✨
AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI Insight⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)
In this study; it is aimed to show the point the Turkish historiography achieved by comparing Edward Hallet Carr?s book ?What is History?? and that of Salih Özbaran?s ?History, Historian and Society?.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Outlining Turkish historiography between 15th and 20th centuries, this reasearch narrates the general facts and the assesments on those general facts concerning Turkish historiography beginning with the foundation of Otoman Empire from early 15th century through 1950's.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Outlining Turkish historiography between 15th and 20th centuries, this reasearch narrates the general facts and the assesments on those general facts concerning Turkish historiography beginning with the foundation of Otoman Empire from early 15th century through 1950's.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study; it is aimed to show the point the Turkish historiography achieved by comparing Edward Hallet Carr?s book ?What is History?? and that of Salih Özbaran?s ?History, Historian and Society?.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Özet
Outlining Turkish historiography between 15th and 20th centuries, this reasearch narrates the general facts and the assesments on those general facts concerning Turkish historiography beginning with the foundation of Otoman Empire from early 15th century through 1950's. In this study; it is aimed to show the point the Turkish historiography achieved by comparing Edward Hallet Carr?s book ?What is History?? and that of Salih Özbaran?s ?History, Historian and Society?.
🔖
Cite This Article
ÜNAL, Y. (2010). Türkiye'de Tarihçilik, Tarihçiliğin Gelişimi (15-20. yy) ve Türk-Batı Tarihçiliğine Örnek İki Kitabın Karşılaştırmalı Analizi. Kader, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 183–206. https://ajindex.com/articles/116601