Journals / Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1

SUSTAINABLE VISITOR MANAGEMENT IN PROTECTED AREAS: STRATEGIES AND TOOLS

KORUNAN ALANLARDA SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR ZİYARETÇİ YÖNETİMİ: STRATEJİLER VE ARAÇLARIN İNCELENMESİ

Pages
118–131
Publication Date
2016-04-22
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

And also the issues were discussed on a national scale and presented proposals

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:National parks and other protected areas which are rich in natural and cultural resources values and offering economic recreational opportunities, more demanding with each passing day.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For the last 30 years in developed countries, visitor management has been discussed within the framework of sustainability.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:And also the issues were discussed on a national scale and presented proposals
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:National parks · Visitor management · Visitor management strategies

Abstract

National parks and other protected areas which are rich in natural and cultural resources values and offering economic recreational opportunities, more demanding with each passing day. More recreational uses negatively affect the resource values and visitor satisfaction. For the last 30 years in developed countries, visitor management has been discussed within the framework of sustainability. Visitor management frameworks based on recreational carrying capacity analyses have been developed and visitor management plans have been established. Visitor management strategies defined in these plans and have been developed the appropriate management tools in accordance with this strategies. In this study; visitor management strategies and management tools were examined and a unique classification system was developed. And also the issues were discussed on a national scale and presented proposals

Özet

Doğal ve kültürel kaynak değerleri bakımından zengin olan ve halka ekonomik rekreasyonel fırsatlar sunan milli parklar ve diğer korunan alanlar her geçen gün daha fazla talep edilmektedir. Yoğun rekreasyonel faaliyetler ise kaynak değerlerini ve ziyaretçi memnuniyetini olumsuz yönde etkilemektedir. Son 30 yıldır, gelişmiş ülkelerde ziyaretçi yönetimi sürdürülebilirlik çerçevesinde ele alınmış, rekreasyonel taşıma kapasitesi tabanlı ziyaretçi yönetim modelleri geliştirilerek pek çok milli parkın ziyaretçi yönetim planları oluşturulmuştur. Hazırlanan bu planlarda ziyaretçi yönetim stratejileri tanımlanmış ve bu stratejiler doğrultusunda uygun yönetim araçları geliştirilmiştir. Bu çalışmada; ziyaretçi yönetim stratejileri ile yönetim araçları incelenerek özgün bir sınıflandırma sistemi geliştirilmiştir. Ayrıca konu ulusal boyutta tartışılarak öneriler sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKTUĞ, T., KURKUT, G. (2016). SUSTAINABLE VISITOR MANAGEMENT IN PROTECTED AREAS: STRATEGIES AND TOOLS. Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 1, 118–131. https://ajindex.com/articles/116461

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. o o Akten, S., Gül, A. and Akten, M. 2009. Korunan Doğal Alanların Katılımcı Yönetim Planında Ziyaretçi Etki Yönetimi Yaklaşımı Modeli, International Davraz Congress on Social and Economic Issues Shaping The World's Future: New Global Isparta. Anderson, D. H., Lime, D. W. and Wang, T. L. 1998. Maintaining the Quality of Park Resources and Visitor Experiences. A Handbook For Managers, University Of Minnesota. Anderson, D. H. and Manfredo, M. J. 1986. Visitor Preferences for Management Actions. General Technical Report, Intermountain Research Station, USDA Forest Service, (INT-212), 314-319. Anonim, 2016a.Reservations. http://www.yosemitepark.com. Anonim, 2016b. Wilderness Reservation System. https://zionpermits.nps.gov Anonim, 2016c. Türkiye demografisi. https://tr.wikipedia.org Anonim, 2016d. 2873 Sayılı Milli Parklar Kanunu. www.milliparklar.gov.tr Anonim, 2016e. Küre Dağları PAN Park oldu. www.wwf.org.tr. Anonymous. 2002. Public Participation in Protected Area Management Best Practice Prepared for: The Committee on National Parks and Protected Area Management, Benchmarking and Best Practices Program, Prepared By; Parks and Wildlife Commission of the Northern Territory, Avustralya ve Yeni Zellanda. Beunen, R., Regnerus, H. D., and Jaarsma, C. F. 2008. Gateways as a Means of Visitor Management in National Parks and Protected Areas. Tourism Management, 29(1), 138-145.
  2. Buckley, R. 2003. Pay To Play İn Parks: an Australian Policy Perspective on Visitor Fees in Public Protected Areas. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 11(1), 56-73.
  3. Cahill, K.L., Marion, J.L. and Lawson, S.R. 2007. Enhancing the Interpretation of Stated Choice Tradeoff Analysis Through the Application of A Verbal Protocol Assessment. Journal of Leisure Research;Second Quarter.39, 2. Chavez, D. 1996. Mountain Biking: Direct, İndirect, and Bridge Building Management Styles. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration. 14: 21-35.
  4. Cırık, U. 2007. Milli Parklar ve Uzun Devreli Gelişme Planları. Planlama 2007(1):45–50. Cifuentes M., 1992. Determinacion de Capacidad de Carga Turistica en Areas Protegidas. Catıe, Turrialba, Costa Rica Clark, R., and Stankey, G. 1979. The Recreation Opportunity Spectrum: A Framework for Planning, Management and Research. US Department of Agriculture and Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report, PNW-98. Washington DC: US Department of Agriculture and Forest Service. Cullinane, S., Cullinane, K. 1999. Attitudes Toward