SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1

COMPARATIVE BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPT OF MOBBING IN GLOBAL AND NATIONAL STUDIES

KÜRESEL VE ULUSAL ÇALIŞMALARDA MOBBİNG KAVRAMININ BİBLİYOMETRİK ANALİZLE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Önder Gürsel(BİLECİK ŞEYH EDEBALİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-1180-8094
Pages
203–224
Publication Date
2026-02-02
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results of this study provide a road map for future research on mobbing and reveal which aspects of the literature in this field are concentrated and which gaps exist.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study is a qualified literature review focusing on the bibliometric analysis of academic publications on mobbing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Publications from 2014 to 2024 were evaluated using bibliometrics methods, including descriptive statistics, citation analysis, keyword co-occurrence analysis, and geographical distribution.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results of this study provide a road map for future research on mobbing and reveal which aspects of the literature in this field are concentrated and which gaps exist.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Mobbing · İşyeri Zorbalığı · Bibliyometrik Analiz

Abstract

This study is a qualified literature review focusing on the bibliometric analysis of academic publications on mobbing. The aim of the study is to reveal the general trends, prominent actors and thematic densities in the literature by comparatively analysing mobbing-focused scientific publications in national (DergiPark) and International (Scopus, Web of Science) databases. Publications from 2014 to 2024 were evaluated using bibliometrics methods, including descriptive statistics, citation analysis, keyword co-occurrence analysis, and geographical distribution. Author collaboration networks, keyword clusters, and country-level productivity were analyzed using VOSviewer software. The study highlights the most citied articles, leading countries and institutions, and the distribution of keywords within the mobbing literature. In addition, the bibliometric network map of the publications on mobbing in the WOS database was analysed in detail. The findings show which topics and approaches are prominent in the mobbing literature and provide a comprehensive perspective on research trends in the field. The results of this study provide a road map for future research on mobbing and reveal which aspects of the literature in this field are concentrated and which gaps exist.

Özet

Bu çalışma, mobbing konusundaki akademik yayınların bibliyometrik analizine odaklanan nitelikli bir literatür taramasıdır. Araştırmanın amacı, ulusal (DergiPark) ve küresel (Scopus, Web of Science) veri tabanlarında yer alan mobbing odaklı bilimsel yayınları karşılaştırmalı olarak inceleyerek literatürdeki genel eğilimleri, öne çıkan aktörleri ve tematik yoğunlukları ortaya koymaktır. Bu kapsamda 2014-2024 yılları arasında yayımlanan yayınlar betimsel istatistik, atıf analizi, anahtar kelime eş frekans analizi ve coğrafi dağılım gibi bibliyometrik yöntemlerle değerlendirilmiştir. Yazarlar arası iş birliği ağları, anahtar kelime kümelenmeleri ve ülke bazlı üretkenlik analizleri VOSviewer yazılımı ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışmada, mobbing literatüründe en fazla atıf alan yayınlar, öne çıkan ülkeler ve araştırmacılar ile anahtar kelimelere dayalı tematik dağılımlar birlikte analiz edilmiştir. Ayrıca, WOS veri tabanında mobbing konusundaki yayınların yazarlar arası bibliyometrik ağ haritası da detaylı bir şekilde incelenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, mobbing literatüründe hangi konuların ve yaklaşımların öne çıktığını gösterirken, alandaki araştırma eğilimlerine dair kapsamlı bir perspektif sunmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın sonuçları, mobbing üzerine yapılacak gelecekteki araştırmalar için bir yol haritası oluşturmakta ve bu alanda literatürün hangi yönlere yoğunlaştığını ve hangi boşlukların mevcut olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gürsel, Ö. (2026). COMPARATIVE BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE CONCEPT OF MOBBING IN GLOBAL AND NATIONAL STUDIES. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1, 203–224. https://doi.org/10.31671/doujournal.1585416

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (46)

  1. Alkorashy, H. A. E. ve Al Moalad, F. B. (2016). Workplace violence against nursing staff in a Saudi university hospital. International nursing review, 63(2), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/INR.12242
  2. Altunay, E., Oral, G. ve Yalçinkaya, M. (2014). Eğitim kurumlarında mobbing uygulamalarına ilişkin nitel bir araştırma. Sakarya university journal of education, 4(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.19126/SUJE.37750
  3. Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
  4. Atta, M. H. R., Waheed Elzohairy, N., Abd Elaleem, A. E. D. M. H., Othman, A. A., Hamzaa, H. G., El-Sayed, A. A. I. ve Zoromba, M. A. (2024). Comprehending the disruptive influence of workplace gaslighting behaviours and mobbing on nurses’ career entrenchment: A multi-centre inquiry. Journal of advanced nursing, 00, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/JAN.16368
  5. Aydin, E. ve Özeren, E. (2019). Akademide işe yabancılaşma olgusu: Araştırma görevlileri üzerine nitel bir alan çalışması. International journal of economics and administrative studies, 159–178. https://doi.org/10.18092/ULIKIDINCE.518296
  6. Baillien, E., Escartín, J., Gross, C. ve Zapf, D. (2017). Towards a conceptual and empirical differentiation between workplace bullying and interpersonal conflict. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 26(6), 870–881. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2017.1385601
  7. Baş, Y. ve Baş, E. D. (2023). Çalışanların mobbing sorununun incelenmesi. The journal of turk-ıslam world social studies, 10(38), 424–448. https://doi.org/10.29228/TIDSAD.71775
  8. Bershadskyy, D. ve Seidel, A. (2024). Choosing a victim you know: Introducing communication to the mobbing game. Journal of behavioral and experimental economics, 112, 102265. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOCEC.2024.102265
  9. Budnik, M. (2020). Mobbing and harcèlement moral in comparative perspective: Study of the phenomenon in Poland and France. Aggression and violent behavior, 52, 101345. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AVB.2019.101345
  10. Castronovo, M. A., Pullizzi, A. ve Evans, S. K. (2016). Nurse bullying: A review and a proposed solution. Nursing outlook, 64(3), 208–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.OUTLOOK.2015.11.008
  11. Çelebi, N. ve Taşçı, G. (2014). Öğretmenlerin maruz kaldığı mobbing (Yıldırma). Journal of education and humanities: theory and practice, 5(9), 43–65. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/eibd/issue/22668/242065
  12. Çelik Maşalaci, B. (2024). Mobbing exposed by deck cadets at onboard training during the ınternship period. Journal of the transportation research board. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981241275540
  13. Çini, M. A., Erdirençelebi, M. ve Ertürk, E. (2021). COVID-19 pandemi döneminde iş stresinin işte kalma niyetine etkisinde iş tatmininin aracılık etkisi. İşletme araştırmaları dergisi, 13(3), 2356–2375. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2021.1266
  14. Cowan, R. L., Clayton, E. ve Bochantin, J. (2021). Human resources as an ımportant actor in workplace bullying situations: Where we have been and where we should go. Handbooks of workplace bullying, emotional abuse and harassment 477–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0935-9_18
  15. Demirtaş, Ö. (2014). İşyerlerinde olumsuz durumları ifşa etmenin etik iklim üzerindeki etkisi: Yıldırma algısının moderatör rolü. İstanbul üniversitesi işletme fakültesi dergisi, 43(1), 136-156.
  16. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, 133, 285-296.
  17. Ebadi Bashir, M. (2022). The legal approach to the prevention and combat of mobbing in labor relations. Public law studies quarterly, 52(2), 1007–1025. https://doi.org/10.22059/JPLSQ.2020.288760.2162
  18. Erdirençelebi, M. ve Filizöz, B. (2016). Mobbingin etik iklim ve çalışanların işten ayrılma niyeti üzerine etkileri. The journal of selcuk university social sciences institute,35,127–139. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/susbed/issue/61815/924853
  19. Garza-Herrera, R., Arriaga-Caballero, J. E., Hinojosa, C. A., Bobadilla-Rosado, L. O., Tabárez-Arriaga, V., Peñuelas-González, E. A., Torres-Machorro, A. ve Delgado-Aguilar, S. T. (2024). Relationship of work bullying and burnout among vascular surgeons. JVS-Vascular insights, 2, 100106. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVSVI.2024.100106
  20. Güngör, S. ve Potuk, A. (2018). Öğretmenlerin mobbing, örgütsel adalet ve örgütsel sessizlik algıları ve aralarındaki ilişki. Hacettepe üniversitesi eğitim fakültesi, 33(3), 723–742. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2018036553
  21. Hamzaoglu, N., Yayak, A. ve Turk, B. (2021). Evaluation of mobbing perception levels of health employees, Health Services Management Research, 35(2), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/09514848211001689
  22. Karahan, A. ve Yılmaz, H. (2014). Mobbing ve Örgütsel Bağlılık İlişkisine Yönelik Bir Çalişma. Journal of yasar university, 9(33), 5692–5715. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jyasar/article/203250
  23. Koç, A., Şimşir, İ., Bağış, M., Orhan, U., & Çevik, Z. (2022). Bir literatür incelemesi aracı olarak bibliyometrik analiz. Kurutkan, M. N. (2024). Bibliyometrik Araştırmalarda Topic Arama Stratejisinin Handikapları ve Potansiyel Tehlikeleri. Uluslararası İşletme Bilimi ve Uygulamaları Dergisi, 4(2), 93-110
  24. Leymann, H. (1990). Mobbing and psychological terror at workplaces. Violence and victims, 5(2), 119-126.
  25. Leymann, H. (1996). The content and development of mobbing at work. European journal of work and organizational psychology, 5(2), 165-184.
  26. Loriol, M., Dassisti, L. ve Grattagliano, I. (2020). Harassment at work in France and Italy first hypothesis for an international comparison. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 53, 101427. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AVB.2020.101427
  27. Marín, C. ve Piñeros, O. (2019). Organizational Management, Human Resources and Mobbing. Findings in Colombia. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 791, 110–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94589-7_11
  28. Meyer, K. (2023). Extreme stress mobbing. Springer berlin heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-67590-8
  29. Mulder, R., Pouwelse, M., Lodewijkx, H. ve Bolman, C. (2014). Workplace mobbing and bystanders’ helping behaviour towards victims: The role of gender, perceived responsibility and anticipated stigma by association. International journal of psychology, 49(4), 304–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/IJOP.12018
  30. Nielsen, M. B. ve Einarsen, S. V. (2018). What we know, what we do not know, and what we should and could have known about workplace bullying: An overview of the literature and agenda for future research. Aggression and violent behavior, 42, 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AVB.2018.06.007
  31. Nielsen, M. B., Tangen, T., Idsoe, T., Matthiesen, S. B. ve Magerøy, N. (2015). Post-traumatic stress disorder as a consequence of bullying at work and at school. A literature review and meta-analysis. Aggression and violent behavior, 21, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AVB.2015.01.001
  32. Nielsen, M., Indregard, A. ve Øverland, S. (2016). Workplace bullying and sickness absence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the research literature. Scandinavian journal of work, environment ve health, 42(5), 359–370. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43999304
  33. Pilch, I. ve Turska, E. (2015). Relationships between machiavellianism, organizational culture, and workplace bullying: Emotional abuse from the Target’s and the Perpetrator’s perspective. Journal of business ethics, 128(1), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-014-2081-3
  34. Ram, Y. (2018). Hostility or hospitality? A review on violence, bullying and sexual harassment in the tourism and hospitality industry. Current issues in tourism, 21(7), 760–774. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2015.1064364
  35. Reddy, T. ve Naidu, S. (2024). The prevalence and impact of workplace bullying among anaesthetists. Southern african journal of anaesthesia and analgesia, 30(3), 79–84. https://doi.org/10.36303/SAJAA.3096
  36. Rüzgâr, N. (2023). Mobbing perceptions of academic Staff. OPUS Journal of society research, 20(51), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.26466/OPUSJSR.1191308
  37. Şenerkal, R. ve Çorbacıoğlu, S. (2015). Akademik personelin algıladığı psikolojik taciz davranışları ile iş performansı, psikolojik ve fizyolojik sağlık ilişkisi üzerine bir araştırma. Gazi university journal of faculty of economics and administrative sciences, 17(1), 107–135. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/gaziuiibfd/issue/28308/300821
  38. Silva, R., Simões, M., Monteiro, A. P. ve Dias, A. (2021). Leymann inventory of psychological terror scale: Development and Validation for Portuguese Accounting Professionals. Economies, 9(3), 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/ECONOMIES9030094
  39. Uğurlu, Ö., Kartal, Ş. E., Gündoğan, O., Aydin, M. ve Wang, J. (2023). A statistical analysis-based Bayesian Network model for assessment of mobbing acts on ships. Maritime policy ve management, 50(6), 750–775. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2022.2029606
  40. Vveinhardt, J. ve Deikus, M. (2023a). Strategies for a nonviolent response to perpetrator actions: what can christianity offer to targets of workplace mobbing? Scientia et fides, 11(2), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.12775/SetF.2023.021
  41. Vveinhardt, J. ve Deikus, M. (2023b). The use of religious resources in helping victims of workplace mobbing. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1288354. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2023.1288354/BIBTEX
  42. Yağmur, A. (2025). Sürdürebilir Turizm Ekonomisi Üzerine Bibliyometrik Analiz İncelemesi. Fiscaoeconomia, 9(1), 538-552.
  43. Yavuzer, Y. ve Civilidag, A. (2014). Sağlık çalışanlarında iş yerinde mobbing ile yaşam doyumu arasındaki ilişkide depresyonun aracı rolü. The journal of psychiatry and neurological sciences, 27(2), 115–125. https://doi.org/10.5350/DAJPN2014270203
  44. Yeşilada, T. (2023). Mobbing. In H. C. Sözen ve H. N. Basım (Eds.), Dark sides of organizational life: Hostility, Rivalry, Gossip, Envy and other Difficult Behaviors, Taylor and francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003376972-2/MOBBING-TAHIR-YE
  45. Zawadzki, M. ve Jensen, T. (2020). Bullying and the neoliberal university: A co- authored autoethnography. Management learning, 51(4), 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507620920532.
  46. Zupic, I., ve Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational research methods, 18(3), 429-472