SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 16 Sayı: 31

THE ROLE OF SUSTAINABILITY PERCEPTION IN THE FASHION AND APPAREL INDUSTRY: SHAPING PURCHASE INTENTION THROUGH ETHICS, CONSUMER INTEREST AND PARTICIPATION

MODA VE GİYİM SEKTÖRÜNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK ALGISININ ROLÜ: ETİK, TÜKETİCİ İLGİSİ VE KATILIM ARACILIĞIYLA SATIN ALMA NİYETİNİN ŞEKİLLENMESİ

Ali Köroğlu(TOKAT GAZİOSMANPAŞA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TOKAT MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0003-4021-6300
Pages
201–225
Publication Date
2026-05-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These findings highlight the ethical factors that influence the intention to purchase sustainable products, thereby helping practitioners develop strategies to encourage sustainable consumer behavior.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The negative impact of the fashion and apparel industry on water, soil, and atmospheric systems, and the environmental catastrophe that the world is facing due to increasing consumption, especially with fast fashion, has made it imperative to examine consumption behaviors in this sector and seek ways to increase sustainability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, a study was conducted on 404 people over the age of 18 living in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These findings highlight the ethical factors that influence the intention to purchase sustainable products, thereby helping practitioners develop strategies to encourage sustainable consumer behavior.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Algılanan Sürdürülebilirlik · Marka Etiği · Tüketici İlgisi

Abstract

The negative impact of the fashion and apparel industry on water, soil, and atmospheric systems, and the environmental catastrophe that the world is facing due to increasing consumption, especially with fast fashion, has made it imperative to examine consumption behaviors in this sector and seek ways to increase sustainability. This study aims to highlight the importance of environmental sustainability by examining the mediating role of brand ethics, consumer involvement, and consumer participation in the impact of sustainability on purchase intention. For this purpose, a study was conducted on 404 people over the age of 18 living in Turkey. A questionnaire form was used as a data collection tool in the study. As a result of the research, it was determined that perceived sustainability has a positive effect on brand ethics, consumer involvement, consumer participation and purchase intention. In addition, brand ethics has a positive effect on consumer involvement, consumer participation and purchase intention. Consumer involvement and consumer participation also positively effect purchase intention. Perceived sustainability has an indirect effect on purchase intention through brand ethics, consumer interest and consumer involvement. In addition, brand ethics and consumer involvement, and brand ethics and consumer participation together, have a mediating role in the relationship between perceived sustainability and purchase intention. These findings highlight the ethical factors that influence the intention to purchase sustainable products, thereby helping practitioners develop strategies to encourage sustainable consumer behavior.

Özet

Moda ve giyim sektörünün su, toprak ve atmosfer sistemine olumsuz etkisi ve özellikle hızlı moda ile birlikte artan tüketimin dünyayı sürüklediği çevresel felaket, bu sektördeki tüketim davranışlarının incelenerek sürdürülebilirliği artırmanın yollarının aranmasını zorunlu hale getirmiştir. Bu çalışma sürdürülebilirliğin satın alma niyeti üzerindeki etkisinde marka etiği, tüketici ilgisi ve tüketici katılımının aracılık rolünü inceleyerek çevresel sürdürülebilirliğin önemine dikkat çekmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaçla Türkiye’de yaşayan 18 yaş üstü 404 kişi üzerinde bir araştırma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak anket formu kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda algılanan sürdürülebilirliğin marka etiği, tüketici ilgisi, tüketici katılımı ve satın alma niyeti üzerinde pozitif etkisi olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca marka etiğinin de tüketici ilgisi, tüketici katılımı ve satın alma niyeti üzerinde pozitif etkisi bulunmaktadır. Tüketici ilgisi ve tüketici katılımı da satın alma niyetini pozitif etkilemektedir. Algılanan sürdürülebilirliğin satın alma niyeti üzerinde marka etiği, tüketici ilgisi ve tüketici katılımı aracılığıyla dolaylı bir etkisi bulunmaktadır. Ayrıca marka etiği ile tüketici ilgisi ve marka etiği ile tüketici katılımının birlikte algılanan sürdürülebilirlikle satın alma niyeti arasındaki ilişkide aracılık rolü bulunmaktadır. Elde edilen bu bulgular, sürdürülebilir ürünleri satın alma niyeti üzerinde etkili olan etik unsurları ortaya koyarak, uygulayıcıların sürdürülebilir tüketici davranışını teşvik etmeye yönelik stratejiler geliştirmelerine katkı sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Köroğlu, A. (2026). THE ROLE OF SUSTAINABILITY PERCEPTION IN THE FASHION AND APPAREL INDUSTRY: SHAPING PURCHASE INTENTION THROUGH ETHICS, CONSUMER INTEREST AND PARTICIPATION. Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 31, 201–225. https://doi.org/10.53092/duiibfd.1835746

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (98)

  1. Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U. M., & Herrmann, A. (2005). The social influence of brand community: Evidence from European car clubs. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 19-34.
  2. Al-Haddad, S., Sharabati, A. A. A., Al-Khasawneh, M., Maraqa, R., & Hashem, R. (2022). The influence of corporate social responsibility on consumer purchase intention: the mediating role of consumer engagement via social media. Sustainability, 14(11), 6771.
  3. Altay, Ş. (2024). İnsani değerler ve sürdürülebilir tüketim: Tutumlar ve satın alma istekliliği üzerinde insani değerlerin etkileri. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, 14(2), 595-610.
  4. Alwi, S. F. S., Ali, S. M., & Nguyen, B. (2017). The importance of ethics in branding: Mediating effects of ethical branding on company reputation and brand loyalty. Business Ethics Quarterly, 27(3), 393-422.
  5. Apenes Solem, B. A. (2016). Influences of customer participation and customer brand engagement on brand loyalty. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 33(5), 332-342.
  6. Arachchi, M. J. P., & Samarasinghe, G. D. (2023). Influence of corporate social responsibility and brand attitude on purchase intention. Spanish Journal of Marketing - ESIC, 27(3), 389-406.
  7. Arklan, Ü., & Kocaömer, N. (2024). Algılanan marka etiğinin marka imajı, tutumu ve tercihine etkisi: Türkiye’deki GSM operatörleri üzerine bir araştırma. İş Ahlakı Dergisi, 17(1), 1-40.
  8. Arslan, F., & Bakır, N. (2015). Tüketicilerin ilgilenim düzeylerine göre alışveriş merkezlerini tercih etme nedenleri ve sadakate etkisi. Marmara Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 28(1), 227-259.
  9. Atso Vizyon (2021). Sürdürülebilir tekstil sektörü. https://www.atsovizyon.org.tr/surdurulebilir-tekstil-sektoru/ (Erişim Tarihi: 16.11.2025).
  10. Barbosa, B., & Añaña, E. (2023). The influence of Instagrammers’ recommendations on healthy food purchase intention: The role of consumer involvement. Cuadernos de Gestión, 23(1).
  11. Barger, V., Peltier, J. W., & Schultz, D. E. (2016). Social media and consumer engagement: a review and research agenda. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 10(4), 268-287.
  12. Bianchi, C., Hofer, K. M., & Saleh, M. A. (2024). Purchase intention of brands with corporate social responsibility among generations Y and Z consumers in Chile. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(6), 6246-6259.
  13. Bowden, J. L. H. (2009). The process of customer engagement: A conceptual framework. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 17(1), 63-74.
  14. Brodie, R. J., Ilic, A., Juric, B., & Hollebeek, L. (2013). Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Business Research, 66(1), 105-114.
  15. Brunk, K. H. (2010). Reputation building: Beyond our control? Inferences in consumers’ ethical perception formation. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(4) 275-292.
  16. Brunk, K. H. (2012). Un/ethical company and brand perceptions: Conceptualising and operationalising consumer meanings. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(4), 551-565.
  17. Büyük, H. D., Ünal, S., & Erciş, A. (2020). Sürdürülebilir giysi satın almada etik unsurların değerlendirilmesi: sosyal ağ kullanıcıları üzerine bir araştırma. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 15(3), 1159-1184.
  18. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2020). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (27. Baskı). Pegem Akademi.
  19. Chang, A. Y. P. (2017). A study on the effects of sales promotion on consumer involvement and purchase intention in tourism industry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(12), 8323-8330.
  20. Chen, C., Lin, Y., Shih, M., & Yeh, T. (2024). Effect of green value cocreation on consumer behavior: a professional baseball franchise’s “sustainable party” event. Behavioral Sciences, 14(11), 1050.
  21. Chen, M. F., & Huang, C. H. (2013). The impacts of the food traceability system and consumer involvement on consumers' purchase intentions toward fast foods. Food Control, 33(2), 313-319.
  22. Choi, Y., Kroff, M. W., & Kim, J. (2021). Developing brand advocacy through brand activities on Facebook. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 38(3), 328-338.
  23. Creyer, E. H. (1997). The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: do consumers really care about business ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(6), 421-432.
  24. Çetinkaya, N. Ç. (2020). Tüketici ilgilenimi ve satın alma niyeti arasındaki ilişki üzerinde markaya duyulan güvenin düzenleyici etkisi. International Journal of Business and Economic Studies, 2(2), 98-109.
  25. Day, G., S. (1970). Buyer attitudes and brand choice behavior. Free Press
  26. de Matos, M. L. R., Nobre, L. H. N., de Souza Galvão, L. G., & Nobre, F. C. (2023). Relationships between consumer engagement and purchase intention of ecological products. Revista De Gestão Social E Ambiental, 17(1), 1-17.
  27. Delannoy, A., Baudier, P., & de Vassoigne, T. (2023). Perceptions of ethical cosmetics: Health behaviors during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 23(2), 470-490.
  28. Desembrianita, E., Mulyono, S., Putra, W. P., & Tarjono, T. (2024). Influence of digital marketing, consumer trust, and brand loyalty on purchase intention (case study of green product consumers). International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 5(2), 2003-2015.
  29. Dessart, L., Veloutsou, C., & Morgan-Thomas, A. (2015). Consumer engagement in online brand communities: a social media perspective. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 24(1), 28-42.
  30. Eisingerich, A. B., Auh, S., & Merlo, O. (2014). Acta non verba? The role of customer participation and word of mouth in the relationship between service firms’ customer satisfaction and sales performance. Journal of Service Research, 17(1), 40-53.
  31. Erdoğan, Z., & Özoğlu, B. (2024). Sürdürülebilirlik, elektronik ağızdan ağıza iletişim (eWOM) ve ekonomik motivasyonların tüketicilerin ikinci el ürün satın alma niyetleri üzerindeki etkisi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 15(44), 1338-1362.
  32. Geetha, M., Kaushik, A. K., Abithakumari, J., & Gotmare, P. R. (2023). A meta‐analysis exploring the relationship between perceived brand ethicality and consumer response. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 33(4), 763-779.
  33. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 17.0 update (10th ed.). Pearson.
  34. Gitnux (2025). Sustainability in the fashion ındustry statistics. https://gitnux.org/sustainability-in-the-fashion-industry-statistics/ (Erişim Tarihi: 1.12.2025).
  35. Göncü, K. K. (2024). Lojistik öğrencilerinin sürdürülebilir kalkınma farkındalık düzeylerinin yeşil ürün satın alma davranışı üzerine etkisi. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(3), 1552-1569.
  36. Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  37. Hatzithomas, L., Boutsouki, C., Theodorakioglou, F., & Papadopoulou, E. (2021). The link between sustainable destination image, brand globalness and consumers’ purchase intention: A moderated mediation model. Sustainability, 13(17), 9584.
  38. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (Second Edition). The Guilford Press.
  39. Holland, J., & Baker, S. M. (2001). Customer participation in creating site brand loyalty. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 15(4), 34-45.
  40. Hongsuchon, T., & Li, J. (2022). Accessing the influence of consumer participation on purchase intention toward community group buying platform. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 887959.
  41. Hongsuchon, T., Rahardja, U., Khan, A., Wu, T. H., Hung, C. W., Chang, R. H.,. & Chen, S. C. (2023). Brand experience on brand attachment: The role of interpersonal interaction, feedback, and advocacy. Emerging Science Journal, 7(4), 1232-1246.
  42. Huo, C., Hameed, J., Zhang, M., Bin Mohd Ali, A. F., & Nik Hashim, N. A. A. (2022). Modeling the impact of corporate social responsibility on sustainable purchase intentions: insights into brand trust and brand loyalty. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 35(1), 4710-4739.
  43. Kalaycı, Ş. (2018). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik değişkenleri. Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
  44. Karagöz, Y. (2019). SPSS-AMOS-META uygulamalı istatistiksel analizler (2. Baskı). Nobel.
  45. Kerr, J. & Landry, J. (2017). Pulse of the fashion industry. Global Fashion Agenda.
  46. Khan, I., & Fatma, M. (2023). Does perceived sustainability affect the customer responses toward the brands? Role of customer engagement as a mediator. Sustainability, 15(10), 8259.
  47. Kim, I., Jung, H. J., & Lee, Y. (2021). Consumers’ value and risk perceptions of circular fashion: Comparison between secondhand, upcycled, and recycled clothing. Sustainability, 13(3), 1208.
  48. Kim, Y., & Oh, K. W. (2020). Effects of perceived sustainability level of sportswear product on purchase intention: Exploring the roles of perceived skepticism and perceived brand reputation. Sustainability, 12(20), 8650.
  49. Köroğlu, A. (2025). Sürdürülebilir moda markalarına yönelik tüketici algısının satın alma niyeti üzerindeki etkisinde duygusal bağlılık ve ödeme istekliliğinin rolü. 5. Üsküdar Uluslararası Bilimsel Araştırmalar Kongresi (ss. 849-862). 22-23 Kasım 2025, İstanbul.
  50. Kristia, K. (2021). Mediating effect of customer engagement on the relations between eWOM, environmental concern, and intention to purchase second-hand clothing among college students in Yogyakarta. Jurnal Manajemen Bisnis, 12(2), 162-175.
  51. Kumar, V., & Kaushal, V. (2023). Role of customer perceived brand ethicality in inducing engagement in online brand communities. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 71, 103184.
  52. Kuşçu, A., Durmaz, B. V., & Sazkaya, M. K. (2019). Algılanan kurumsal sosyal sorumluluğun satın alma niyeti üzerindeki etkisinde güvenin aracılık rolü. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17(4), 160-172.
  53. Leal Filho, W., Ellams, D., Han, S., Tyler, D., Boiten, V. J., Paço, A.,. & Balogun, A. L. (2019). A review of the socio-economic advantages of textile recycling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218, 10-20.
  54. Linardi, E. K., Lin, H. F., & Yeo, B. (2023). Effective digital advertising: the influence of customised ads, self-esteem and product attributes. Journal of Creative Communications, 19(2), 197-216.
  55. Lu, T., Wei, X., & Li, K. (2015). Consumer responses to corporate social responsibility programs: The influence of company-cause fit and consumer involvement. Nankai Business Review International, 6(4), 364-380.
  56. Majeed, M. U., Aslam, S., Murtaza, S. A., Attila, S., & Molnár, E. (2022). Green marketing approaches and their impact on green purchase intentions: Mediating role of green brand image and consumer beliefs towards the environment. Sustainability, 14(18), 11703.
  57. Malär, L., Krohmer, H., Hoyer, W. D., & Nyffenegger, B. (2011). Emotional brand attachment and brand personality: The relative importance of the actual and the ideal self. Journal of Marketing, 75, 35-52.
  58. Men, L. R., & Tsai, W. H. S. (2013). Toward an integrated model of public engagement on corporate social networking sites: Antecedents, the process, and relational outcomes. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 7(4), 257-273.
  59. Miotto, G., & Youn, S. (2020). The impact of fast fashion retailers' sustainable collections on corporate legitimacy: Examining the mediating role of altruistic attributions. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 19(6), 618-631.
  60. Mombeuil, C., & Diunugala, H. P. (2024). Investigating the sustainability of the tourism industry through consumer intention to purchase electric three-wheelers: the case of Sri Lanka. International Journal of Tourism Cities, 10(4), 1210-1230.
  61. Neequaye, E. K., Amoako, G. K., & Attatsitsey, M. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and purchase intentions: perceptions and expectations of young consumers' in Ghana. International Journal of Sustainable Society, 11(1), 44-64.
  62. Nichols, B. S., Kirchoff, J. F., Confente, I., & Stolze, H. (2023). When brands behave badly: signaling and spillover effects of unethical behavior in the context of triple bottom line sustainability. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 32(6), 908-926.
  63. Niinimäki, K., Peters, G., Dahlbo, H., Perry, P., Rissanen, T., & Gwilt, A. (2020). The environmental price of fast fashion. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1(4), 189-200.
  64. Nousiainen, T. (2015). Engagement of brand advocates in online environment-Generating online brand advocacy in digital content marketing (Master Thesis). University of Vaasa Faculty of Business Studies Department of Marketing, Vaasa, Finland.
  65. Odabaşı, Y., & Barış, G. (2007). Tüketici davranışı (7. Baskı). MediaCat.
  66. Okur, N., Saricam, C., Iri, A. R., & Sari, I. (2023). Analyzing the impact of Covid-19 on sustainable fashion consumption with a model based on consumer value perceptions. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 27(5), 826-850.
  67. Osei-Frimpong, K., McLean, G., & Famiyeh, S. (2020). Social media brand engagement practices: Examining the role of consumer brand knowledge, social pressure, social relatedness, and brand trust. Information Technology & People, 33(4), 1235-1254.
  68. Pandey, M., & Yadav, P. S. (2023). Understanding the role of individual concerns, attitude, and perceived value in green apparel purchase intention; the mediating effect of consumer involvement and moderating role of generation Z&Y. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 9, 100120.
  69. Pang, H., & Wang, J. (2025). Determining multi-dimensional motivations driving e-WOM intention and purchase intention on WeChat: the significant role of active participation. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 77(1), 113-132.
  70. Peña-García, N., & ter Horst, E. (2025). Loyalty beyond transactions: the role of perceived brand ethics in e-commerce. Frontiers in Communication, 10, 1605171.
  71. Phillips, B. J., & McQuarrie, E. F. (2010). Narrative and persuasion in fashion advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(3), 368-392.
  72. Reppmann, M., Harms, S., Edinger-Schons, L. M., & Foege, J. N. (2025). Activating the sustainable consumer: The role of customer involvement in corporate sustainability. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 53(2), 310-340.
  73. Samarah, T., Bayram, P., Aljuhmani, H. Y., & Elrehail, H. (2022). The role of brand interactivity and involvement in driving social media consumer brand engagement and brand loyalty: the mediating effect of brand trust. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 16(4), 648-664.
  74. Sekaran, U. (2003), Research methods for business: A skill building approach, John Wiley.
  75. Shetty, S. J., Chaudhuri, M. S., & Shetty, A. (2021). The influence of cause-related marketing on millennials' purchase intentions: Evidence of CSR from an emerging economy. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 23(2), 137-154.
  76. Singh, J. J., Iglesias, O., & Batista-Foguet, J. M. (2012). Does having an ethical brand matter? The influence of consumer perceived ethicality on trust, affect and loyalty. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(4), 541-549.
  77. Swain, R. B., & Sweet, S. (2021). Introduction to sustainable consumption and production challenges and development. In R. B. Swain and S. Sweet (Eds). Sustainable consumption and production, volume I, (s. 1-19), Palgrave MacMillan.
  78. Tamaki, S. (2024). Impacts of empathy, identity, and ethical branding on sustainable local food consumption. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(6), 6184-6196.
  79. Tanveer, M., Ahmad, A. R., Mahmood, H., & Haq, I. U. (2021). Role of ethical marketing in driving consumer brand relationships and brand loyalty: A sustainable marketing approach. Sustainability, 13(12), 6839.
  80. Tavşancıl, E. (2002). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. Nobel Akademi Yayıncılık.
  81. Tekeli, G. (2001). Sürdürülebilirlik kavramı üzerinde irdelemeler. Mülkiyeliler Birliği Yayınları.
  82. Teng, C. C., & Lu, C. H. (2016). Organic food consumption in Taiwan: Motives, involvement, and purchase intention under the moderating role of uncertainty. Appetite, 105, 95-105.
  83. TRT Haber (2023). Tekstilde su kullanımı hızlı moda akımıyla artıyor. https://www.trthaber.com/haber/cevre/tekstilde-su-kullanimi-hizli-moda-akimiyla-artiyor-794726.html (Erişim Tarihi: 16.11.2025).
  84. Tryphena, R., & Aram, I. A. (2023). Consumer perception on sustainable clothing among urban Indians. Journal of Engineered Fibers and Fabrics, 18, 1-11, 15589250231168964.
  85. TÜİK (2025). Adrese dayalı nüfus kayıt sistemi sonuçları, 2024. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Adrese-Dayal%C4%B1-N%C3%BCfus-Kay%C4%B1t-Sistemi-Sonu%C3%A7lar%C4%B1-2024-53783&dil=1 (Erişim Tarihi 10.11.2025).
  86. UN Environment Programme (2018). Putting the brakes on fast fashion. https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/story/putting-brakes-fast-fashion (Erişim Tarihi: 2.12.2025).
  87. UN Trade & Development (2019). Sustainable African design in focus on Women's Day. https://unctad.org/news/sustainable-african-design-focus-womens-day (Erişim Tarihi: 1.12.2025).
  88. Van Doorn, J., Lemon, K. N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P., & Verhoef, P. C. (2010). Customer engagement behavior: Theoretical foundations and research directions. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 253-266.
  89. Vivek, S. D., Beatty, S. E., & Morgan, R. M. (2012). Customer engagement: Exploring customer relationships beyond purchase. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 20(2), 122-146.
  90. Wahyuni, A., & Zulfikar, R. (2024). The role of perceived authenticity in increasing green purchase intention: systematic literature review. In RSF Conference Series: Business, Management and Social Sciences, 4(2), 8-15.
  91. Wilk, V., Soutar, G. N., & Harrigan, P. (2020). Online brand advocacy (OBA): the development of a multiple item scale. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29(4), 415-429.
  92. Xue, J., Zhou, Z., Zhang, L., & Majeed, S. (2020). Do brand competence and warmth always influence purchase intention? The moderating role of gender. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 248.
  93. Yang, Y. C. (2017). Consumer behavior towards green products. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 5(4), 160-167.
  94. Yavuz, E. (2025). Sosyal medya aktivitelerinin satın alma niyeti üzerindeki etkisinde tüketici-marka etkileşimi ve marka etiğinin aracı rolü. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 17(2), 1258-1272.
  95. Yoo, B., & Donthu, N. (2001). Developing a scale to measure the perceived quality of an Internet shopping site (SITEQUAL). Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce, 2(1), 31-45.
  96. Zahira, A., Ratnawati, A., & Suhendi (2023). The effect of consumer’s perceived ethicality on purchase intention through brand trust (Case study Indofood and Unilever). Business Review and Case Studies, 4(1), 23-23.
  97. Hongsuchon, T., Rahardja, U., Khan, A., Wu, T. H., Hung, C. W., Chang, R. H.,. & Chen, S. C. (2023). Brand experience on brand attachment: The role of interpersonal interaction, feedback, and advocacy. Emerging Science Journal, 7(4), 1232-1246.
  98. Leal Filho, W., Ellams, D., Han, S., Tyler, D., Boiten, V. J., Paço, A.,. & Balogun, A. L. (2019). A review of the socio-economic advantages of textile recycling. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218, 10-20.