SavedAdd your journal

Journals / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2026 / Volume: 7 Issue: 1

Turkish Terrorism Studies: A Preliminary Assessment

Cenker Korhan Demir
Engin Avcı
Pages
—
Publication Date
2017-06-13
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article aims to determine the academic disciplinary condition of Turkish

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article aims to determine the academic disciplinary condition of Turkish
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article aims to determine the academic disciplinary condition of Turkish
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article aims to determine the academic disciplinary condition of Turkish
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Turkish terrorism studies · academic discipline · methodology

Abstract

This article aims to determine the academic disciplinary condition of Turkish

🔖

Cite This Article

Demir, C. K., Avcı, E. (2017). Turkish Terrorism Studies: A Preliminary Assessment. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Volume: 7 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.321155

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (50)

  1. Ackerman, Gary A., and Lauren E. Pinson. “Speaking Truth to Sources: Introducing a Method for the Quantitative Evaluation of Open Sources in Event Data.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 39, nos. 7-8 (2016): 617-40.
  2. Aydınlı, Ersel, Erol Kurubaş, and Haluk Özdemir. Yöntem, Kuram, Komplo: Türk Uluslararası İlişkiler Disiplininde Vizyon Arayışları. Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım, 2009.
  3. Crenshaw, Martha. “Current Research on Terrorism: The Academic Perspective.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 15, no. 1 (1992): 1-11.
  4. . “The Psychology of Terrorism: An Agenda for the 21st Century.” Political Psychology 21, no. 2 (2000): 405-20.
  5. Creswell, John W., and Dana L. Miller. “Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry.” Theory into Practice 39, no. 3 (2000): 124-30.
  6. Crozier, Brian. The Rebels. London: Chatto and Windus, 1960.
  7. Demir, Cenker Korhan. Sebeplerinden Mücadele Yöntemlerine Etnik Ayrılıkçı Terörizmin Analizi: PIRA, ETA, PKK. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, 2017.
  8. Freedman, Benjamin. “Terrorism Research Centres: 100 Institutes, Programs and Organisations in the Field of Terrorism, Counter-Terrorism, Radicalisation and Asymmetric Warfare Studies.” Perspectives on Terrorism 4, no. 5 (2010). Accessed May 13, 2016. http://www.terrorismanalysts.com/pt/index.php/pot/article/view/123/html.
  9. Gordon, Avishag. “Can Terrorism Become a Scientific Discipline? A Diagnostic Study.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 3, no. 3 (2010): 437-58.
  10. . “Terrorism as an Academic Subject after 9/11: Searching the Internet Reveals a Stockholm Syndrome Trend.” Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 28, no. 1 (2005): 45-59.
  11. . “Terrorism and Knowledge Growth: A Databases and Internet Analysis.” In Research on Terrorism: Trends, Achievements and Failures, edited by Andrew Silke, 104-18. London: Frank Cass, 2004.
  12. . “Terrorism and the Scholarly Communication System.” Terrorism and Political Violence 13, no. 4 (2001): 116-24.
  13. . “Transient and Continuant Authors in a Research Field: The Case of Terrorism.” Scientometrics 72, no. 2 (2007): 213-24.
  14. Guest, Greg, Arwen Bunce, and Laura Johnson. “How May Interviews Are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability.” Field Methods 18, no. 1 (2006): 59-82.
  15. Gurr, Ted Robert. “Empirical Research on Political Terrorism: The State of the Art and How It Might Be Improved.” In Current Perspectives on International Terrorism, edited by R.O. Slater and Michael Stohl, 115-54. London: Macmillan, 1988.
  16. Gürbüz, Sait, and Faruk Şahin. Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2016. Hülsse, Rainer, and Alexander Spencer. “The Metaphor of Terror: Terrorism Studies in Constructivist Turn.” Security Dialogue 39, no. 6 (2008): 571-92.
  17. Jackson, Richard. “The Epistemological Crisis of Counterterrorism.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 8, no. 1 (2015): 33-54.
  18. . “The Study of Terrorism 10 Years after 9/11: Successes, Issues, Challenges.” Uluslararası İlişkiler 8, no. 32 (2012): 1-16.
  19. Jackson, Richard, Marie Breen Smyth, and Jeroen Gunning, ed. Critical Terrorism Studies: A New Research Agenda. London: Routledge, 2009.
  20. Jackson, Robert. “Constructing Enemies: ‘Islamic Terrorism’ in Political and Academic Discourse.” Government and Opposition 42, no. 3 (2007): 394-426.
  21. Kumar, Ranjit. Research Methodology. London: Sage Publications, 1999.
  22. Lentini, Pete. “Review Essay-Understanding and Combatting Terrorism: Definitions, Origins and Strategies.” Australian Journal of Political Science 43, no. 1 (2008): 133-40.
  23. Lum, Cynthia, Leslie W. Kennedy, and Alison Sherley. “Are Counter-Terrorism Strategies Effective? The results of the Campbell systematic review on counter-terrorism evaluation research.” Journal of Experimental Criminology 2, no. 4 (2006): 489-516.
  24. Merari, Ariel. “Academic Research and Government Policy on Terrorism.” Terrorism and Political Violence 3, no. 1 (1991): 193-202.
  25. Ranstorp, Magnus, ed. Mapping Terrorism Research: State of the Art, Gaps and Future Direction. London: Routledge, 2006.
  26. . “Mapping Terrorism Studies after 9/11: An Academic Field of Old Problems and New Prospects.” In Critical Terrorism Studies, edited by Richard Jackson, Marie Breen Smyth, and Jeroen Gunning, 13-33. London: Routledge, 2009.
  27. Rapoport, David C. “The Four Waves of Rebel Terror and September 11.” In The New Global Terrorism, edited by Charles Kegley, 36-52.New Jersey: Pearson, 2008.
  28. Reid, Edna O. F. “Evolution of a Body of Knowledge: An Analysis of Terrorism Research.” Information Processing and Management 33, no. 1 (1997): 91-106.
  29. Reid, Edna, and Hsinchun Chen. “Domain Mapping of Contemporary Terrorism Research.” In Terrorism Informatics: Knowledge Management and Data Mining for Homeland Security, edited by H. Chen, E. Reid, J. Sinai, A. Silke and B. Ganor, 3-26. New York: Springer, 2008.
  30. Richards, Anthony. “Conceptualizing Terrorism.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 37, no. 3 (2014): 213-36. Ross, Jeffrey Ian. “Taking Stock of Research Methods and Analysis on Oppositional Political Terrorism.” The American Sociologist (2004): 26-37.
  31. Sageman, Marc. “The Stagnation in Terrorism Research.” Terrorism and Political Violence 26 (2014): 565-80. Satana, Nil S., Molly Inman, and Johanna Kristin Binnir. “Religion, Government Coalitions, and Terrorism.” Terrorism and Political Violence 25, no. 1 (2013): 29-52.
  32. Schmid, Alex P. “Comments on Marc Sageman’s Polemic “The Stagnation in Terrorism Research.” Terrorism and Political Violence 26, no. 4 (2014): 587-95.
  33. . “Introduction.” In Schmid, The Routledge Handbook, 1-37.
  34. . “The Definition of Terrorism.” In Schmid, The Routledge Handbook, 39-98.
  35. . “The Literature on Terrorism.” In Schmid, The Routledge Handbook, 457-74. ———. Political Terrorism: A Research Guide to Concepts, Theories, Data Bases and Literature. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing, 1984.
  36. , ed. The Routledge Handbook of Terrorism Research. London: Routledge, 2011.
  37. Schmid, Alex P., and Albert J. Jongman. Political Terrorism: A New Guide to Actors, Authors, Concepts, Data Bases, Theories, and Literature. London: Transaction Publishers, 1988.
  38. Shepherd, Jessica. “The Rise and Rise of Terrorism Studies.” The Guardian, July 3, 2007. Accessed March 11, 2016. http://www.theguardian.com/education/2007/jul/03/ highereducation.research.
  39. Sil, Rudra, and Peter Katzenstein. “Analytical Eclecticism in the Study of World Politics: Reconfiguring Problems and Mechanisms across Research Traditions.” Perspectives on Politics 8, no. 2 (June 2010): 411-31.
  40. Silke, Andrew. “The Devil You Know: Continuing Problems with Research on Terrorism.” Terrorism and Political Violence 13, no. 4 (Winter 2001): 1-14.
  41. . “The Impact of 9/11 on Research on Terrorism.” In Mapping Terrorism Research, edited by Magnus Ranstorp, 76-93. London: Routledge, 2006.
  42. , ed. Research on Terrorism: Trends, Achievements and Failures. London: Frank Cass, 2004.
  43. . “The Road Less Travelled: Recent Trends in Terrorism Research.” In Research on Terrorism: Trens Achievements and Failures, edited by Andrew Silke, 186-213. London: Frank Cass, 2004.
  44. Stampnitzky, Lisa. Disciplining Terror. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
  45. . “Disciplining an Unruly Field: Terrorism Experts and Theories of Scientific/Intellectual Production.” Qual Sociol 34, no. 1 (2010): 1-19.
  46. Thorton, Thomas P. “Terror as a Political Agitation.” In Internal War: Problems and Approaches, edited by Harry Eckstein, 71-91. New York, The Free Press of Glencoe, 1964.
  47. Toros, Harmonie, and Jeroen Gunning. “Exploring A Critical Theory Approach to Terrorism Studies.” In Critical Terrorism Studies, edited by Richard Jackson, Marie Breen Smyth, and Jeroen Gunning, 87-108. London: Routledge, 2009.
  48. Walter, Eugene V. “Violence and The Process of Terror.” American Sociological Review 29, no. 2 (Spring 1964): 48-257.
  49. Weinberg, Leonard, Ami Pedahzur, and Sivan Hirsch-Hoefler. “The Challenges of Conceptualizing Terrorism.” Terrorism and Political Violence 16, no. 4 (2004), 777-94.
  50. Zulaika, Joseba. “Drones, Witches and Other Flying Objects: The Force of Fantasy in US Counterterrorism.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 5, no. 1 (2012): 51-68.