SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 30

DETERMINANTS OF WORK-LIFE CONFLICT IN THE REMOTE WORKING PROCESS: A STUDY ON TEACHERS IN THE TRB2 REGION

UZAKTAN ÇALIŞMA SÜRECİNDE İŞ-YAŞAM ÇATIŞMASININ BELİRLEYENLERİ: TRB2 BÖLGESİNDE ÖĞRETMENLER ÜZERİNE BİR İNCELEME

Berivan Özay Acar0000-0002-2644-4211
Selçuk Gemicioğlu(VAN YÜZÜNCÜ YIL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ, İKTİSAT BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0001-7952-5456
Muhammed Şükrü Mollavelioğlu(VAN YÜZÜNCÜ YIL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0633-4525
Pages
774–797
Publication Date
2025-11-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Accordingly, it is concluded that policy recommendations to reduce work-life conflict of teachers in TRB2 region should be formulated within the framework of demographic, occupational and environmental factors.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:For more than two decades, flexible working models have been an important tool to support work-life balance by giving individuals more control over when and where they work.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Remote and flexible working models, which have become permanent in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, have eliminated the spatial boundaries of work, while creating an increased workload and pressure on employees to be constantly online.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Accordingly, it is concluded that policy recommendations to reduce work-life conflict of teachers in TRB2 region should be formulated within the framework of demographic, occupational and environmental factors.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Uzaktan Çalışma · İş- Yaşam Çatışması · COVID-19

Abstract

For more than two decades, flexible working models have been an important tool to support work-life balance by giving individuals more control over when and where they work. However, this balance has become more complex, especially with remote working practices that have gained momentum with digitalization. Remote and flexible working models, which have become permanent in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, have eliminated the spatial boundaries of work, while creating an increased workload and pressure on employees to be constantly online. This so-called flexibility paradox paves the way for blurring work-life boundaries and intensifying work-life conflict. This study examines the effects of demographic, occupational and environmental factors on work-life conflict for teachers in TRB2 region who were directed to remote work during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results of logistic regression analysis showed that age, marital status, work experience, sector, salary, physical working conditions at home, and telecommuting load were effective on work-life conflict. Accordingly, it is concluded that policy recommendations to reduce work-life conflict of teachers in TRB2 region should be formulated within the framework of demographic, occupational and environmental factors.

Özet

Yirmi yılı aşkın süredir esnek çalışma modelleri, bireylere ne zaman ve nerede çalışacakları konusunda daha fazla kontrol tanıyarak iş-yaşam dengesini destekleyen önemli araçlar arasında yer almaktadır. Ancak bu denge, özellikle dijitalleşme ile birlikte hız kazanan uzaktan çalışma uygulamalarıyla daha karmaşık hâle gelmiştir. COVID-19 pandemisi sonrasında kalıcı hale gelen uzaktan ve esnek çalışma modelleri, işin mekânsal sınırlarını ortadan kaldırırken, çalışanlar üzerinde artan bir iş yükü ve sürekli çevrim içi olma baskısı yaratmıştır. Esneklik paradoksu olarak adlandırılan bu durum, iş-yaşam sınırlarının bulanıklaşmasına ve iş-yaşam çatışmasının yoğunlaşmasına zemin hazırlamaktadır. Bu çalışma, COVID-19 pandemisi sürecinde uzaktan çalışmaya yönlendirilen TRB2 bölgesindeki öğretmenler özelinde demografik, mesleki ve çevresel faktörlerin iş-yaşam çatışması üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektedir. Lojistik regresyon analizi sonuçları, yaş, medeni durum, iş tecrübesi, sektör, maaş, evdeki fiziksel çalışma koşulları ve uzaktan çalışma yükünün iş-yaşam çatışması üzerinde etkili olduğunu göstermiştir. Buna göre TRB2 bölgesindeki öğretmenlerin iş-yaşam çatışmasını azaltmaya yönelik politika önerilerinin demografik, mesleki ve çevresel faktörler çerçevesinde oluşturulması gerektiği kanısına ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Acar, B. Ö., Gemicioğlu, S., Mollavelioğlu, M. Ş. (2025). DETERMINANTS OF WORK-LIFE CONFLICT IN THE REMOTE WORKING PROCESS: A STUDY ON TEACHERS IN THE TRB2 REGION. Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 30, 774–797. https://doi.org/10.53092/duiibfd.1714185

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (68)

  1. Ahuja, Manju K.- Mcknight, D. Harrison- Chudoba, Katherine M- George, Joey & Kacmar, Charles. (2007). It road warriors: balancing work-family conflict, job autonomy, and work overload to mitigate turnover ıntentions, MIS Quarterly, Vol.31, No.1, pp.1-17. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148778
  2. Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E., Bruck, C. S., & Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(2), 278–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.5.2.278
  3. Allen, T. D., Golden, T. D., & Shockley, K. M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological science in the public interest, 16(2), 40-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615593273
  4. Allen, T. D., & Martin, A. (2017). Work–family interaction and well-being: A decade in review. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 86-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.04.003
  5. Allen, K. K. (2021). Job satisfaction of remote technology employees seeking work/life balance (Doctoral dissertation).
  6. Atay, M., & Gerçek, Ö. (2021). İş ve yaşam arasındaki sınırlar ve dijital çağda iş-yaşam dengesi. İşletme ve Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(3), 1-12.
  7. Atkinson, C., & Hall, L. (2009). The role of gender in varying forms of flexible working. Gender, Work & Organization, 16(6), 650-666. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2009.00456.x
  8. Baltes, B. B., Zhdanova, L. S., & Clark, M. A. (2011). Examining the relationships between personality, coping strategies, and work–family conflict. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26, 517-530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9207-0
  9. Bowling, N. A., & Kirkendall, C. (2012). Workload: A review of causes, consequences, and potential interventions. Contemporary Occupational Health Psychology: Global Perspectives on Research and Practice, Volume 2, 2, 221-238. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119942849
  10. Bowling, N. A., Alarcon, G. M., Bragg, C. B., & Hartman, M. J. (2015). A meta-analytic examination of the potential correlates and consequences of workload. Work & stress, 29(2), 95-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2015.1033037
  11. Brough, P., Timms, C., O'Driscoll, M. P., Kalliath, T., Siu, O. L., Sit, C., & Lo, D. (2014). Work–life balance: A longitudinal evaluation of a new measure across Australia and New Zealand workers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(19), 2724-2744. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.899262
  12. Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of vocational behavior, 67(2), 169-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2004.08.009
  13. Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700536001
  14. Cinamon, Rachel G.- Rich, Yisrael., & Westman, Mina. (2007). Teachers’occupations-specific work-family conflict, The Career Development Quarterly, Vol.55, No.3, pp.249-261. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-0045.2007.tb00081.x
  15. Countouris, N., & De Stefano, V. (2023). Out of sight, out of mind? Remote work and contractual distancing. In N. Countouris, V. De Stefano, A. Piasna, & S. Rainone (Eds.), The future of remote work ETUI – European Trade Union Institute. https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/scholarly_works3014/
  16. Chung, H.J. and van der Horst, M. (2018). Women’s employment patterns after childbirth and the perceived access to and use of flexitime and teleworking. Human Relations, Vol.71 No.1, pp.47-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717713828
  17. Chung, H. J. (2020). Return of the 1950s housewife? How to stop coronavirus lockdown reinforcing sexist gender roles. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/return-of-the-1950s-housewifehow-to-stop-coronavirus-lockdown-reinforcing-sexist-gender-roles-134851
  18. Chung, H. (2022). The flexibility paradox: Why flexible working leads to (self-)exploitation. Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.51952/9781447354796
  19. Derks, D., & Bakker, A. B. (2014). Smartphone use, work–home interference, and burnout: A diary study on the role of recovery. Applied psychology, 63(3), 411-440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2012.00530.x
  20. Dorenkamp, I., & Süß, S. (2017). Work-life conflict among young academics: Antecedents and gender effects. European Journal of Higher Education, 7(4), 402-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568235.2017.1304824
  21. Emslie, C., & Hunt, K. (2009). ‘Live to work’or ‘work to live’? A qualitative study of gender and work–life balance among men and women in mid‐life. Gender, Work & Organization, 16(1), 151-172. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00434.x
  22. Favero, L. W. & Heath, R. G. (2012). Generational perspectives in the workplace: interpreting the discourses that constitute women’s struggle to balance work and life, Journal of Business Communication, 49(4), 332-356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943612456037
  23. Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: testing a model of the work-family interface. Journal of applied psychology, 77(1), 65.
  24. Gajendran, R. S., & Harrison, D. A. (2007). The good, the bad, and the unknown about telecommuting: Meta-analysis of psychological mediators and individual consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1524–1541. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1524
  25. Galanti, T., Guidetti, G., Mazzei, E., Zappalà, S., & Toscano, F. (2021). Work from home during the COVID-19 outbreak: The impact on employees’ remote work productivity, engagement, and stress. Journal of occupational and environmental medicine, 63(7), e426-e432. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002236
  26. Gartner. (2023). Gartner forecasts 39% of global knowledge workers will work hybrid by the end of 2023. Gartner. https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2023-03-01-gartner-forecasts-39-percent-of-global-knowledge-workers-will-work-hybrid-by-the-end-of-2023
  27. Ghislieri, C., Molino, M., Dolce, V., Sanseverino, D., & Presutti, M. (2021). Work-family conflict during the Covid-19 pandemic: teleworking of administrative and technical staff in healthcare. An Italian study. La Medicina del lavoro, 112(3), 229. https://doi.org/10.23749/mdl.v112i3.11227
  28. Gilbert, W. S. (2002). The Life and Work of Dennis Potter. ABRAMS.
  29. Giménez-Nadal, J. I., Molina, J. A., & Velilla, J. (2018). Telework, the timing of work, and instantaneous well-being: Evidence from time use data (IZA Discussion Paper No. 11271). IZA – Institute of Labor Economics. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/177075
  30. Grant, C. A., Wallace, L. M., Spurgeon, P. C., Tramontano, C., & Charalampous, M. (2019). Construction and initial validation of the E-Work Life Scale to measure remote e-working. Employee Relations, 41(1), 16-33. https://doi.org10.1108/ER-09-2017-0229
  31. Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of management review, 10(1), 76-88. https://doi.org/10.2307/258214
  32. Greenhaus, J. H., & Powell, G. N. (2006). When work and family are allies: A theory of work-family enrichment. Academy of management review, 31(1), 72-92. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.19379625
  33. Greenhaus, J. H., & Allen, T. D. (2011). Work–family balance: A review and extension of the literature. In J. C. Quick & L. E. Tetrick (Eds.), Handbook of occupational health psychology (2nd ed., pp. 165–183). American Psychological Association.
  34. Grzegorczyk, M., Mariniello, M., Nurski, L., & Schraepen, T. (2021). Blending the physical and virtual: a hybrid model for the future of work (No. 14/2021). Bruegel Policy Contribution. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/251067
  35. Gürel, P. A. (2018). İş-yaşam dengesini sağlayan faktörlerin kadın akademisyenler için belirlenmesi: lojistik regresyon analizi. Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, (16), 31-44.
  36. Hammer, L. B., Bauer, T. N., & Grandey, A. A. (2003). Work-family conflict and work-related withdrawal behaviors. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 419-436.
  37. Hall, D. T. & Richter, J. (1988). Balancing work life and home life: what can organizations do to help? The Academy of Management Executive, 2(3), 213223. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1988.4277258
  38. Herman, J. B. & Gyllstrom, K. K. (1977). Working Men And Women: Inter- And Intra-Role Conflict, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 1(1), 319-333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1977.tb00558
  39. Hill, E., Jacob, J. I., Shannon, L. L., Brennan, R. T., Blanchard, V. L., & Martinengo, G. (2008). Exploring the relationship of workplace flexibility, gender, and life stage to family-to-work conflict, and stress and burnout. Community, Work and Family, 11(2), 165-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668800802027564
  40. Hilbrecht, M., Shaw, S.M., Johnson, L.C. and Andrey, J. (2008), “I’m home for the kids’: contradictory implications for work–life balance of teleworking mothers”, Gender, Work and Organization, Vol. 15 No. 5, pp. 454-476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0432.2008.00413.x
  41. Ingusci, E., Signore, F., Giancaspro, M. L., Manuti, A., Molino, M., Russo, V.,. & Cortese, C. G. (2021). Workload, techno overload, and behavioral stress during COVID-19 emergency: The role of job crafting in remote workers. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 655148. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655148
  42. İlkkaracan, İ. (2012). Why so few women in the labor market in Turkey?. Feminist economics, 18(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2011.649358
  43. İzdeş, Ö. (2015). Feminism redefining economics or feminism as a good accompany. Kadın Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12, 215-226.
  44. Kelliher, C., & Anderson, D. (2008). For better or for worse? An analysis of how flexible working practices influence employees' perceptions of job quality. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(3), 419-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190801895502
  45. Kossek, E., & Ozeki, C. (1998). Work–family conflict, policies, and the job–life satisfaction relationship: A review and directions for organizational behavior–human resources research. Journal of applied psychology, 83(2), 139.
  46. Kossek, E. E. (2016). Managing work-life boundaries in the digital age. Organizational dynamics, 45(3), 258-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2016.07.010
  47. López-Igual, P., & Rodríguez-Modroño, P. (2020). Who is teleworking and where from? Exploring the main determinants of telework in Europe. Sustainability, 12(21), 8797. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218797
  48. Madsen, Susan. (2003). The effects of home-based teleworking on work- family conflict, Human Resource Development Quarterly, Vol.14, No.1, pp.35-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.1049
  49. Mentus, V., & Zafirović, J. (2023). Work–life conflict and job satisfaction: The moderating role of gender and household income in Western Europe. Social Sciences, 12(12), 678. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12120678
  50. Netemeyer, R. G., Boles, J. S., & McMurrian, R. (1996). Development and validation of work–family conflict and family–work conflict scales. Journal of applied psychology, 81(4), 400.
  51. Özer, H. (2004). Nitel Değişkenli Ekonometrik Modeller: Teori ve Bir Uygulama. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
  52. Peters, P., Tijdens, K.G. and Wetzels, C. (2004). Employees’ opportunities, preferences, and practices in telecommuting adoption”, Information and Management, Vol. 41 No. 4, pp. 469-482. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(03)00085-5
  53. Roehling, P. V., Roehling, M. V., & Moen, P. (2001). The relationship between work-life policies and practices and employee loyalty: A life course perspective. Journal of family and economic issues, 22, 141-170.
  54. Shockley, K. M., & Allen, T. D. (2013). Episodic work–family conflict, cardiovascular indicators, and social support: An experience sampling approach. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(3), 262. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033137
  55. Seto, M., Morimoto, K., & Maruyama, S. (2004). Effects of work-related factors and work-family conflict on depression among Japanese working women living with young children. Environmental health and preventive medicine, 9, 220-227.
  56. Smith, A., & McBride, J. (2021). ‘Working to live, not living to work’: low-paid multiple employment and work–life articulation. Work, Employment and Society, 35(2), 256-276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017020942645
  57. Sommet, N., & Morselli, D. (2017). Keep calm and learn multilevel logistic modeling: A simplified three-step procedure using Stata, R, Mplus, and SPSS. International Review of Social Psychology, 30, 203-218. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.90
  58. Ten Brummelhuis, L. L., & Bakker, A. B. (2012). A resource perspective on the work–home interface: The work–home resources model. American psychologist, 67(7), 545. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027974
  59. Terkoğlu, Ö. İ., & Memiş, E. (2022). Impact of elderly care on “sandwiched-generation” women in Turkey. New Perspectives on Turkey, 66, 88-121. https://doi.org/10.1017/npt.2022.12
  60. Thomas, LT ve Ganster, DC (1995). Thomas, L. T., & Ganster, D. C. (1995). Impact of family-supportive work variables on work-family conflict and strain: A control perspective. Journal of applied psychology, 80(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.6
  61. Toksöz, G., & Memiş, E. (2018). İstihdamda toplumsal cinsiyet eşitliği. Ankara: Cinsiyet Eşitliği İzleme Derneği (CEİD). Mayıs, 21, 2021.
  62. Voydanoff, Patricia. (2005). Consequences of Boundary-Spanning Demands and Resources for Work-to-Family Conflict and Perceived Stres. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, Vol. 10, No.4, pp.491-503. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.10.4.491
  63. Vyas, A., & Shrivastava, D. (2017). Factors affecting work life balance-a review. Pacific Business Review International, 9(7).
  64. Wang, B., & Parker, S. K. (2023). Embracing the digital workplace: A smart work design approach to supporting virtual work. In L. L. Gilson, T. O’Neill, & M. T. Maynard (Eds.), Handbook of virtual work (pp. 403–424). Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802200508.00032
  65. Wanyama, R. (2024). The Modern Work Dilemma: Balancing Job Satisfaction with Financial Necessity. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(8), 4285-4296.
  66. Wontorczyk, A., & Rożnowski, B. (2022). Remote, hybrid, and on-site work during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and the consequences for stress and work engagement. International journal of environmental research and public health, 19(4), 2400. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042400
  67. Wu, H. ve Chen, Y. (2020). Wu, H., & Chen, Y. (2020). The impact of work from home (wfh) on workload and productivity in terms of different tasks and occupations. In International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 693-706). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60152-2_52
  68. Ingusci, E., Signore, F., Giancaspro, M. L., Manuti, A., Molino, M., Russo, V.,. & Cortese, C. G. (2021). Workload, techno overload, and behavioral stress during COVID-19 emergency: The role of job crafting in remote workers. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 655148. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.655148