SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 24 Sayı: 1

Sunk-Costs, Exports and Real Exchange Rate Relation

BATIK MALİYETLER, İHRACAT VE REEL KUR İLİŞKİSİ

Aslıhan Atabek Demirhan(Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası)0000-0003-3789-4530
Kurmaş Akdoğan(Türkiye Cumhuriyet Merkez Bankası)0000-0002-1297-3737
Pages
49–58
Publication Date
2023-01-22
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Estimation results show that exporting firms are exposed to high sunk costs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Most of the exportation costs are sunk and those sunk-costs generates hysteresis in the export decisions of the firms.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Firm-level observed hysteresis in the export behavior may lead to deterioration in the exchange rate export relation at macro-level.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Estimation results show that exporting firms are exposed to high sunk costs.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Batık maliyetler · ihracat davranışları · reel kur

Abstract

Most of the exportation costs are sunk and those sunk-costs generates hysteresis in the export decisions of the firms. Firm-level observed hysteresis in the export behavior may lead to deterioration in the exchange rate export relation at macro-level. In this study, at the first stage using micro data existence of sunk-cost investigated by studying the exportation decision of the Turkish manufacturing firms. Estimation results show that exporting firms are exposed to high sunk costs. In order to examine the possible impacts of the hysteresis caused by sunk costs on the real exchange rate-export relationship at the sector level the Preisach approach is employed. The results indicate that the hysteresis behavior of the firms caused by sunk costs limits the sensitivity of exports to real exchange rate changes in Turkish manufacturing sectors excluding textile, wearing, tobacco, machinery-equipment and communication tools sub-sectors.

Özet

İhracata girmeyi planlayan firmaların karşılaşacağı maliyetlerin birçoğu ihracattan vazgeçildiği zaman geri dönüşü olmayan harcamalardan yani batık maliyetlerden oluşmaktadır. Batık maliyetlerin varlığı, firmaların ihracat pazarına girme veya ihracat pazarından çıkma kararlarını gecikmeli olarak almalarına yol açabilmektedir. Firma düzeyinde gözlenen bu atalet aynı zamanda makro düzeyde reel kur-ihracat ilişkisinde bozulmalara da neden olabilmektedir. Bu çalışmada öncelikle firma düzeyinde veriler çerçevesinde imalat sanayi firmalarının ihracat kararlarında atalet etkisi incelenmiştir. Tahmin sonuçları firmaların batık maliyetlere maruz kaldıklarını göstermiştir. Batık maliyetlerin neden olduğu ataletin sektör düzeyinde reel kur-ihracat ilişkisine olası etkilerini incelemek amacıyla Preisach yaklaşımı kullanılarak ihracattaki kalıcılık analizinde kur seviyesinin etkisi incelenmiştir. Sonuçlar, ihracata girişte batık maliyetlerin neden olduğu gecikmenin, tekstil, hazır giyim, tütün, makine-teçhizat ve iletişim araçları alt sektörleri haricinde kalan sektörlerde ihracatın reel kur değişimlerine duyarlılığını sınırladığına işaret etmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Demirhan, A. A., Akdoğan, K. (2023). Sunk-Costs, Exports and Real Exchange Rate Relation. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 1, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.31671/doujournal.1037825

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. Akdoğan, K. & Werner, L. (2021), Sunk Cost Hysteresis in Turkish Manufacturing Exports, Metu Studies in Development, December 2021, In Press.
  2. Atabek-Demirhan, A. (2016a). Export Behavior of the Turkish Manufacturing Firms. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 52(11), 2646-2668.
  3. Atabek-Demirhan, A. (2016b). To be exporter or not to be exporter? Entry–exit dynamics of Turkish manufacturing firms. Empirical Economics, 51(1), 181-200.
  4. Atabek-Demirhan, A. & Ercan, H. (2018). Export Behavior of Turkish Manufacturing Firms Under Crises. CBRT Working Papers 18(02).
  5. Baldwin, R. (1990). Hysteresis in trade. In Hysteresis Effects in Economic Models (pp. 19-34). Physica-Verlag HD.
  6. Baldwin, R., & Krugman, P. (1989). Persistent trade effects of large exchange rate shocks. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(4), 635-654.
  7. Belke, A., & Göcke, M. (2001). Exchange rate uncertainty and employment: an algorithm describing ‘play’. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 17(2), 181-204.
  8. Belke, A., Göcke, M., & Günther, M. (2013). Exchange rate bands of inaction and play‐hysteresis in German exports—Sectoral evidence for some OECD destinations. Metroeconomica, 64(1), 152-179.
  9. Belke, A. H., Göcke, M., & Werner, L. (2014). Hysteresis Effects in Economics–Different Methods for Describing Economic Path-dependence.
  10. Belke, A., Göcke, M., & Werner, L. (2015). Exchange Rate Volatility and other Determinants of Hysteresis in Exports-Empirical Evidence for the Euro Area. Review of Economic Analysis, 7(1), 24-53.
  11. Bernard, A. B., & Wagner, J. (2001). Export entry and exit by German firms. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 137(1), 105-123.
  12. Campa, J. M. (2004). Exchange rates and trade: How important is hysteresis in trade?. European Economic Review, 48(3), 527-548.
  13. Dixit, A. (1989a). Hysteresis, import penetration, and exchange rate pass-through. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(2), 205-228.
  14. Dixit, A. (1989b). Entry and exit decisions under uncertainty. Journal of Political Economy, 97(3), 620-638.
  15. Krugman, P. R. (1989). Industrial organization and international trade. Handbook of industrial organization, 2, 1179-1223.
  16. Özler, Ş., Taymaz, E., & Yilmaz, K. (2009). History matters for the export decision: Plant-level evidence from Turkish manufacturing industry. World Development, 37(2), 479-488.
  17. Piscitelli, L., Cross, R., Grinfeld, M., & Lamba, H. (2000). A test for strong hysteresis. Computational Economics, 15(1-2), 59-78.
  18. Roberts, M. J., & Tybout, J. R. (1997). The decision to export in Colombia: an empirical model of entry with sunk costs. American Economic Review, 545-564.
  19. Timoshenko, O. A. (2015). Learning versus sunk costs explanations of export persistence. European Economic Review, 79, 113-128.
  20. Werner, L. M. (2017). Identifying hysteresis non-linearities in trade: Evidence from European wine exports to the U.S. American Association of Wine Economists Working paper No. 215, 1-37.
  21. Werner, L.M. Hysteresis losses in the Preisach framework. Empir Econ 58, 1249–1278 (2020).
  22. Wooldridge, J. M. (2005). Simple solutions to the initial conditions problem in dynamic, nonlinear panel data models with unobserved heterogeneity. Journal of applied econometrics, 20(1), 39-54.
  23. Werner, L. M. (2017). Identifying hysteresis non-linearities in trade: Evidence from European wine exports to the U.S. American Association of Wine Economists Working paper No. 215, 1-37.