bizans Dönemine ait manastırın kalıntıları konumlanmıştır. Girişi kilisenin apsisinin yaklaşık 50 m kuzeyinde bulunan doğal mağara Konya Ereğli Yüzey Araştırma Projesi (KEYAR) çerçevesinde 2016 yılı yüzey araştırması sezonunda ilk defa incelenmiş ve belgelenmiştir. Bu makalede, 2014-2016 arazi çalışmalarında Halkapınar ilçesinde yapılan sistematik yüzey araştırmaları sonuçları ve bölgenin Tunç – Demir Çağı yerleşimleri tartışılmaktadır. Yüzey araştırması kapsamında İvriz’de, Ambarderesi’nde ve mağarada gerçekleştirilen yüzey araştırmalarından elde edilen bulgular sunularak, mağaranın ve girişinde bulunan libasyon çukurunun önemi Geç Hitit Dönemi kültsel arınma ve temizlenme ritüelleri ile ilişkisi tartışılacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Maner, Ç., Kuruçayırlı, E. (2018). Investigations in the Cave of Ambarderesi Kızlar Oğlanlar Sarayı (Manastırı) in İvriz. BELLETEN, Cilt: 82 Sayı: 295, 785–802. https://doi.org/10.37879/belleten.2018.785

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (40)

  1. Akurgal, Ekrem, Die Kunst der Hethiter, Hirmer Verlag, München 1961.
  2. Barnett, Richard David, “The Phrygian Rock Facades and the Hittite Monu- ments”, BirOr 10 (1953), ss. 78-83.
  3. Beckmann, Gary, Hittite Diplomatic Texts, Scholars Press, Atlanta 1996.
  4. Bier, Lionel, “A Second Relief at Ivriz”, Journal of Near Eastern Studies 35-2 (1976), ss. 115-126.
  5. Çambel, Halet – Özyar, Aslı, Karatepe Aslantaş: Azatiwataya, die Bildwerke Band 1, Verlag Philipp von Zabern, Mainz 2003.
  6. Çınaroğlu, Aykut, “New Iron Age Discoveries Around Niğde”, Anadolu Medeni- yetleri Müzesini Koruma ve Yaşatma Derneği Yayını, No 2 (1989) ss. 1-8.
  7. Dallegio d’Alessio, Eugéne, “La vallée d’Ambar-Deressi dans le Taurus Cilicien”, Revue des études Byzantines, Tome 24, (1966), ss. 284-291.
  8. Dinçol, Belkıs, “New Archaeological and Epigraphical Finds from Ivriz”, Tel Aviv, 21 (1994), ss. 117-128.
  9. Dupré, Sylevstre, La Céramique de L’âge du Bronze et De L’âge du Fer, Paris, 1983
  10. Ehrinhaus, Horst, Das Ende, das ein Anfang war, Nünnerich-Asmus Verlag, Mainz am Rhein 2014.
  11. Gonnet, Hatice, “Les montagnes d’Asie Mineure d’après les textes Hittites”, RHA, 83 (1968), ss. 95-171.
  12. ____________, “The Cemetry and Rock-Cut Tombs at Beyköy Phrygia”, ed. Altan Çilingiroğlu, D. H. French, The Proceedings of the Third Anatolian Iron Ages Colloquium held at Van, 6-12 August 1990 (1994), ss. 75-90.
  13. Gordon, Edmund Irwin, “The Meaning of the Ideogram dKASKAL.KUR = “Underground Water-Course” and Its Significance for Bronze Age Historical Geography”, Journal of Cuneiform Studies, Vol. 21 (1967), ss.70-88.
  14. Götze, Albrecht, The Hittite Ritual of Tunnawi, American Oriental Series, New Ha- ven 1938.
  15. Haas, Volkert “Die Unterwelts- und Jenseitsvorstellungen im hethitischen Klein- asien, Orientalia (1976), ss. 197-212. ____________
  16. Hawkins, John David, Corpus of Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscriptions: Volume I, Inscriptions of the Iron Age: Part 1, De Gruyter, Berlin, New York 2000a. ____________
  17. Corpus of Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscriptions, Volume I, Inscriptions of the
  18. Iron Age: Part 3 Plates, Berlin, New York 2000b. ____________
  19. “Hittite Monuments and Their Sanctity”, ed. Anacleto D’Agos tino, Valentina Orsi, Giulia Torri, Sacred Landscapes of Hittites and Luwians (2015), ss. 1-9.
  20. Karauğuz, Güngör – Kunt, Halil İbrahim, “İvriz Kaya Anıtları ve Çevresi Üzerine bir Araştırma”, Arkeoloji ve Sanat, 122 (2006), ss. 23-50.
  21. Kohlmeyer, Kay, ‟Felsbilder der hethitischen Grossreichszeit”, Acta Praehistorica et Archaeologica, 15 (1983), ss. 7-112.
  22. Laroche, Emmanuel, “Etudes de toponymie asianique”, RHA, 19/69 (1961), ss.57-93.
  23. Luke, Christina - Roosevelt, Christopher H., “Cup-Marks and Citadels: Evidence for Libation in 2nd-Millennium B.C.E. Western Anatolia”, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, No. 378 (2017), ss. 1-23.
  24. Maner, Çiğdem, “Preliminary Report on the First Season of the Konya-Ereğli (KEYAR) Survey 2013”, Anatolia Antiqua, XXII (2014), ss. 343-360. ____________
  25. “Preliminary Report on the Second Season of the Konya-Ereğli (KEYAR) Survey 2014”, Anatolia Antiqua, XXIII (2015a), ss. 343-360. ____________
  26. “Konya ili Ereğli, Halkapınar, Karapınar ve Emirgazi 2013 Yılı Yüzey Araştırmaları (KEYAR)”, Araştırma Sonuçları Toplantısı, 32/1 (2015b), ss. 27-46. ____________
  27. “Preliminary Report on the Third Season of the Konya-Ereğli (KEYAR) Survey 2015”, Anatolia Antiqua, XXIV (2016a), 225-252. ____________
  28. “Su Kaynağını Düzenli Olarak Ziyaret Et ” İvriz Su Kült Merkezi ve Çevresinde Yeni Araştırmalar”, Aktüel Arkeoloji (2016b), ss. 8-10. ____________
  29. “Preliminary Report on the Fourth Season of the Konya-Ereğli Survey”, Anatolia Antiqua, 25 (2017a), ss. 95-114. ____________
  30. “Konya ili Ereğli, Halkapınar, Karapınar ve Emirgazi 2014 Yılı Yüzey Araştırmaları (KEYAR), AST 34/1 (2017b), ss. 1-26. ____________
  31. “Konya ili Ereğli, Halkapınar, Karapınar ve Emirgazi 2015 Yılı Yüzey Araştırmları (KEYAR)”, AST 34/2 (2017c), ss. 211-226. ____________
  32. “From the Konya Plain to the Bolkar Mountains: The 2015-16 Campaigns of the KEYAR Survey Project”, ed. Sharon R. Steadman, Greg ory McMahon, The Archaeology of Anatolia: Recent Discoveries, Volume II (2017d) ss. 341-367.
  33. Matsumura, Kimiyoshi, Die eisenzeitliche Keramik in Zentralanatolien aufgrund der Grund- lage der Ausgrabungen von Kaman-Kalehöyük, Freie Universitat Berlin, Yayınlan- mamış Doktora Tezi, Berlin 2005.
  34. Miller, Jared, L., Royal Hittite Instructions and Related Administrative Texts, Society of Biblical Literature, Writing from the Ancient World, Atlanta 2013.
  35. Orthmann, Winfried, Untersuchungen zur Späthethitischen Kunst, Bonn 1971.
  36. Otten, Heinrich, “KASKAL.KUR”, ed. Edzard Dietz O., Reallexikon der Assyriolo- gie und vorderasiatischen Archaeologie, 5-6 (1980), ss. 463-464. ____________
  37. “Die Bronzetafel aus Boğazköy. Ein Staatsvertag Tuthalijas IV”, Studien zu den Boğazköy - Texten Beiheft 1 (1988), Wiesbaden. Reyhan, Esma, Hitit Devletinde Siyaset ve Yönetim, Bilgin Yayınları, Ankara 2017.
  38. Ussishkin, David, “Hollows, “Cup-Marks”, and Hittite Stone Monuments”, Ana- tolian Studies, Vol. 25 (1975), ss. 85-103.
  39. Yandım Aydın, Sercan, “Late Antique Anatolia and its Ascetics”, ed. Çiğdem Maner, Crossroads, Konya Plain from Prehistory to the Byzantine Period – Kavşaklar Prehistorik Çağ’dan Bizans Dönemine Konya Ovası (baskıda).
  40. Orthmann, Winfried, Untersuchungen zur Späthethitischen Kunst, Bonn 1971.