Journals / Beykoz Akademi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

TURKEY AND FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN THE LIGHT OF ECHR JUDGMENTS

Pages
180–203
Publication Date
2019-07-02
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The data in question have been collected from HUDOC19 ECHR’s own database), and Ministry of Justice’s20 database.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Human rights, which are related to humans’ being able to realize themselves as honorable beings and to live humanely, reach a mutual agreement on “protecting” and “improving” all humans and states at an ideal level; whereas, they cannot provide stability in practice.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although a number of measures have been taken, both internally and externally, to prevent the violations of human rights, there has been an increase in the number of violations as well as an increase in the variety of those violations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The data in question have been collected from HUDOC19 ECHR’s own database), and Ministry of Justice’s20 database.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:AİHM · AİHS · İfade Ögürlüğü

Özet

Human rights, which are related to humans’ being able to realize themselves as honorable beings and to live humanely, reach a mutual agreement on “protecting” and “improving” all humans and states at an ideal level; whereas, they cannot provide stability in practice. Although a number of measures have been taken, both internally and externally, to prevent the violations of human rights, there has been an increase in the number of violations as well as an increase in the variety of those violations. This increase required the establishment of new control mechanisms by all means. European Court of Human Rights emerges to be the judicial body of these control mechanisms. The sphere of influence of the ECHR, which has recently gained popularity and is seen as the final point to bring justice by many citizens, has considerably expanded as a result of the number of members in European Council hitting 47. ECHR is a control mechanism established by European Convention of Human Rights. This study crystallizes the human rights at a conceptual level and statistically analyses a total of 207 judgments (cases) on freedom of expression, which resulted against Turkey in ECHR between the years 1987 and 2011. The data in question have been collected from HUDOC19 ECHR’s own database), and Ministry of Justice’s20 database.

🔖

Cite This Article

Durul, F. (2019). TURKEY AND FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION IN THE LIGHT OF ECHR JUDGMENTS. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 180–203. https://doi.org/10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2019.7/1.180-203

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (51)

  1. Akyol H. (2010). Kürt Medyasında Yirmi Yıl, Istanbul: Evrensel Basın Yayın
  2. Anar E. (1999). İ nsan Hakları, Ankara: Maki Basın Yayın
  3. Aybay R. (2010). İnsan Hakları Seçilmiş Makaleler, Istanbul: Pencere Yayınları
  4. Çotuksöken B. (2010). İnsan Hakları ve Felsefe, Istanbul: Papatya Yayıncılık
  5. Doğru O. (1998). İnsan Hakları Uluslararası Mevzuatı, Istanbul: Beta Yayınları
  6. Doğru O. Nalbant A. (2000). İnsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesi ve Türkiye Karar Özetleri (1995-2000), Istanbul: İstanbul Barosu Yayınları
  7. Donelly J. (1989). Teoride ve Uygulamada Evrensel İ nsan Hakları, Ankara: Yetkin Yayınları
  8. Durul F. (1998). Küreselleşme ve İ nsan Hakları, Istanbul: Toroslu Yayıncılık
  9. Erdem F.H. (1998). In Ankara Barosu Dergisi, Düş ünce Özgürlüğ ü ve Demokrasi, vol: 55, Ankara, 1998/1, pg.5-36
  10. Erdoğan M. (2007). İnsan Hakları Teorisi ve Hukuku, Ankara: Orion Kitabevi
  11. Ergül E. (2004). Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesi ve Uygulaması, Ankara: Yargı Yayınları Frowein, A.F. (1992). İnsan Haklarının Çağ daş Yorumu. In Anayasa Yargısı Dergisi, Vol No: 9, Ankara: pg.111-115
  12. Gemalmaz S. (2001). Ulusalüstü İnsan Hakları Hukukunun Genel Teorisine Giriş, Istanbul: Beta Yayınları
  13. Gemalmaz S.( 2010). Ulusalüstü İnsan Hakları Hukukunun Genel Teorisine Giriş, Istanbul: Legal Yayınları
  14. Gülmez M. (2001). İnsan Hakları ve Demokrasi Eğ itimi, Ankara: TODAİE
  15. Güneş S. (1998), “İ şkence, Eziyet ve İ nsan Onuruyla Bağ daşmayan Muamele Yasağ ı”, Yeni Türkiye Dergisi, Vol. 22, Ankara: pg.915- 923
  16. Kapani M. (1976). Kamu Hürriyetleri, Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Yayınları
  17. Kuçuradi İ. (2004). Felsefe ve İnsan Hakları, Ankara: Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi
  18. Özbey Ö. (2008). Avrupa İnsan Hakları Mahkemesine Baş vuru Yöntemleri, Ankara: Adalet Yayınları
  19. Özdek Y. (2004), Avrupa İnsan Hakları Hukuku ve Türkiye, TODAİ E, ed.321, Ankara: pg. 265 – 273
  20. Reisoğ lu S. (2001). Uluslararası Boyutlarıyla İnsan Hakları, Istanbul: Beta Yayınları
  21. Tanrıkulu S. (2007). İ nsan Hakları Avrupa Mahkemesi’ne Bireysel Başvuru İçin El Kitabı, Istanbul: Seckin Yayınları
  22. Tezcan D.(2006). İnsan Hakları El Kitabı, Ankara: Seckin Yayınlar
  23. Uygun O. (2000). İnsan Hakları Kuramı, Ankara: Yapı Kredi Yayınları
  24. Ünal Ş. (1997). Temel Hak ve Özgürlükler ve İnsan Hakları Hukuku, Ankara: Yetkin Yayınları
  25. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/Pages/search.aspx
  26. http://www.inhak.adalet.gov.tr/mevzuat/mevzuat.html
  27. http://www.istanbul.edu.tr/idarehukuku/belgeler/fransizyurttashaklaribil- dirisi.pdf
  28. http://www.ihb.gov.tr/Yayinlarimiz/insan_haklari_kitabi_LOW.pdf (Date of Access: 11 November 2008)
  29. http://www.dusuncetarihi.com/makale/dort-ozgurluk-soeylevi (Date of Access: 11 January 2011)
  30. http://www.ikincigrup.com/index.asp?haberID=28462 (Date of Access:24.08.2011)
  31. http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/komisyon/insanhaklari/pdf01/3-30.pdf
  32. http://www.un.org.tr/ (Date of Access: 24 March 2011)
  33. http://www. belgenet.com/arsiv/bm/bmsiyasihak.html (Date of Access: 2 Ağ ustos 2011)
  34. http:// www. belgenet.com/arsiv/bm/bmsiyasihak.html (Accessed on 2 August 2011)
  35. http://www.belgenet.com/arsiv/bm/bmsiyasihak.html (Accessed on 2 August 2011)
  36. http://www.unicef.org/turkey/cedaw/_gi18. html) (Accessed on 2 August 2011)
  37. http://www.un.org/documents/ga/res/39/ a39r046.htm (Accessed on 2 August 2011)
  38. http://www.tbmm.gov.tr/komisyon/insanhaklari/pdf01/137-160.pdf) (Accessed on 2 August 2011)
  39. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/instree/l2ptichr.htm (Accessed on 25 May 2012)
  40. http://www.unhchr.ch/huridocda/huridoca.nsf/(symbol)/a.conf.157.23.en (Accessed on 18 April 2012)
  41. http://www.mfa.gov.tr/avrupa-konseyi_.tr.mfa (Accessed on 10.10.2012)
  42. http://www.anayasa.gov.tr/files/bireysel_basvuru/AIHS_tr.pdf (Accessed on 21 March 2011)
  43. http://www.echr.coe.int/NR/rdonlyres/A6FDF170-5DA0-4F25-8017-8D49A83681F0/0/TUR_50questions_Web.pdf (Date of Access:10.06.2011)
  44. http://www.yargitay.gov.tr/abproje/belge/dagitim/66_Soruda_Bireysel_Bas- vuru.pdf (Date of access: 01.09.2012)
  45. http://www.ihb.gov.tr/dosyagoster.ashx?id=291 (Date of access: 29 Mayıs 2012)
  46. http://www.inhak.adalet.gov.tr/istatistikler/2011_ist/03.pdf (Date of access: 25 March 2012)
  47. http://www.hukukîhaber.net/ekonomi/2011-aihm-faturasi-37-milyon- tl-h23328.html (Date of access: 10 March 2012
  48. http://www.inhak.adalet.gov.tr/istatistikler/2011_ist/04.pdf (Date of access: 19 May 2012)
  49. http://echr.coe.int/Documents/Annual_report_2012_ENG.pdf
  50. http://www.inhak.adalet.gov.tr/istatistikler/2011_ist/01.pdf (Date of access: 10 May 2012)
  51. Gemalmaz S.( 2010). Ulusalüstü İnsan Hakları Hukukunun Genel Teorisine Giriş, Istanbul: Legal Yayınları