SavedAdd your journal

Journals / All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace / 2025 / Volume: 14 Issue: 2

The Functioning of Normative Power in the Logic of the EU and China

Emrah Yıldırımçakar(AVRASYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6501-5471
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-07-02
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, this study aims to explore and compare the normative power dynamics maintained by the EU and China in the international arena, examine the approaches, strategies, and outcomes of both the EU and China by providing a detailed understanding of how each party implements normative power, and explore the inequalities in normative power acquisition strategies between these two actors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Normative power has become a critical topic of discussion in International Relations and Political Science scholarship, particularly in the context of the normative power of the European Union (EU) and China.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Given the EU’s unique status as a supranational and multinational entity consisting of multiple member states, its process of diffusion of normative power differs significantly from that of China.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, this study aims to explore and compare the normative power dynamics maintained by the EU and China in the international arena, examine the approaches, strategies, and outcomes of both the EU and China by providing a detailed understanding of how each party implements normative power, and explore the inequalities in normative power acquisition strategies between these two actors.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Normative Power · The European Union · China.

Abstract

Normative power has become a critical topic of discussion in International Relations and Political Science scholarship, particularly in the context of the normative power of the European Union (EU) and China. However, academic attention has been excessively directed toward investigating the normative power of the European Union rather than that of China. Given the EU’s unique status as a supranational and multinational entity consisting of multiple member states, its process of diffusion of normative power differs significantly from that of China. In this context, this study aims to explore and compare the normative power dynamics maintained by the EU and China in the international arena, examine the approaches, strategies, and outcomes of both the EU and China by providing a detailed understanding of how each party implements normative power, and explore the inequalities in normative power acquisition strategies between these two actors.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yıldırımçakar, E. (2025). The Functioning of Normative Power in the Logic of the EU and China. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace, Volume: 14 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.1596710

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (42)

  1. Acharya, Amitav. “From Heaven to Earth: ‘Cultural Idealism’ and ‘Moral Realism’ as Chinese Contributions to Global International Relations.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 12, no. 4 (2019): 467–494.
  2. Ai, Jiawen. “The Political Use of Tradition in Contemporary China.” PhD. diss., unpublished, the University of Melbourne, 2012.
  3. Alston, Philip, and J.H.H. Weiler. “An ‘Ever Closer Union’ in Need of a Human Rights Policy: The European Union and Human Rights.” In the EU and Human Rights, edited by Philips Alston, Mara Bustelo and James Heenan, 3–66. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. Accessed October 31, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198298069.003.0001.
  4. Arnorsson, Agust, and Gylfi Zoega. “On the Causes of Brexit.” European Journal of Political Economy 55, (2018): 301-303.
  5. Bang, Juin. “Why So Many Layers? China’s “State-Speak” and Its Classification of Partnerships.” Foreign Policy Analysis 13, no. 2 (2017): 380-397. Accessed March 10, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/orw063.
  6. Barroso, Jose Manuel Durao. “Leading by Example: The EU and Global Governance.” Conference on Global Governance, Brussels, May 12, 2009. Accessed May 8, 2024. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-09-239_en.htm.
  7. Carr, Edward Hallett. The Twenty Years’ Crisis 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. 120-130. London: Macmillan, 1962.
  8. Chen, Mathew E. “Chinese National oil Companies and Human Rights.” Orbis 51, no. 1 (2007): 41–54.
  9. Cebeci, Emine M. “İdeal Güç Avrupa: Avrupa Birliği-Türkiye İlişkileri Üzerinden Bir Çözümleme.” Marmara Journal of European Studies 23, no. 2 (2015): 41-57.
  10. Shih, Chih-yu, and Chiung-chiu Huang. “China’s Quest for Grand Strategy: Power, National Interest, or Relational Security?” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 8, no. 1 (2015): 1–26.
  11. Diez, Thomas. “Normative Power as Hegemony.” Cooperation and Conflict 48, no. 2 (2013): 194–210.
  12. Diez, Thomas. “Constructing the Self and Changing Others: Reconsidering ‘Normative Power Europe’ Millennium.” Journal of International Studies 33, no. 3 (2005): 613–636.
  13. Dig, Mandarin. “Confucius Institutes Around the World – 2024.” Accessed March 20, 2024, https://www.digmandarin.com/confucius-institutes-around-the-world.html.
  14. Duchêne, François. “The European Community and the Uncertainties of Interdependence.” In A Nation Writ Large? Foreign Policy Problems Before the European Community, edited by Max K. and Wolfgang H. 1-21, Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1973.
  15. Ferenczy, Zsuzsa A. Europe, China and the limits of Normative Power, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019.
  16. Forsberg, Tuomas. “Normative Power Europe, Once Again: A Conceptual Analysis of an Ideal Type.” Journal of Common Market Studies 49, no. 6 (2011): 1188-1196.
  17. Galtung, J. Johan. The European Community: a Superpower in the Making. Oslo/London: Norwegian University Press/Allen & Unwin, 1973.
  18. Jackson, Jay. “Normative Power and Conflict Potential.” Sociological Methods & Research 4, no. 2 (1975): 237-239.
  19. Janusch, Holger. “Normative Power and the Logic of Arguing: Rationalization of Weakness or Relinquishment of Strength?” Cooperation and Conflict 51, no. 4 (2016): 504-521.
  20. Kaçar, Fatmanur, and Kübra Öztürk. “Avrupa Birliği’nin Normatif Gücü: Kavramsal Bir İnceleme.” Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 3, no. 8 (2017): 359-370.
  21. Kavalski, Emilian. “The Struggle for Recognition of Normative Powers: Normative Power Europe and Normative Power China in Context.” Cooperation and Conflict 48, no. 2 (2013): 247–267.
  22. Kavalski, Emilian. China and the Global Politics of Regionalization. 1-16. London: Routledge, 2010.
  23. Kristensen, Martin Zoega Bang. “Normative Power Europe: A Case Study on Poland.” Master’s thesis, Aalborg University, 2019.
  24. Lanteigne, Marc. China and International Institutions. London: Routledge, 2005.
  25. Li, Xiufang (李秀芳). “EU Intervenes in South China Sea Issue with ‘Normative Force’.” (欧盟以’规范力量’加入南海问题及其影响)，Peace and Prosperity, no. 4 (2020): 76-97. (和平与发展，2020年第四期，第76-96 页).
  26. Manners, Ian. “The Concept of Normative Power in World Politics.” Danish Institute for International Studies, (2009), 2-4. Accessed May 11, 2024. https://www.diis.dk/en/research/diis-brief-aims-to-help-clarify-the-concept-of-normative-power-in-world-politics.
  27. Manners, Ian. “Normative Power Europe: a Contradiction in Terms?” Journal of Common Market Studies 40, no. 2 (2002): 235-258.
  28. Peng, Zhongzhou. “A Comparative Analysis of the Normative Power of the EU and China.” PhD diss., University of Melbourne, 2020.
  29. Pollack, Mark A. “Living in a Material World: A Critique of ‘Normative Power Europe’.” Temple University, 2010, 1-14. Accessed May 20, 2024. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1623002 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1623002.
  30. Siddiqui, Mohammad. “OBOR to Propel China to Global Leadership.” Financial Express 24, no. 192 (2017): 1-3.
  31. Thies, Cameron G. “China’s Rise and the Socialisation of Rising Powers.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 8, no. 3 (2015): 1–20. doi: 10.1093/cjip/pov006.
  32. Wang, Zhengxu (王正绪). “The normative Force of China's Rise” (中国崛起的规范性力量). Guancha, February 7, 2015. Accessed April 8, 2024. https://www.guancha.cn/Wang-Zhengxu/2015_02_07_308843.shtml?web.
  33. Whitman, Richard G. “Norms, Power and Europe: A New Agenda for Study of the EU and International Relations.” In Normative Power Europe: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives, edited by Richard G. Whitman, 1-20. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
  34. Womack, Brantly. “China as a Normative Foreign Policy Actor.” In Who is a Normative Foreign Policy Actor? The European Union and its Global Partners, edited by Nathalie Tocci, 265-300. Brussels: CEPS, 2008.
  35. Yan, Xuetong. “International Leadership and Norm Evolution.” Chinese Journal of International Politics 4, no. 2 (2011): 233-264.
  36. Yagci, Mustafa. “Rethinking Soft Power in Light of China’s Belt and Road Initiative.” Uluslararası İlişkiler 15, no. 57 (2018): 67-83.
  37. Yıldırımçakar, Emrah. “Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi Bağlamında Çin’in Normatif Güç İnşası ve Türkiye-Çin İlişkileri.” Ulisa: Uluslararası Çalışmalar Dergisi 3, no. 2 (2019): 145-169.
  38. Zeng, Xianghong (曾向红). “‘Normative Power’ Encounters ‘New Great Game’ the Triple Dilemma of the EU in Promoting Democracy in Central Asia” (规范性力量” 遭遇“ 新大博弈”: 欧盟在中亚推进民主的三重困境). European Studies 2 (2020): 34-60 (欧洲研究, 2020 年第 2 期 第34-60 页).
  39. Zhao, Kejin. “China’s Rise and Its Discursive Power Strategy.” Chinese Political Science Review 1, no. 3 (2016): 539-564.
  40. Zhao, Minghao. “The belt & Road Initiative and U.S.-China Competition Over the Global South.” China Economic Journal 17, no. 2 (2024): 166-181. Accessed July 24, 2024. DOI: 10.1080/17538963.2024.2344270.
  41. Zhou, Yihuang. China’s Diplomacy. Beijing: China Intercontinental Press, 2004.
  42. Zeng, Xianghong (曾向红). “‘Normative Power’ Encounters ‘New Great Game’ the Triple Dilemma of the EU in Promoting Democracy in Central Asia” (规范性力量” 遭遇“ 新大博弈”: 欧盟在中亚推进民主的三重困境). European Studies 2 (2020): 34-60 (欧洲研究, 2020 年第 2 期 第34-60 页).