Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 1

In vivo biocompatibility and fracture healing of hydroxyapatite-hexagonal boron nitridechitosan- collagen biocomposite coating in rats

Pages
76–88
Publication Date
2020-02-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, it has been concluded that it is necessary to increase the physical strength of the coating surface against sterilization and surgical procedures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The biocompatibility of orthopaedic implants and their effects on fracture healing have key roles for success.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, it was aimed to investigate the effects of a novel biocomposite consisting of hydroxyapatite (HA), hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN), chitosan (Cs), and type 1 collagen (Ct1) on biocompatibility and fracture healing in rats.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, it has been concluded that it is necessary to increase the physical strength of the coating surface against sterilization and surgical procedures.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biomaterial · biocomposite · implant coating

Abstract

The biocompatibility of orthopaedic implants and their effects on fracture healing have key roles for success. In this study, it was aimed to investigate the effects of a novel biocomposite consisting of hydroxyapatite (HA), hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN), chitosan (Cs), and type 1 collagen (Ct1) on biocompatibility and fracture healing in rats. A total of 60 adult male Wistar rats weighing 300?500 g were used in the study. The rats were randomly divided into 2 groups named A (uncoated/control) and B (biocomposite coated). Biocomposite (HA/h-BN/Cs/Ct1) coated and uncoated stainless-steel implants were used as intramedullary pins. Groups A and B were divided into subgroups of A1 and B1 (15th day), A2 and B2 (30th day), A3 and B3 (45th day) according to the date of euthanasia. Clinical, radiographic, haematological, biochemical, and histopathological findings were evaluated by pairwise comparisons. The findings were consistent and similar. No statistically significant difference was found for a finding disturbing the biocompatibility. Histopathological examinations showed that coating biomaterials did not resorb over the course of 15, 30, and 45 days. It is thus revealed that the content is biocompatible. However, it has been concluded that it is necessary to increase the physical strength of the coating surface against sterilization and surgical procedures. As a result, based on the interpretations of the clinical, radiographic, haematological, biochemical, and histopathological findings, the biocompatibility of HA/h-BN/Cs/Ct1 biocomposite materials has been revealed.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEVECİ, M. Z. Y., GÖNENCİ, R., CANPOLAT, İ., KANAT, Ö. (2020). In vivo biocompatibility and fracture healing of hydroxyapatite-hexagonal boron nitridechitosan- collagen biocomposite coating in rats. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 1, 76–88. https://ajindex.com/articles/117146

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Lemons JE. Biomaterials, biomechanics, tissue healing, and immediate-function dental implants. Journal of Oral Implantology 2004
  2. 30 (5): 318-324. doi: 10.1563/0712.1 2. Junker R, Dimakis A, Thoneick M, Jansen JA. Effects of implant surface coatings and composition on bone integration: a systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2009
  3. 20 (Suppl. 4): 185-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01777.x 3. Darouiche RO, Green G, Mansouri MD. Antimicrobial activity of antiseptic-coated orthopaedic devices. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 1998
  4. 10 (1): 83-86. doi: 10.1016/ S0924-8579(98)00017-X 4. Rupp F, Scheideler L, Olshanska N, De Wild M, Wieland M et al. Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity through chemical modification of microstructured titanium implant surfaces. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 2006
  5. 76 (2): 323-334. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.30518 5. Le Guehennec L, Goyenvalle E, Lopez-Heredia MA, Weiss P, Amouriq Y et al. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits. Clinical Oral Implants Research. 2008
  6. 19 (11): 1103-1110. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01547.x 6. Tozar A, Karahan İH. A comprehensive study on electrophoretic deposition of a novel type of collagen and hexagonal boron nitride reinforced hydroxyapatite/chitosan biocomposite coating. Applied Surface Science. 2018
  7. doi: j.apsusc.2018.04.241 7. Lee H, Jeong Y, Park S, Jeong S, Kim H et al. Surface properties and cell response of fluoridated hydroxyapatite/TiO 2 coated on Ti substrate. Current Applied Physics 2009
  8. 9 (2): 528-533. doi: 10.1016/j.cap.2008.03.020 8. Raddaha NS, Cordero-Arias L, Cabanas-Polo S, Virtanen S, Roether JA et al. Electrophoretic deposition of chitosan/h-BN and chitosan/h-BN/TiO(2) composite coatings on stainless steel (316L) substrates. Materials (Basel) 2014
  9. 7 (3): 1814- 1829. doi: 10.3390/ma7031814 9. Lahiri D, Singh V, Benaduce AP, Seal S, Kos L et al. Boron nitride nanotube reinforced hydroxyapatite composite: mechanical and tribological performance and in-vitro biocompatibility to osteoblasts. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials 2011
  10. 4 (1): 44-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.09.005 10. Durmuş AS, Çeribaşı AO, Can HN. Evaluation of the accelerator effect of coral and platelet rich fibrin on bone healing. Kafkas University Journal of the Faculty of Veterinary Medicine 2019
  11. 25 (2): 193-199. doi: 10.9775/kvfd.2