SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Coğrafya Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 76 Özel Sayı

Is this the end of tourism as we know it? The impact of COVID-19 on tourism mobility in Turkey

Bildiğimiz turizmin sonu mu? COVID-19’un Türkiye’deki turizm hareketliliğine etkisi

İsmail Kervankıran(SULEYMAN DEMIREL UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-9202-7320
Mehmet Fatih Bağmancı(SÜLEYMAN DEMİREL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9467-8899
Pages
19–32
Publication Date
2020-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Tourism mobility before and after covid-19 was compared according to the data, the changed outlook of mutually realized mobility was interpreted and this new form of tourism mobility in Turkey was evaluated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The COVID-19 global epidemic, which emerged in China at the beginning of 2020 and spread throughout the world after a certain period of time, affected many mobilities (people, capital, goods, trade, migration, etc.) on a national, regional and global scale, but among these, tourism mobility has been affected the most.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although a partial increase has incurred in traveling with the transition to the “New Normal Period”, it has been difficult to return to the tourism activity of the former normal period that modern people are used to, it has not been possible to carry out the usual tourism activities of previous years, therefore different tourism activities from the ones we are familiar with will develop in the upcoming period and it is predicted that tourism practices will develop and the dimensions, quality, scope and outlook of tourism mobility will change.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Tourism mobility before and after covid-19 was compared according to the data, the changed outlook of mutually realized mobility was interpreted and this new form of tourism mobility in Turkey was evaluated.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:COVID-19 · Türkiye · Turizm

Abstract

The COVID-19 global epidemic, which emerged in China at the beginning of 2020 and spread throughout the world after a certain period of time, affected many mobilities (people, capital, goods, trade, migration, etc.) on a national, regional and global scale, but among these, tourism mobility has been affected the most. Prohibiting the flow of tourists, closing country borders, cessation of flights and banning the crossing of even national borders for a certain time has brought tourism mobility to a complete halt in many countries of the world. Although a partial increase has incurred in traveling with the transition to the “New Normal Period”, it has been difficult to return to the tourism activity of the former normal period that modern people are used to, it has not been possible to carry out the usual tourism activities of previous years, therefore different tourism activities from the ones we are familiar with will develop in the upcoming period and it is predicted that tourism practices will develop and the dimensions, quality, scope and outlook of tourism mobility will change. Therefore, the way to understand this changing new form of tourism is to reveal the quantitative and qualitative differences between the familiar tourism mobility of the former normal and the relatively controlled tourism mobility of the new normal and look at the general outlook of this change. However, to understand the general picture, it is necessary to examine the cyclical flow of millions of people from their regions of origin to the target regions, not just one direction of the mobility. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of Covid-19 on tourism mobility in Turkey, and try to understand the changing dimensions of tourism mobility. Data from UNWTO, OECD, the World Bank, the Ministry for Culture and Tourism as well as data regarding incoming and outgoing tourists for travel purposes after the Covid-19 process collated by TURKSTAT have been used in this study in line with this aim. Tourism mobility before and after covid-19 was compared according to the data, the changed outlook of mutually realized mobility was interpreted and this new form of tourism mobility in Turkey was evaluated.

Özet

2020 yılının başlarında Çin’de ortaya çıkan ve daha sonra dünyanın geneline yayılan COVID-19 küresel salgını ulusal, bölgesel ve küresel ölçekteki birçok hareketliliği (insan, sermaye, mal, ticaret, göç vs.) etkilemiş, ancak bunlar içerisinde en fazla etkilenen ise turizm hareketliliği olmuştur. Turist akışının yasaklanması, ülke sınırlarının kapatılması, uçak seferlerinin durdurulması ve ulusal sınırlar içerisinde bile geçişlere belli bir süre izin verilmemesi, dünyanın birçok ülkesinde turizm hareketliliğini tamamen durma noktasına getirmiştir. Her ne kadar “Yeni Normal Dönem”e geçişle birlikte seyahatlerde kısmi bir artış görülse de, modern insanın alıştığı eski normal dönemin turizm hareketliliğine geri dönüşün zor olduğu, geçmiş yıllarda alışılmış olan turizm faaliyetlerini gerçekleştirmenin mümkün olmadığı, dolayısıyla önümüzdeki dönemde bildiğimiz turizm faaliyetlerinden daha farklı turizm pratiklerinin gelişeceği ve turizm hareketliliğinin de boyutunun, niteliğinin, kapsamının ve görünümünün değişeceği tahmin edilmektedir. Bundan dolayı turizmin değişen bu yeni formunu anlamanın yolu, eski normalin bilindik turizm hareketliliği ile yeni normalin görece kontrollü turizm hareketliliği arasındaki niceliksel ve niteliksel farkları ortaya koymak ve bu değişimin genel görünümüne bakmaktır. Ancak genel görünümü anlamak için hareketin tek yönüne değil, aynı anda milyonlarca insanın köken bölgelerden hedef bölgelere doğru döngüsel akışını incelemek gerekir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, COVID-19’un Türkiye’deki turizm hareketliliğine etkisini hem Türkiye’ye olan turist akışı hem de Türkiye’den yurtdışına olan seyahatler ile birlikte incelemek ve bu hareketliliği turizmin değişen boyutu içerisinde anlamaya çalışmaktır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda çalışmada Birleşmiş Milletler Dünya Turizm Örgütü (UNWTO), Ekonomik Kalkınma ve İşbirliği Örgütü (OECD) ve Dünya Bankası’ndan alınan veriler ile Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı ve Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (TUİK)’ndan COVID-19 salgın süreci sonrasında seyahat amaçlı Türkiye’ye gelen ve Türkiye’den yurtdışına gidenlerin verileri kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen verilere göre, Türkiye’deki turizm hareketliliğinin COVID-19 öncesi ve sonrasının karşılaştırması yapılmış, karşılıklı gerçekleşen hareketliliğin değişen görünümü yorumlanmış ve Türkiye’deki turizm hareketliliğinin değişen bu yeni formu değerlendirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kervankıran, İ., Bağmancı, M. F. (2020). Is this the end of tourism as we know it? The impact of COVID-19 on tourism mobility in Turkey. Türk Coğrafya Dergisi, Sayı: 76 Özel Sayı, 19–32. https://doi.org/10.17211/tcd.811302

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (89)

  1. Akçiğit, U. & Akgündüz, Y.E. (2020). Türkiye’de covid-19 odaklı talep şoklarının coğrafi ve sektörel yayılımı. Chicago Üniversitesi Çalışma Tebliği, www.artnotlari.com/arastirmalar. Son erişim 15 Eylül 2020.
  2. Ateljevic, I. (2020). Transforming the (tourism) world for good and (re) generating the potential ‘new normal’. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 467-475. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020. 1759134
  3. Balta, E. (2019). Tedirginlik çağı, şiddet, aidiyet ve siyaset üzerine. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
  4. Baum, T. & Hai, N. T. T. (2020). Hospitality, tourism, human rights and the impact of covid-19. International Journal Of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(7), 2397-2407. https://doi. org/10.1108/IJCHM-03-2020-0242
  5. Brouder, P., Teoh,S., Salazar, N. B., Mostafanezhad, M., Mei Pung, J. M., Lapointe, D., Higgins Desbiolles, F., Haywood, M., Hall, C. M. & Balslev Clausen, H. B. (2020). Reflections and discussions: tourism matters ın the new normal post covid-19. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 735-746. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2 020.1770325
  6. Bryson, J. R. & Vanchan, V. (2020). Covid‐19 and alternative conceptualisations of value and risk in gpn research. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 111(3), 530-542. https://doi. org/10.1111/tesg.12425
  7. Buheji, M. (2020). Sharing economy and communities attitudes after covid-19 pandemic-review of possible socio-economic opportunities. American Journal of Economics, 10(6), 395-406. https:// doi:10.5923/j.economics.20201006.09
  8. Carr, A. (2020). Covid-19, indigenous peoples and tourism: a view from new zealand. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 491-502. https:// doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1768433
  9. Cheer, J. M. (2020). Human flourishing, tourism transformation and covid-19: a conceptual touchstone. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 514-524. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1765016
  10. Chhabra, D. (2020). Transformational wellness tourism system model ın the pandemic era. International Journal Of Health Management And Tourism, 5(2), 76-101. https://doi.org/10.31201/ ijhmt.788628
  11. Chen, G., Cheng, M., Edwards, D., & Xu, L. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic exposes the vulnerability of the sharing economy. https:// doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-26460/v1 https://www.researchsquare. com/article/rs-26460/v1 (hakem incelemesi tamamlanmayan makale)
  12. Cetin, C. & Kara, A. (2020). Global surveillance, travel, and trade during a pandemic. Turkish Journal Of Medical Sciences, 50, 527- 533. https://doi:10.3906/sag-2004-175
  13. Cohen M. J. (2020). Does the covid-19 outbreak mark the onset of a sustainable consumption transition?. Sustainability: Science, Practice And Policy, 16(1), 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1080/154877 33.2020.1740472
  14. Cooper, J. A. & Alderman, D. H. (2020). Cancelling march madness exposes opportunities for a more sustainable sports tourism economy. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 525-535. https://doi.or g/10.1080/14616688.2020.1759135
  15. Crossley, E. (2020). Ecological grief generates desire for environmental healing in tourism after covid-19. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 536-546. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1759133
  16. Demir, M., Günaydın, Y. & Demir, Ş.Ş. (2020). Coronavirüs (covid- 19)’ün Türkiye’de turizm üzerindeki öncüllerinin, etkilerinin ve sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 6(1), 80-107. https://doi. org/10.24289/ijsser.734263
  17. Deniz, A. & Kervankıran, İ. (2020). Labour force participation and violence: a research about female tourism workers in Turkey, In P. Vizcaino, H. Jeffrey & C. Eger (Eds.), Tourism and gender-based violence challenging ınequalities (pp. 65-79). UK: CABI.
  18. Everingham, P. & Chassagne, N. (2020). Post covid-19 ecological and social reset: moving away from capitalist growth models towards tourism as buen vivir. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 555-566. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1762119
  19. Frase, P. (2018). Dört gelecek, kapitalizmden sonra hayat. (Çev. Akın Emre Pilgir). İstanbul: Koç Üniversitesi Yayınları. (Kitabın Orijinal Basımı 2016).
  20. Galvani, A., Lew, A. A. & Perez, M. S. (2020). Covid-19 is expanding global consciousness and the sustainability of travel and tourism. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 567-576. https://doi.org/10. 1080/14616688.2020.1760924
  21. Gibson-Graham, J.K. (2010). (Bildiğimiz) Kapitalizmin sonu. (Çev. Zeynep Gambetti). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları. (Kitabın Orijinal Basımı 1996).
  22. Gössling, S., Scott, D. & Hall, C. M. (2020). Pandemics, tourism and global change: a rapid assessment of covid-19. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1758708
  23. Grydehøj, A., Kelman, I. & Su, P. (2020). Island geographies of separation and cohesion: the coronavirus (covid‐19) pandemic and the geopolitics of kalaallit nunaat (Greenland). Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 111(3), 288-301. https://doi. org/10.1111/tesg.12423
  24. Hall, C. M. (2015). On the mobility of tourism mobilities. Current Issues In Tourism, 18(1), 7-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2014.971719
  25. Hall, C. M., Scott, D. & Gössling, S. (2020). Pandemics, transformations and tourism: be careful what you wish for. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 577-598. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1759131
  26. Hall, M. C., Prayag, G., Fieger, P. & Dyason, D. (2020). Beyond panic buying: consumption displacement and covid-19. Journal Of Service Management, 1757-5818. https://doi.org/10.1108/ JOSM-05-2020-0151
  27. Hannam, K., Butler, G. & Paris, C. M. (2014). Developments and key issues in tourism mobilities. Annals Of Tourism Research, 44, 171-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2013.09.010
  28. Harvey, D. (2020). Anti-capitalist politics in the time of covid-19. Jacobin, https://jacobinmag.com/2020/03/david-harvey-coronavirus- political-economy-disruptions. Son erişim 21 Eylül 2020.
  29. Haywood, K. M. (2020). A post-covid future: tourism community re-imagined and enabled. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 599-609. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1762120
  30. Higgins-Desbiolles, F. (2020). Socialising tourism for social and ecological justice after covid-19. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 610- 623. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1757748
  31. Karakaş, M. (2020). Covid-19 salgınının çok boyutlu sosyolojisi ve yeni normal meselesi. İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyoloji Dergisi, 40(1), 541–573. https://doi.org/10.26650/SJ.2020.40.1.0048
  32. Kervankıran, İ., Sert Eteman, F. & Çuhadar, M. (2018). Türkiye’de iç turizm hareketlerinin sosyal ağ analizi ile incelenmesi. Turizm Akademik Dergisi, 5(1), 29-50. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ touraj/issue/37924/397684
  33. Kervankıran, İ., Sert Eteman, F. & Şardağ A. (2019). Türkiye’de turizm coğrafyası araştırmalarında disipliner ilişkinin sosyal ağ analizi ile incelenmesi. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 18(3), 938-965. https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.558270
  34. Kervankıran, İ. & Bağmancı, M. F. (2020). Turizm hareketliliğine karşı istikametten bakmak Türkiye’den yurtdışına olan seyahatlerin görünümü. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(3), 686-712. https://doi.org/10.21547/jss.744618
  35. Kuebart, A. & Stabler, M. (2020). Infectious diseases as socio‐spatial processes: the covid‐19 outbreak in Germany. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 111(3), 482-496. https://doi. org/10.1111/tesg.12429
  36. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı. (2020). Ağustos 2020 sınır bülteni. Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı. https://yigm.ktb.gov.tr/TR-9851/turizm-istatistikleri. html. Son erişim 05 Ekim 2020.
  37. Lapointe, D. (2020). Reconnecting tourism after covid-19: the paradox of alterity in tourism areas. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 633-638. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1762115
  38. Lew, A. A., Cheer, J. M., Haywood, M., Brouder, P. & Salazar, N. B. (2020). Visions of travel and tourism after the global covid-19 transformation of 2020. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 455-466. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1770326
  39. Mostafanezhad, M. (2020). Covid-19 is an unnatural disaster: hope in revelatory moments of crisis. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 639-645. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1763446
  40. Mostafanezhad, M., Cheer, J. M. & Sin, H. L. (2020). Geopolitical anxieties of tourism:(im) mobilities of the covid-19 pandemic. Dialogues İn Human Geography, 10(2), 182-186. https://doi. org/10.1177/2043820620934206
  41. Müftüler-Baç, M. (2020). Küresel salgın tehdidi altında küresel sistem. In U. Ulutaş (Eds.), Covid-19 Sonrası Küresel Sistem: Eski Sorunlar, Yeni Trendler, (pp. 20-23). Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi, Ankara.
  42. Niewiadomski, P. (2020). Covid-19: from temporary de-globalisation to a re-discovery of tourism?. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 651- 656. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1757749
  43. Polanyi, K. (2017). Büyük dönüşüm. (Çev. Ayşe Buğra). (14. Baskı), İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları. (Kitabın Orijinal Basımı 1944).
  44. Prideaux, B., Thompson, M. & Pabel, A. (2020). Lessons from covid-19 can prepare global tourism for the economic transformation needed to combat climate change. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 667-678. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1762117
  45. Rogerson, C. M. & Rogerson, J. M. (2020). Covid-19 and tourism spaces of vulnerability in South Africa. African Journal of Hospitality, Tourism and Leisure, 9(4), 382-401. https://doi.org/10.46222/ ajhtl.19770720-26
  46. Salazar, N. B. (2020). Labour migration and tourism mobilities: time to bring sustainability into the debate. Tourism Geographies, 1(11) https://doi.org/10.1080 / 14616688.2020.1801827.
  47. Sezen Doğancılı, O. (2020). Covid-19 salgını sonrası turizm destekleri. Türk Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(3), 2808-2820. https://doi. org/10.26677/TR1010.2020.510
  48. Seyfi, S., Hall, C. M. & Shabani, B. (2020). Covid-19 and international travel restrictions: the geopolitics of health and tourism. Tourism Geographies, https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.18 33972
  49. Sheller, M. & Urry, J. (2006). The New Mobilities Paradigm. Environment and Planning A: Economy And Space, 38(2), 207-226. https:// doi.org/10.1068/a37268
  50. Sigala, M. (2020). Tourism and covid-19: impacts and implications for advancing and resetting industry and research. Journal Of Business Research, 117, 312-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jbusres.2020.06.015
  51. Sirkeci, I. & Yücesahin, M. M. (2020). Coronavirus and migration: analysis of human mobility and the spread of covid-19. Migration Letters, 17(2), 379-398. https://doi.org/10.33182/ml. v17i2.935
  52. Sirkeci, I., Özerim, M. G. & Bilecen, T. (2020). Editörden: kovid-19’un uluslararası hareketlilik ve göçmenliğe ilişkin etkisi üzerine. Göç Dergisi, 7(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.33182/gd.v7i1.688
  53. Skift. (2018). Transformative travel: shifting toward meaning, purpose and self-fulfilment. http://skiftx.com/wp-content/uploads/ 2018/04/The-Rise-of-Transformative-Travel.pdf. Son erişim 26 Eylül 2020.
  54. Springer, S. (2020). Caring geographies: the covid-19 interregnum and a return to mutual aid. Dialogues in Human Geography, 10(2), 112–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820620931277
  55. Stankov, U., Filimonau, V. & Vujičić, M. D. (2020). A mindful shift: an opportunity for mindfulness-driven tourism in a post-pandemic world. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 703-712. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1768432
  56. Teeri, M.M. (2020). Safe sharing economy after covid-19. https:// www.futuresplatform.com/blog/safe-sharing-economy-after- covid-19. Son Erişim 04 Ekim 2020.
  57. Tekeli, İ. (2020). Salgınlar ve kentler sarmalında dünyanın geleceği: covid-19, In Ö.F. Çolak (Eds.), Salgın Ekonomisi. (pp. 53-85), Ankara: Efil Yayınevi.
  58. Üstün, Ç. & Özçiftçi, S. (2020). Covid-19 pandemisinin sosyal yaşam ve etik düzlem üzerine etkileri: bir değerlendirme çalışması. Anadolu Kliniği Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi, 25, 142-153. https://doi. org/10.21673/anadoluklin.721864
  59. Wallerstein, I. (2019). Bildiğimiz dünyanın sonu, (Çev. Tuncay Birkan). (6. Baskı), İstanbul: Metis Yayınları. (Kitabın Orijinal Basımı 1999).
  60. Zoğal, V. & Emekli, G. (2020). Türkiye’de covid-19 salgını sürecinde ikinci konutların değişen anlamları. International Journal of Geography and Geography Education (IGGE), 42, 168-181. https:// doi.org/10.32003/igge.741471
  61. Zoğal, V., Domenech, A. & Emekli, G. (2020). Stay at (which) home: second homes during and after the covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Tourism Futures, https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-06-2020-0090
  62. İnternet Kaynakları
  63. BBC, (2020). https://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-turkiye-53284234. Son erişim 04 Ekim 2020.
  64. BM (Birleşmiş Milletler). (2020). Policy brief: covid-19 and transforming tourism, august, 2020. https://unsdg.un.org/sites/default/ files/2020-08/sg_policy_brief_covid-19_tourism_august_2020. pdf. Son erişim 28 Ağustos 2020.
  65. Euronews. (2020a). https://tr.euronews.com/2020/09/16/suudi-arabistan- umre-ziyaretlerini-kademeli-olarak-baslatmaya-haz-rlan- yor. Son erişim 23 Eylül 2020.
  66. Euronews. (2020b). https://tr.euronews.com/2020/10/01/ingiltere- turkiye-yi-karantina-uygulanacak-ulkeler-listesine-ald. Son erişim 10 Ekim 2020.
  67. Global Tourism Forum, (2020). Recovery and beyond. https://www. globaltourismforum.org/recovery-and-beyond/ Son erişim 30 Kasım 2020.
  68. Haberturk (2020). https://www.haberturk.com/koronavirus-salgini- sonrasi-avrupa-turizm-sektorunu-nasil-canlandiracagini-tartisiyor- 2664712. Son erişim 21 Eylül 2020.
  69. https://t24.com.tr/haber/koronavirus-salginindan-sonra-karavan-satislari- yuzde-300-artti,876012 Son erişim 22 Ağustos 2020.
  70. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/sirkethaberleri/hizmet/sosyal-mesafe-cadir- ve-bisiklet-satislarini-artirdi/657837 Son erişim 10 Ekim 2020.
  71. https://www.aa.com.tr/tr/dunya/almanya-kovid-19-nedeniyle-turkiyeye- uyguladigi-seyahat-uyarisini-kismen-kaldirdi/1931350. Son erişim 04 Ekim 2020.
  72. Inquirer (2020). https://business.inquirer.net/299439/travel-bubbles- eyed-to-revive-economies/amp Son erişim 15 Ekim 2020.
  73. Morningfuture. (2020). https://www.morningfuture.com/en/article/ 2020/07/17/sharing-economy-crisis-marta-mainieri/968/. Son Erişim 04 Ekim 2020.
  74. OECD (Ekonomik Kalkınma ve İşbirliği Örgütü). (2020). Tourism policy responsesto the coronavirus (covid-19) OECD. https://read. oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref=124_124984-7uf8nm95se&title=Covid- 19_Tourism_Policy_Responses. Son erişim 22 Ağustos 2020.
  75. Sağlık Bakanlığı. (2020a). https://covid19.saglik.gov.tr/TR-66935/genel- koronavirus-tablosu.html. Son erişim 23 Eylül 2020.
  76. Sağlık Bakanlığı. (2020b). https://covid19.saglik.gov.tr/TR-68443/covid- 19-durum-raporu.html. Son erişim 22 Eylül 2020.
  77. SGK (Sosyal Güvenlik Kurumu), (2020). SGK işyeri ve çalışan sayısı verileri. www.sgk.gov.tr/wps/portal/sgk/tr/kurumsal/istatistik/ aylik_istatistik_bilgileri, Son erişim 05 Ekim 2020.
  78. TUİK (Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu). (2020). Hane halkı yurt içi turizm istatistikleri bülteni. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/tr/display-bulletin/? bulletin=hanehalki-yurt-ici-turizm-i-ceyrek-ocak- mart-2020-33665. Son erişim 05 Ekim 2020.
  79. Turizmgunlugu (2020). https://www.turizmgunlugu.com/2020/03/24/ kapanan-oteller-listesi-koronavirus/. Son erişim 07 Ekim 2020.
  80. TÜBA (Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi). (2020). Covid-19 küresel salgın değerlendirme raporu. http://www.tuba.gov.tr/files/images/2020/ kovidraporu/T%C3%9CBA%20Covid-19%20Raporu%206.%20 G%C3%BCncelleme.pdf. Son erişim 28 Temmuz 2020.
  81. UNWTO (Birleşmiş Milletler Dünya Turizm Örgütü). (2020a). 2020 UNWTO reports. https://www.unwto.org/news/internationaltourist- numbers-down-65-in-first-half-of-2020-unwto-reports. Son erişim 16 Eylül 2020.
  82. UNWTO (Birleşmiş Milletler Dünya Turizm Örgütü). (2020b). World tourism barometer, Volume 18, Issue 5, August/September 2020. https://www.e-unwto.org/doi/epdf/10.18111/wtobarometereng. 2020.18.1.5. Son erişim 25 Ağustos 2020.
  83. UNWTO (Birleşmiş Milletler Dünya Turizm Örgütü). (2020c). https:// www.unwto.org/covid-19-inclusive-response-vulnerable- groups. Son erişim 03 Eylül 2020.
  84. Wego, (2020). https://blog.wego.com/whats-a-travel-bubble/. Son erişim 24 Eylül 2020.
  85. WHO (Dünya Sağlık Örgütü). (2020a). Coronavirus disease. https:// www.who.int/publications/m/item/log-of-major-changes-anderrata- in-who-daily-aggregate-case-and-death-count-data. Son erişim 23 Ağustos 2020.
  86. WHO (Dünya Sağlık Örgütü). (2020b). https://www.who.int/emergencies/ diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/interactive-timeline. Son erişim 15 Eylül 2020.
  87. Gössling, S., Scott, D. & Hall, C. M. (2020). Pandemics, tourism and global change: a rapid assessment of covid-19. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1758708
  88. Hall, C. M. (2015). On the mobility of tourism mobilities. Current Issues In Tourism, 18(1), 7-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2014.971719
  89. Stankov, U., Filimonau, V. & Vujičić, M. D. (2020). A mindful shift: an opportunity for mindfulness-driven tourism in a post-pandemic world. Tourism Geographies, 22(3), 703-712. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616688.2020.1768432