Journals / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of gait character of Akbaş and Kangal shepherd dogs by using pressuresensitive walkway

Pages
427–434
Publication Date
2020-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is considered that the studies performed with this system would be a reference in veterinary orthopedic and neurology fields and would contribute to the development of the usage of pressure-sensitive walkway systems for dogs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, it was aimed to evaluate which walking analysis data may be obtained for Kangal and Akbaş shepherd dogs using a pressure-sensitive walkway PSW and which of these data may be used in the fields of veterinary anatomy, orthopedics, and neurology.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Center of pressure COP analysis results of 46 dogs were examined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is considered that the studies performed with this system would be a reference in veterinary orthopedic and neurology fields and would contribute to the development of the usage of pressure-sensitive walkway systems for dogs.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Akbaş shepherd dogs · center of pressure analysis · gait analysis

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to evaluate which walking analysis data may be obtained for Kangal and Akbaş shepherd dogs using a pressure-sensitive walkway PSW and which of these data may be used in the fields of veterinary anatomy, orthopedics, and neurology. Center of pressure COP analysis results of 46 dogs were examined. Distance type gait parameters of dogs were measured and their foot zone analysis values were recorded. It was observed that the pressure values applied by forelimb steps on the ground were higher compared to the pressure applied by hindlimb steps. The highest peak vertical force PVF values were observed in DP3 and DP4 for both forelimbs and hindlimbs. It was determined that the pressure value applied by metapodial pads on the ground were lower compared to digital pads and the PVF values of metapodial pads of the hindlimb were higher than the forelimb metapodial pad values. The correlation between weight and forelimb pressure values was higher than the correlation values between weight and hindlimb pressure values. With the pressure-sensitive walkway system used in the study, COP and foot zone analysis may be performed and distance gait parameters may be measured. It is considered that this system, in which more data may be obtained about the morphometry of walking, is more advantageous with its ease of use compared to other walking analysis systems. It is considered that the studies performed with this system would be a reference in veterinary orthopedic and neurology fields and would contribute to the development of the usage of pressure-sensitive walkway systems for dogs.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNDEMİR, O., ALPAK, H., ERDİKMEN, D. O., KAYA, D. A. (2020). Evaluation of gait character of Akbaş and Kangal shepherd dogs by using pressuresensitive walkway. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2, 427–434. https://ajindex.com/articles/116817

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Yılmaz, O, Ertuğrul M. Türkiye yerli köpek ırk ve tipleri. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 2012; 2 (1): 99- 106
  2. Tepeli C, Çetin O, İnal Ş, Kırıkçı K, Yılmaz A. Growth characteristics of Kangal and Akbaş Turkish shepherd dogs. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences 2003; 27 (4): 1011-1018
  3. Erbahçeci F, Bayramlar K. Yürüyüş. 1st ed. Ankara, Turkey: Hipokrat Kitapevi; 2018
  4. Yavuzer G. Yürüme analizi ve temel kavramlar. Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Birliği Derneği Dergisi 2014; 13: 304-308. doi: 10.14292/totbid.dergisi.2014.33 5. Bosch S, Serra BF, Marin-Perianu M, Marin-Perianu R, van der Zwaag B et al. EquiMoves: a wireless networked inertial measurement system for objective examination of horse gait. Sensors 2018; 18 (3): 850. doi: 10.3390/s18030850 6. Serra Bragança, FM, Rhodin M, Wiestner T, Hernlund E, Pfau T et al. Quantification of the effect of instrumentation error in objective gait assessment in the horse on hindlimb symmetry parameters. Equine Veterinary Journal 2018; 50 (3): 370-376. doi: 10.1111/evj.12766 7. McLaughlin RM. Kinetic and kinematic gait analysis in dogs. Veterinary Clinics: Small Animal Practice 2001; 31 (1): 193-201. doi: 10.1016/S0195-5616(01)50045-5 8. DeCamp CE, Soutas-Little RW, Hauptman J, Olivier B, Braden T et al. Kinematic gait analysis of the trot in healthy greyhounds. American Journal of Veterinary Research 1993; 54 (4): 627-634
  5. Voss K, Wiestner T, Galeandro L, Hässig M, Montavon PM. Effect of dog breed and body conformation on vertical ground reaction forces, impulses, and stance times. Veterinary and Comparative Orthopaedics and Traumatology 2011; 24 (02): 106-112. doi: 10.3415/VCOT-10-06-0098 10. Kim J, Kazmierczak KA, Breur GJ. Comparison of temporospatial and kinetic variables of walking in small and large dogs on a pressure-sensing walkway. American Journal of Veterinary Research 2011; 72 (9): 1171-1177. doi: 10.2460/ ajvr.72.9.1171 11. Adrian CP, Haussler KK, Kawcak CE, Reiser RF, Riegger Krugh C et al. Gait and electromyographic alterations due to early onset of injury and eventual rupture of the cranial cruciate ligament in dogs: A pilot study. Veterinary Surgery 2019; 48 (3): 388-400. doi: 10.1111/vsu.13178 12. Araújo JF, Rodrigues FB, Abadia FG, Gervásio FM, Mendonça GBN et al. Electromyographic analysis of the gait cycle phases of Boxer dogs. Arquivo Brasileiro de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia 2016; 68 (4): 931-937. doi: 10.1590/1678-4162-8770 13. Fahie M, Corte